新加强调度安排(NEDA)机制对马来西亚代议制发电成本效率的影响

Previnsha Naidu Poornachendran, R. Verayiah
{"title":"新加强调度安排(NEDA)机制对马来西亚代议制发电成本效率的影响","authors":"Previnsha Naidu Poornachendran, R. Verayiah","doi":"10.1109/ICFTSC57269.2022.10039928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transforming from a vertically integrated environment to a liberalized electricity market is not an easy task, and the rationale behind is the pressure to reduce electricity prices by relying on the enhanced efficiency of power plants and stiff competition in the generation sector. The New Enhanced Dispatch Arrangement (NEDA) is an initiative by EC (Energy Commission) to enhance efficiency in the short run electricity generation competition and drive down electricity prices. NEDA serves as a pre-cursor to the creation of an electricity market in Peninsular Malaysia. This paper analyses the impact of NEDA mechanism on the cost efficiency of a Malaysian Representative System. The PLEXOS simulation is done for two network constraints, which are the Southern and Northern constraint, using four types of load profiles to study the cost impact. To obtain the generation cost for each scenario, the methodology implemented will be Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED). The objective function of SCED is to minimize the total system costs within various technical constraints and limitations. For Southern constraint, the results obtained showed an average of 1.3% cost savings per day, when 1000 MW of NEDA generation is injected into the grid. The annual cost savings is RM 226 million, translating to a 471% savings in generation prices. Expensive generators in the system are now being replaced by the generation from NEDA players which are paid at the System Marginal Price (SMP). On the other hand, for Northern constraint, the annual cost savings is approximately RM 191 million, which is equivalent to 366% cost savings. This will benefit the electricity industry by reducing generation cost, and consumers will be able to enjoy lower and cheaper electricity tariff.","PeriodicalId":386462,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Future Trends in Smart Communities (ICFTSC)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of New Enhanced Dispatch Arrangement (NEDA) Mechanism on the Cost Efficiency of Generation of Malaysian Representative System\",\"authors\":\"Previnsha Naidu Poornachendran, R. Verayiah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICFTSC57269.2022.10039928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transforming from a vertically integrated environment to a liberalized electricity market is not an easy task, and the rationale behind is the pressure to reduce electricity prices by relying on the enhanced efficiency of power plants and stiff competition in the generation sector. The New Enhanced Dispatch Arrangement (NEDA) is an initiative by EC (Energy Commission) to enhance efficiency in the short run electricity generation competition and drive down electricity prices. NEDA serves as a pre-cursor to the creation of an electricity market in Peninsular Malaysia. This paper analyses the impact of NEDA mechanism on the cost efficiency of a Malaysian Representative System. The PLEXOS simulation is done for two network constraints, which are the Southern and Northern constraint, using four types of load profiles to study the cost impact. To obtain the generation cost for each scenario, the methodology implemented will be Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED). The objective function of SCED is to minimize the total system costs within various technical constraints and limitations. For Southern constraint, the results obtained showed an average of 1.3% cost savings per day, when 1000 MW of NEDA generation is injected into the grid. The annual cost savings is RM 226 million, translating to a 471% savings in generation prices. Expensive generators in the system are now being replaced by the generation from NEDA players which are paid at the System Marginal Price (SMP). On the other hand, for Northern constraint, the annual cost savings is approximately RM 191 million, which is equivalent to 366% cost savings. This will benefit the electricity industry by reducing generation cost, and consumers will be able to enjoy lower and cheaper electricity tariff.\",\"PeriodicalId\":386462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Future Trends in Smart Communities (ICFTSC)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Future Trends in Smart Communities (ICFTSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFTSC57269.2022.10039928\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Future Trends in Smart Communities (ICFTSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFTSC57269.2022.10039928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从垂直一体化的环境转变为开放的电力市场并非易事,其背后的理由是依靠发电厂提高效率和发电行业的激烈竞争来降低电价的压力。新加强调度安排(NEDA)是能源委员会的一项措施,旨在提高短期发电竞争的效率,并降低电价。NEDA是在马来西亚半岛建立电力市场的先导。本文分析了NEDA机制对马来西亚代议制成本效率的影响。采用四种类型的负荷分布,对南方和北方两种网络约束进行了PLEXOS仿真,以研究成本影响。为了获得每种情况下的发电成本,将采用安全约束经济调度(SCED)方法。商务及经济发展局的目标功能是在各种技术限制和限制下尽量减少系统的总成本。对于南方约束,获得的结果显示,当1000兆瓦的NEDA发电注入电网时,平均每天节省1.3%的成本。每年节省的成本为2.26亿令吉,相当于发电价格节省了471%。系统中昂贵的发电机现在正被NEDA参与者的发电所取代,这些参与者按系统边际价格(SMP)支付。另一方面,对于北方约束而言,每年节省的成本约为1.91亿令吉,相当于节省了366%的成本。这将通过降低发电成本使电力行业受益,消费者将能够享受更低更便宜的电价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of New Enhanced Dispatch Arrangement (NEDA) Mechanism on the Cost Efficiency of Generation of Malaysian Representative System
Transforming from a vertically integrated environment to a liberalized electricity market is not an easy task, and the rationale behind is the pressure to reduce electricity prices by relying on the enhanced efficiency of power plants and stiff competition in the generation sector. The New Enhanced Dispatch Arrangement (NEDA) is an initiative by EC (Energy Commission) to enhance efficiency in the short run electricity generation competition and drive down electricity prices. NEDA serves as a pre-cursor to the creation of an electricity market in Peninsular Malaysia. This paper analyses the impact of NEDA mechanism on the cost efficiency of a Malaysian Representative System. The PLEXOS simulation is done for two network constraints, which are the Southern and Northern constraint, using four types of load profiles to study the cost impact. To obtain the generation cost for each scenario, the methodology implemented will be Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED). The objective function of SCED is to minimize the total system costs within various technical constraints and limitations. For Southern constraint, the results obtained showed an average of 1.3% cost savings per day, when 1000 MW of NEDA generation is injected into the grid. The annual cost savings is RM 226 million, translating to a 471% savings in generation prices. Expensive generators in the system are now being replaced by the generation from NEDA players which are paid at the System Marginal Price (SMP). On the other hand, for Northern constraint, the annual cost savings is approximately RM 191 million, which is equivalent to 366% cost savings. This will benefit the electricity industry by reducing generation cost, and consumers will be able to enjoy lower and cheaper electricity tariff.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信