使用矩阵铅笔和ESPRIT方法使用单个和多个快照的DOA估计

N. Yilmazer, T. Sarkar, M. Salazar-Palma
{"title":"使用矩阵铅笔和ESPRIT方法使用单个和多个快照的DOA估计","authors":"N. Yilmazer, T. Sarkar, M. Salazar-Palma","doi":"10.1109/URSI-EMTS.2010.5637087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this presentation, we compare the performance of the Matrix Pencil (MP) and ESPRIT (Estimation of Signal Parameters using Rotational In-variance Technique) methods for direction of arrival estimation using single and multiple snapshots. The Matrix Pencil method is a technique that directly deals with the data to estimate the poles corresponding to the directions of arrival, and works well under a correlated signal case. This is in contrast to ESPRIT, a statistical subspace based estimation technique, which will work for the correlated case after applying some additional spatial smoothing techniques to the covariance matrix of the data. Simulation results are provided to compare the performance between these two methods. The results clearly demonstrates that when a small number of snapshots, including a single one, is available to process the data, the MP method always performs better than the ESPRIT method.","PeriodicalId":404116,"journal":{"name":"2010 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DOA Estimation using Matrix Pencil and ESPRIT methods using single and multiple snapshots\",\"authors\":\"N. Yilmazer, T. Sarkar, M. Salazar-Palma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/URSI-EMTS.2010.5637087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this presentation, we compare the performance of the Matrix Pencil (MP) and ESPRIT (Estimation of Signal Parameters using Rotational In-variance Technique) methods for direction of arrival estimation using single and multiple snapshots. The Matrix Pencil method is a technique that directly deals with the data to estimate the poles corresponding to the directions of arrival, and works well under a correlated signal case. This is in contrast to ESPRIT, a statistical subspace based estimation technique, which will work for the correlated case after applying some additional spatial smoothing techniques to the covariance matrix of the data. Simulation results are provided to compare the performance between these two methods. The results clearly demonstrates that when a small number of snapshots, including a single one, is available to process the data, the MP method always performs better than the ESPRIT method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/URSI-EMTS.2010.5637087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/URSI-EMTS.2010.5637087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

在本报告中,我们比较了矩阵铅笔(MP)和ESPRIT(使用旋转方差技术估计信号参数)方法的性能,用于使用单个和多个快照进行到达方向估计。矩阵铅笔法是一种直接处理数据来估计到达方向对应的极点的技术,在相关信号情况下效果良好。这与ESPRIT形成对比,ESPRIT是一种基于统计子空间的估计技术,在对数据的协方差矩阵应用一些额外的空间平滑技术后,它将适用于相关情况。仿真结果比较了两种方法的性能。结果清楚地表明,当有少量快照(包括单个快照)可用于处理数据时,MP方法总是比ESPRIT方法性能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DOA Estimation using Matrix Pencil and ESPRIT methods using single and multiple snapshots
In this presentation, we compare the performance of the Matrix Pencil (MP) and ESPRIT (Estimation of Signal Parameters using Rotational In-variance Technique) methods for direction of arrival estimation using single and multiple snapshots. The Matrix Pencil method is a technique that directly deals with the data to estimate the poles corresponding to the directions of arrival, and works well under a correlated signal case. This is in contrast to ESPRIT, a statistical subspace based estimation technique, which will work for the correlated case after applying some additional spatial smoothing techniques to the covariance matrix of the data. Simulation results are provided to compare the performance between these two methods. The results clearly demonstrates that when a small number of snapshots, including a single one, is available to process the data, the MP method always performs better than the ESPRIT method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信