Beata Lejman
{"title":"O niebezpiecznych związkach sztuki i polityki na przykładzie „żywotów równoległych” Michaela Willmanna i Philipa Bentuma","authors":"Beata Lejman","doi":"10.26881/PORTA.2020.19.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Michael Lucas Leopold Willmann (1630–1706) was born in Königsberg (now Kalinin grad in Russia), where his first teacher was Christian Peter, a well -off guild painter. After years of journeys of apprenticeship and learning in the Netherlands, the young artist returned to his homeland, after Matthias Czwiczek’s death in 1654 probably hoping for the position of the painter at the court of Great Elector Frederick William (1620–1688).What served to draw the ruler’s attention to himself was probably the lost painting, described by Johann Joachim von Sandrart as follows: ‘the Vulcan with his cyclops makes armour for Mars and a shield and a spear for Minerva’. The failure of these efforts led the future ‘Apelles’ to emigrate to Silesia, where he created a family painting workshop in Lubiąż (Leubus), and following the conversion from Calvinism to Catholicism, he became a Cistercian painter, creating famous works of art in religious or secular centres of Crown Bohemia. What connects him to Prussia is another painting of great importance in his career, the little -known ‘Apotheosis of the Great Elector as a Guardian of Arts’ from 1682. \nThe successor to Great Elector Frederick III (1657–1713) was crowned in 1701 as the ‘king of Prussia’. The ceremony required an appropriate artistic setting, which prompted many artists to flock to Königsberg, including a Dutchman from Leiden, the painter Justus Bentum, a pupil of Gottfred Schalken, who reached the capital of the new kingdom together with his son Philip Christian. After studying from his father, Philip Christian Bentum (ok. 1690 – po 1757) followed in the footsteps of the famous Willmann, and went on a journey, from which he never returned to Prussia. He went first to imperial Prague, where he collaborated with Peter Brandl and converted to Catholicism, following which he travelled to Silesia. After 1731, he took part in the artistic projects of Bishop Franz Ludwig von Pfalz–Neuburg of Wrocław (Breslau) and Abbot Constantin Beyer, who completed the project begun by Freiberger and Willmann: the extension and decoration of the Cistercian Abbey in Lubiąż. It was there that he made the largest in Europe canvas -painted oil plafond of the Prince’s Hall and completed his opus magnum: covering all the library walls and vaults with painting. Those pro -Habsburg works were finished two years before the death of Emperor Charles VI (1685–1740) and the military invasion of Silesia by Frederick II Hohenzollern (1712–1786), great - -grandson of the Great Elector. \nThe fate of the artists mentioned in the title was intertwined with Königsberg and Lubiąż. Both converts set off for the professional maturity from the Prussian capital via Prague to Silesia. They can be compared by the Dutch sources of their art and a compilation method of creating images using print ‘prototypes’. Their inner discrepancy can be seen in the choice of these patterns, as they followed both the Catholic Rubens and the Protestant Rembrandt Van Rijn. They were connected with the provinces playing a key role in Central -European politics: here the Hohenzollerns competed for power in Central Europe with the Habsburgs. They were witnessesto the game for winning Silesia, and even took part in it by creating propagandistic art. Both of them worked for Bishop Franz Ludwig von Pfalz–Neuburg (1664–1732), associated with the Emperor, a kind of the capo di tutti capi of the Counter -Reformation in Silesia. Bentum eagerly imitated selected compositions of his predecessor and master from Lubiąż, and I think he even tried to surpass him in scale and precision. The artistic competition with Willman is visible in the paintings of the library in Lubiąż. There, he presented an Allegory of Painting, which shows the image of Willmann carried by an angel, while the inscription praising the qualities of his character calls him ‘Apelles’. \nThe work of both painters, who took their first steps in the profession as Protestants in Königsberg, but became famous through their work for Catholics, provides an interesting material for the analysis of the general topic of artistic careers on the periphery of Europe, the relationship between the centres and the periphery, as well as for two stages of re -Catholisation in Silesia treated as an instrument of power. It was usually pointed out how much separates the two painters, but no one has ever tried to show what unites them. The comparison of the sources, motifs, and outstanding achievements of both of them, especially in Lubiąż, gives a more complete picture of their activity deeply immersed in the politics of their times. This picture is not as unambiguous as it has been so far, highlighting the political and propaganda aspects of their career spreading out between the coastal Protestant north and the Catholic south. The drama of their lives took place in Silesia, where the multiple dividing lines of Europe intersected. \nThe idea of narrating the parallel fates of two artists with great Politics in the background (as in he case of Plutarch’s ‘Parallel Lives’) came to my mind years ago when I curated the Exhibition ‘Willmann – Drawings. A Baroque Artist’s Workshop’ (2001, National Museum in Wrocław, in cooperation with Salzburg and Stuttgart). The present paper was to be included in the volume accompanying that project initiated by Andrzej Kozieł (Willmann and Others. Painting, Drawing and Graphic Arts in Silesia and Neighbouring Countries in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. A. Kozieł, B. Lejman, Wrocław 2002), but I withdrew from its publication. I am hereby publishing it, thanking Małgorzata Omilanowska for her presence at the opening of this first great exhibition of mine in 2001, as well for the excellent cooperation with my Austrian, Czech, German, and Polish colleagues. This text, referring to the topic of our discussions at the time – as on the event of the above -mentioned exhibition I spoke at a press conference in Stuttgart’s Staatsgalerie, where the curator of the German exhibition was Hans Martin Kaulbach, exactly two days after the attack on WTC.","PeriodicalId":408035,"journal":{"name":"Porta Aurea","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porta Aurea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/PORTA.2020.19.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迈克尔·卢卡斯·利奥波德·威尔曼(1630-1706)出生于Königsberg(现在俄罗斯加里宁的毕业生),在那里他的第一位老师是Christian Peter,一个富裕的公会画家。在荷兰做了多年的学徒和学习之后,这位年轻的艺术家在1654年Matthias Czwiczek去世后回到了他的祖国,可能是希望在大选帝侯Frederick William(1620-1688)的宫廷里担任画家。引起这位统治者注意的可能是这幅丢失的画,约翰·约阿希姆·冯·桑德拉特这样描述:“火神和他的独眼巨人为马尔斯制作盔甲,为密涅瓦制作盾牌和长矛。”这些努力的失败导致未来的“阿佩莱斯”移民到西里西亚,在那里他在Lubiąż (Leubus)创建了一个家庭绘画工作室,并从加尔文主义转变为天主教,他成为了一名西多会画家,在宗教或世俗中心创造了著名的艺术作品。将他与普鲁士联系起来的是另一幅在他的职业生涯中非常重要的画,这幅画创作于1682年,鲜为人知的《伟大选帝侯作为艺术守护者的神化》。大选帝侯腓特烈三世(1657-1713)的继任者于1701年加冕为“普鲁士国王”。仪式需要一个合适的艺术环境,这促使许多艺术家涌向Königsberg,包括来自莱顿的荷兰人,画家贾斯图斯·本图姆,戈特弗雷德·沙尔肯的学生,他和他的儿子菲利普·克里斯蒂安一起到达了新王国的首都。在向他的父亲菲利普·克里斯蒂安·本图姆学习之后。1690年- 1757年)追随著名的威尔曼的脚步,踏上了一段旅程,从此再也没有回到普鲁士。他首先去了布拉格帝国,在那里他与彼得·布兰德(Peter Brandl)合作并皈依了天主教,随后他去了西里西亚。1731年以后,他参加了Wrocław(布雷斯劳)的主教弗朗茨·路德维希·冯·法尔茨-纽堡和修道院院长康斯坦丁·拜尔的艺术项目,后者完成了弗莱伯格和威尔曼开始的项目:Lubiąż的西多会修道院的扩建和装饰。在那里,他制作了欧洲最大的王子大厅油画平台,并完成了他的代表作:用油画覆盖了所有的图书馆墙壁和拱顶。这些亲哈布斯堡王朝的作品是在皇帝查理六世(1685-1740)去世和大选帝侯的曾孙腓特烈二世(1712-1786)对西里西亚的军事入侵前两年完成的。标题中提到的艺术家的命运与Königsberg和Lubiąż交织在一起。两位皈依者都从普鲁士首都出发,途经布拉格到西里西亚,寻求职业上的成熟。他们可以通过荷兰的艺术来源和使用印刷“原型”创建图像的编译方法进行比较。他们内心的差异可以从这些图案的选择中看出,因为他们既追随天主教的鲁本斯,也追随新教的伦勃朗·范·莱因。他们与在中欧政治中发挥关键作用的省份有联系:在这里,霍亨索伦王朝与哈布斯堡王朝争夺中欧的权力。他们见证了赢得西里西亚的比赛,甚至通过创作宣传艺术参与其中。他们两人都为主教弗朗茨·路德维希·冯·法尔茨-纽堡(1664-1732)工作,与皇帝有联系,在西里西亚反宗教改革运动中,他是一种首领。本图姆热切地模仿他的前辈和大师在Lubiąż上的精选作品,我认为他甚至试图在规模和精度上超越他。与威尔曼的艺术竞争可以从Lubiąż图书馆的绘画中看到。在那里,他展示了一幅《绘画寓言》,画中威尔曼的形象被一位天使抱着,而题词称赞他的性格品质,称他为“阿佩莱斯”。这两位画家在Königsberg作为新教徒迈出了职业的第一步,但通过为天主教徒工作而闻名,他们的作品为分析欧洲外围艺术生涯的一般主题,中心和外围之间的关系,以及西里西亚被视为权力工具的重新天主教化的两个阶段提供了有趣的材料。人们通常会指出这两位画家之间的差异,但从来没有人试图表明是什么将他们联系在一起。通过对他们两人的来源、主题和杰出成就的比较,特别是对Lubiąż的比较,可以更全面地了解他们深深沉浸在时代政治中的活动。这幅画面并不像迄今为止那样明确,突出了他们在沿海新教北部和天主教南部之间传播的职业生涯的政治和宣传方面。他们生活的戏剧发生在西里西亚,那里是欧洲多条分界线的交汇处。 迈克尔·卢卡斯·利奥波德·威尔曼(1630-1706)出生于Königsberg(现在俄罗斯加里宁的毕业生),在那里他的第一位老师是Christian Peter,一个富裕的公会画家。在荷兰做了多年的学徒和学习之后,这位年轻的艺术家在1654年Matthias Czwiczek去世后回到了他的祖国,可能是希望在大选帝侯Frederick William(1620-1688)的宫廷里担任画家。引起这位统治者注意的可能是这幅丢失的画,约翰·约阿希姆·冯·桑德拉特这样描述:“火神和他的独眼巨人为马尔斯制作盔甲,为密涅瓦制作盾牌和长矛。”这些努力的失败导致未来的“阿佩莱斯”移民到西里西亚,在那里他在Lubiąż (Leubus)创建了一个家庭绘画工作室,并从加尔文主义转变为天主教,他成为了一名西多会画家,在宗教或世俗中心创造了著名的艺术作品。将他与普鲁士联系起来的是另一幅在他的职业生涯中非常重要的画,这幅画创作于1682年,鲜为人知的《伟大选帝侯作为艺术守护者的神化》。大选帝侯腓特烈三世(1657-1713)的继任者于1701年加冕为“普鲁士国王”。仪式需要一个合适的艺术环境,这促使许多艺术家涌向Königsberg,包括来自莱顿的荷兰人,画家贾斯图斯·本图姆,戈特弗雷德·沙尔肯的学生,他和他的儿子菲利普·克里斯蒂安一起到达了新王国的首都。在向他的父亲菲利普·克里斯蒂安·本图姆学习之后。1690年- 1757年)追随著名的威尔曼的脚步,踏上了一段旅程,从此再也没有回到普鲁士。他首先去了布拉格帝国,在那里他与彼得·布兰德(Peter Brandl)合作并皈依了天主教,随后他去了西里西亚。1731年以后,他参加了Wrocław(布雷斯劳)的主教弗朗茨·路德维希·冯·法尔茨-纽堡和修道院院长康斯坦丁·拜尔的艺术项目,后者完成了弗莱伯格和威尔曼开始的项目:Lubiąż的西多会修道院的扩建和装饰。在那里,他制作了欧洲最大的王子大厅油画平台,并完成了他的代表作:用油画覆盖了所有的图书馆墙壁和拱顶。这些亲哈布斯堡王朝的作品是在皇帝查理六世(1685-1740)去世和大选帝侯的曾孙腓特烈二世(1712-1786)对西里西亚的军事入侵前两年完成的。标题中提到的艺术家的命运与Königsberg和Lubiąż交织在一起。两位皈依者都从普鲁士首都出发,途经布拉格到西里西亚,寻求职业上的成熟。他们可以通过荷兰的艺术来源和使用印刷“原型”创建图像的编译方法进行比较。他们内心的差异可以从这些图案的选择中看出,因为他们既追随天主教的鲁本斯,也追随新教的伦勃朗·范·莱因。他们与在中欧政治中发挥关键作用的省份有联系:在这里,霍亨索伦王朝与哈布斯堡王朝争夺中欧的权力。他们见证了赢得西里西亚的比赛,甚至通过创作宣传艺术参与其中。他们两人都为主教弗朗茨·路德维希·冯·法尔茨-纽堡(1664-1732)工作,与皇帝有联系,在西里西亚反宗教改革运动中,他是一种首领。本图姆热切地模仿他的前辈和大师在Lubiąż上的精选作品,我认为他甚至试图在规模和精度上超越他。与威尔曼的艺术竞争可以从Lubiąż图书馆的绘画中看到。在那里,他展示了一幅《绘画寓言》,画中威尔曼的形象被一位天使抱着,而题词称赞他的性格品质,称他为“阿佩莱斯”。这两位画家在Königsberg作为新教徒迈出了职业的第一步,但通过为天主教徒工作而闻名,他们的作品为分析欧洲外围艺术生涯的一般主题,中心和外围之间的关系,以及西里西亚被视为权力工具的重新天主教化的两个阶段提供了有趣的材料。人们通常会指出这两位画家之间的差异,但从来没有人试图表明是什么将他们联系在一起。通过对他们两人的来源、主题和杰出成就的比较,特别是对Lubiąż的比较,可以更全面地了解他们深深沉浸在时代政治中的活动。这幅画面并不像迄今为止那样明确,突出了他们在沿海新教北部和天主教南部之间传播的职业生涯的政治和宣传方面。他们生活的戏剧发生在西里西亚,那里是欧洲多条分界线的交汇处。 多年前,当我策划“威尔曼-绘画”展览时,我就有了讲述两位以伟大政治为背景的艺术家平行命运的想法(就像普鲁塔克的“平行生活”一样)。“巴洛克艺术家工作坊”(2001年,Wrocław国家博物馆,与萨尔茨堡和斯图加特合作)。本文件将列入安杰伊·科齐耶夫(威尔曼和其他人)发起的项目所附的一卷。17和18世纪西里西亚及其邻国的绘画,绘画和图形艺术,A. koziekov, B. Lejman, Wrocław 2002),但我退出了其出版。我在此发表它,感谢Małgorzata Omilanowska出席2001年我的第一次大型展览的开幕式,以及与我的奥地利、捷克、德国和波兰同事的出色合作。这篇文章,指的是我们当时讨论的话题——就像上面提到的展览一样——我在斯图加特国家画廊的新闻发布会上说的,德国展览的策展人是汉斯·马丁·考尔巴赫,就在世贸中心遇袭两天后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O niebezpiecznych związkach sztuki i polityki na przykładzie „żywotów równoległych” Michaela Willmanna i Philipa Bentuma
Michael Lucas Leopold Willmann (1630–1706) was born in Königsberg (now Kalinin grad in Russia), where his first teacher was Christian Peter, a well -off guild painter. After years of journeys of apprenticeship and learning in the Netherlands, the young artist returned to his homeland, after Matthias Czwiczek’s death in 1654 probably hoping for the position of the painter at the court of Great Elector Frederick William (1620–1688).What served to draw the ruler’s attention to himself was probably the lost painting, described by Johann Joachim von Sandrart as follows: ‘the Vulcan with his cyclops makes armour for Mars and a shield and a spear for Minerva’. The failure of these efforts led the future ‘Apelles’ to emigrate to Silesia, where he created a family painting workshop in Lubiąż (Leubus), and following the conversion from Calvinism to Catholicism, he became a Cistercian painter, creating famous works of art in religious or secular centres of Crown Bohemia. What connects him to Prussia is another painting of great importance in his career, the little -known ‘Apotheosis of the Great Elector as a Guardian of Arts’ from 1682. The successor to Great Elector Frederick III (1657–1713) was crowned in 1701 as the ‘king of Prussia’. The ceremony required an appropriate artistic setting, which prompted many artists to flock to Königsberg, including a Dutchman from Leiden, the painter Justus Bentum, a pupil of Gottfred Schalken, who reached the capital of the new kingdom together with his son Philip Christian. After studying from his father, Philip Christian Bentum (ok. 1690 – po 1757) followed in the footsteps of the famous Willmann, and went on a journey, from which he never returned to Prussia. He went first to imperial Prague, where he collaborated with Peter Brandl and converted to Catholicism, following which he travelled to Silesia. After 1731, he took part in the artistic projects of Bishop Franz Ludwig von Pfalz–Neuburg of Wrocław (Breslau) and Abbot Constantin Beyer, who completed the project begun by Freiberger and Willmann: the extension and decoration of the Cistercian Abbey in Lubiąż. It was there that he made the largest in Europe canvas -painted oil plafond of the Prince’s Hall and completed his opus magnum: covering all the library walls and vaults with painting. Those pro -Habsburg works were finished two years before the death of Emperor Charles VI (1685–1740) and the military invasion of Silesia by Frederick II Hohenzollern (1712–1786), great - -grandson of the Great Elector. The fate of the artists mentioned in the title was intertwined with Königsberg and Lubiąż. Both converts set off for the professional maturity from the Prussian capital via Prague to Silesia. They can be compared by the Dutch sources of their art and a compilation method of creating images using print ‘prototypes’. Their inner discrepancy can be seen in the choice of these patterns, as they followed both the Catholic Rubens and the Protestant Rembrandt Van Rijn. They were connected with the provinces playing a key role in Central -European politics: here the Hohenzollerns competed for power in Central Europe with the Habsburgs. They were witnessesto the game for winning Silesia, and even took part in it by creating propagandistic art. Both of them worked for Bishop Franz Ludwig von Pfalz–Neuburg (1664–1732), associated with the Emperor, a kind of the capo di tutti capi of the Counter -Reformation in Silesia. Bentum eagerly imitated selected compositions of his predecessor and master from Lubiąż, and I think he even tried to surpass him in scale and precision. The artistic competition with Willman is visible in the paintings of the library in Lubiąż. There, he presented an Allegory of Painting, which shows the image of Willmann carried by an angel, while the inscription praising the qualities of his character calls him ‘Apelles’. The work of both painters, who took their first steps in the profession as Protestants in Königsberg, but became famous through their work for Catholics, provides an interesting material for the analysis of the general topic of artistic careers on the periphery of Europe, the relationship between the centres and the periphery, as well as for two stages of re -Catholisation in Silesia treated as an instrument of power. It was usually pointed out how much separates the two painters, but no one has ever tried to show what unites them. The comparison of the sources, motifs, and outstanding achievements of both of them, especially in Lubiąż, gives a more complete picture of their activity deeply immersed in the politics of their times. This picture is not as unambiguous as it has been so far, highlighting the political and propaganda aspects of their career spreading out between the coastal Protestant north and the Catholic south. The drama of their lives took place in Silesia, where the multiple dividing lines of Europe intersected. The idea of narrating the parallel fates of two artists with great Politics in the background (as in he case of Plutarch’s ‘Parallel Lives’) came to my mind years ago when I curated the Exhibition ‘Willmann – Drawings. A Baroque Artist’s Workshop’ (2001, National Museum in Wrocław, in cooperation with Salzburg and Stuttgart). The present paper was to be included in the volume accompanying that project initiated by Andrzej Kozieł (Willmann and Others. Painting, Drawing and Graphic Arts in Silesia and Neighbouring Countries in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. A. Kozieł, B. Lejman, Wrocław 2002), but I withdrew from its publication. I am hereby publishing it, thanking Małgorzata Omilanowska for her presence at the opening of this first great exhibition of mine in 2001, as well for the excellent cooperation with my Austrian, Czech, German, and Polish colleagues. This text, referring to the topic of our discussions at the time – as on the event of the above -mentioned exhibition I spoke at a press conference in Stuttgart’s Staatsgalerie, where the curator of the German exhibition was Hans Martin Kaulbach, exactly two days after the attack on WTC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信