V. Paulikas, Linas Jonas Gustas
{"title":"Agrarinis lobizmas Europos Sąjungoje ir Lietuvoje","authors":"V. Paulikas, Linas Jonas Gustas","doi":"10.13165/SMS-13-5-3-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lobbying activities of Lithuanian agricultural interest groups in European and Lithuanian institutions are described in this paper. Lobbying activities of Lithuanian agricultural interest groups have elements of pluralism and corporatism, but elements of corporatism are more numerous. Also, this paper touches upon lobbying activities in the European Commision, the European Parliament and the European Council. Leaders of Lithuanian agricultural interest groups and Lithuanian statesmen were interviewed about interests, lobbyism method effectiveness, access points of Lithuanian agricultural groups and of competitive interest groups. A comparative analysis of the answers of the Lithuanian agricultural group leaders and the Lithuanian statesmen was made. The paper presents conclusions of the above analysis. Lithuanian state officials and politicians which took part in the research interviews stated that the most influential Common Agriculture Policy formers are officials of European Commision and officials of national agricultural ministries. The most influential shapers of Lithuanian farmers` position are top officials in the Chamber of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania and leaders of national farmers’ organisations. They plan and execute lobbying activities in Lithuania and Brussels. Lithuanian farmers` lobbying activities in European Union institutions is weak, but Lithuanian farmers are able to form their position and to defend it. Lithuanian agricultural organisations, except Lithuanian Forest Owners Association, are not registered in European Union Transparency Register. Lithuanian agricultural organisations do not hire professional lobbyists in most cases. The basic methods of Lithuanian farmers` lobbying activities are expert information and campaigns of public opinion forming. In most cases Lithuanian farmers` leaders appeal to Lithuanian government institutions. To European Union institutions Lithuanian farmers appeal through mediators. Those mediators are Lithuanian state officials or European agricultural organisations. Lithuanian farmers rarely appeal to European Union institutions directly. In cases of direct address of EU institutionsLithuanian farmers ask for assistance of the European Parliament members from the Baltic States. Lithuanian farmers lack lobbying abilities. Only 10 percent of Lithuanian farmers participate in activities of agricultural organisations. Lithuanian farmers` lobbying methods sometimes are not suitable, for example, Lithuanian farmers insufficiently value influence of press campaigns to European Union institutions decisions. Also Lithuanian farmers hold a faulty opinion that Lithuanian state officials have more influence in Common Agriculture Policy forming than European Union institutions do. Lithuanian farmers did not achieve their main goal - to equalize direct payments to those of Western European countries. Lithuanian farmers` competitors are agricultural organisations from another European countries, and those organisations are more successful in lobbying activities, mostly because they have long lobbying traditions in their own countries. Lithuanian agricultural organisations could form lobbying coalitions with agricultural organisations from another European states, which have the same interests. If Lithuanian farmers use organic farming, they will have support of environment protection organisations and politicians. It will be difficult for Lithuanian farmers to defend their position in European Union institutions without those allies, because Lithuanian agricultural organisations are not widely known in the key institutions. Also Lithuanian agricultural organisations unite a small number of members and small resources.","PeriodicalId":256611,"journal":{"name":"Societal Studies","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/SMS-13-5-3-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了立陶宛农业利益集团在欧洲和立陶宛机构的游说活动。立陶宛农业利益集团的游说活动具有多元主义和社团主义的因素,但社团主义的因素更多。此外,本文还涉及到欧洲委员会、欧洲议会和欧洲理事会的游说活动。对立陶宛农业利益集团领导人和立陶宛政治家进行了关于利益、游说方法有效性、立陶宛农业集团和竞争性利益集团的接入点的访谈。对立陶宛农业集团领导人和立陶宛政治家的回答进行了比较分析。本文给出了上述分析的结论。参加研究访谈的立陶宛国家官员和政治家说,最有影响力的共同农业政策制定者是欧洲委员会的官员和各国农业部的官员。立陶宛农民地位最有影响力的塑造者是立陶宛共和国农业商会的高级官员和全国农民组织的领导人。他们计划并执行在立陶宛和布鲁塞尔的游说活动。立陶宛农民在欧盟机构中的游说活动很弱,但立陶宛农民有能力形成自己的立场并为之辩护。除立陶宛森林所有者协会外,立陶宛农业组织未在欧盟透明度登记册中登记。在大多数情况下,立陶宛农业组织不雇用专业游说者。立陶宛农民游说活动的基本方法是专家信息和舆论形成运动。在大多数情况下,立陶宛农民领导人向立陶宛政府机构提出申诉。立陶宛农民通过调解人向欧盟机构提出申诉。这些调解人是立陶宛国家官员或欧洲农业组织。立陶宛农民很少直接向欧盟机构申诉。在直接联系欧盟机构的情况下,立陶宛农民要求波罗的海国家的欧洲议会成员提供援助。立陶宛农民缺乏游说能力。只有10%的立陶宛农民参加农业组织的活动。立陶宛农民的游说方法有时不合适,例如,立陶宛农民没有充分重视新闻运动对欧盟机构决策的影响。此外,立陶宛农民持有一种错误的观点,即立陶宛国家官员在共同农业政策制定方面比欧盟机构更有影响力。立陶宛农民没有实现他们的主要目标- -使直接付款与西欧国家的农民相等。立陶宛农民的竞争对手是来自其他欧洲国家的农业组织,这些组织在游说活动中更为成功,主要是因为他们在自己的国家有长期的游说传统。立陶宛农业组织可以与拥有相同利益的其他欧洲国家的农业组织组成游说联盟。如果立陶宛农民使用有机农业,他们将得到环境保护组织和政治家的支持。如果没有这些盟友,立陶宛农民将很难捍卫他们在欧盟机构中的地位,因为立陶宛农业组织在关键机构中并不广为人知。此外,立陶宛农业组织联合了少数成员和少量资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agrarinis lobizmas Europos Sąjungoje ir Lietuvoje
Lobbying activities of Lithuanian agricultural interest groups in European and Lithuanian institutions are described in this paper. Lobbying activities of Lithuanian agricultural interest groups have elements of pluralism and corporatism, but elements of corporatism are more numerous. Also, this paper touches upon lobbying activities in the European Commision, the European Parliament and the European Council. Leaders of Lithuanian agricultural interest groups and Lithuanian statesmen were interviewed about interests, lobbyism method effectiveness, access points of Lithuanian agricultural groups and of competitive interest groups. A comparative analysis of the answers of the Lithuanian agricultural group leaders and the Lithuanian statesmen was made. The paper presents conclusions of the above analysis. Lithuanian state officials and politicians which took part in the research interviews stated that the most influential Common Agriculture Policy formers are officials of European Commision and officials of national agricultural ministries. The most influential shapers of Lithuanian farmers` position are top officials in the Chamber of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania and leaders of national farmers’ organisations. They plan and execute lobbying activities in Lithuania and Brussels. Lithuanian farmers` lobbying activities in European Union institutions is weak, but Lithuanian farmers are able to form their position and to defend it. Lithuanian agricultural organisations, except Lithuanian Forest Owners Association, are not registered in European Union Transparency Register. Lithuanian agricultural organisations do not hire professional lobbyists in most cases. The basic methods of Lithuanian farmers` lobbying activities are expert information and campaigns of public opinion forming. In most cases Lithuanian farmers` leaders appeal to Lithuanian government institutions. To European Union institutions Lithuanian farmers appeal through mediators. Those mediators are Lithuanian state officials or European agricultural organisations. Lithuanian farmers rarely appeal to European Union institutions directly. In cases of direct address of EU institutionsLithuanian farmers ask for assistance of the European Parliament members from the Baltic States. Lithuanian farmers lack lobbying abilities. Only 10 percent of Lithuanian farmers participate in activities of agricultural organisations. Lithuanian farmers` lobbying methods sometimes are not suitable, for example, Lithuanian farmers insufficiently value influence of press campaigns to European Union institutions decisions. Also Lithuanian farmers hold a faulty opinion that Lithuanian state officials have more influence in Common Agriculture Policy forming than European Union institutions do. Lithuanian farmers did not achieve their main goal - to equalize direct payments to those of Western European countries. Lithuanian farmers` competitors are agricultural organisations from another European countries, and those organisations are more successful in lobbying activities, mostly because they have long lobbying traditions in their own countries. Lithuanian agricultural organisations could form lobbying coalitions with agricultural organisations from another European states, which have the same interests. If Lithuanian farmers use organic farming, they will have support of environment protection organisations and politicians. It will be difficult for Lithuanian farmers to defend their position in European Union institutions without those allies, because Lithuanian agricultural organisations are not widely known in the key institutions. Also Lithuanian agricultural organisations unite a small number of members and small resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信