{"title":"托尔斯泰早期对门希科夫的评价(日记片段)","authors":"A. Orlov","doi":"10.24888/2410-4205-2023-34-1-140-150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article publishes fragments of the diaries of the famous publicist, one of the ideologists of Russian state nationalism at the turn of the XIX-early XX centuries, M. O. Menshikov, devoted to the analysis of the work of L. N. Tolstoy. The surviving recordings contain reflections of the publicist on the works of Leo Tolstoy: \"On the limits of happiness\", \"The Kingdom of God is within us\", as well as a draft letter to the writer. The published fragments are a valuable historical source that reveals the relationship between M. O. Menshikov, during his work in the newspaper \"Week\" and L. N. Tolstoy. During this period, correspondence is established between them with responses to each other's work. Since 1901, after the closing of the \"Week\" Menshikov became an employee of A. S. Suvorin's newspaper \"Novoye Vremya\". Traditionally, it is believed that this was a turning point for Menshikov's views. And regarding the assessments of Leo Tolstoy and his work, Menshikov, the Modernist, really changed his position to the diametrically opposite. The research methodology is based on the fundamental principles of historical cognition: the principle of historicism, objectivity and consistency. In the process of preparing the publication, content analysis and ideographic methods were used.","PeriodicalId":128487,"journal":{"name":"History: facts and symbols","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CREATIVITY L. N. TOLSTOY IN THE EVALUATIONS OF M. O. MENSHIKOV OF THE EARLY PERIOD (FRAGMENTS OF THE DIARY)\",\"authors\":\"A. Orlov\",\"doi\":\"10.24888/2410-4205-2023-34-1-140-150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article publishes fragments of the diaries of the famous publicist, one of the ideologists of Russian state nationalism at the turn of the XIX-early XX centuries, M. O. Menshikov, devoted to the analysis of the work of L. N. Tolstoy. The surviving recordings contain reflections of the publicist on the works of Leo Tolstoy: \\\"On the limits of happiness\\\", \\\"The Kingdom of God is within us\\\", as well as a draft letter to the writer. The published fragments are a valuable historical source that reveals the relationship between M. O. Menshikov, during his work in the newspaper \\\"Week\\\" and L. N. Tolstoy. During this period, correspondence is established between them with responses to each other's work. Since 1901, after the closing of the \\\"Week\\\" Menshikov became an employee of A. S. Suvorin's newspaper \\\"Novoye Vremya\\\". Traditionally, it is believed that this was a turning point for Menshikov's views. And regarding the assessments of Leo Tolstoy and his work, Menshikov, the Modernist, really changed his position to the diametrically opposite. The research methodology is based on the fundamental principles of historical cognition: the principle of historicism, objectivity and consistency. In the process of preparing the publication, content analysis and ideographic methods were used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History: facts and symbols\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History: facts and symbols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24888/2410-4205-2023-34-1-140-150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History: facts and symbols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24888/2410-4205-2023-34-1-140-150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章发表了著名的宣传家m·o·门希科夫(M. O. Menshikov)的日记片段,他是十九世纪初俄罗斯国家民族主义的思想家之一,致力于分析l·n·托尔斯泰(L. N. Tolstoy)的作品。现存的录音包括这位公关对列夫·托尔斯泰(Leo Tolstoy)作品的反思:《论幸福的极限》、《上帝的王国就在我们心中》,以及一封写给托尔斯泰的信草稿。出版的片段是宝贵的历史资料,揭示了m.o.门希科夫在《周报》工作期间与l·n·托尔斯泰之间的关系。在此期间,他们之间建立了通信,并对彼此的工作做出了回应。自1901年“周刊”关闭后,门希科夫成为A. S.苏沃林的报纸“新报”的雇员。传统上,人们认为这是门希科夫观点的转折点。关于对列夫·托尔斯泰和他的作品的评价,现代主义者门希科夫,真的改变了他的立场,完全相反。研究方法论以历史认识论的基本原则为基础:历史决定论原则、客观性原则和一致性原则。在准备出版物的过程中,使用了内容分析和表意法。
CREATIVITY L. N. TOLSTOY IN THE EVALUATIONS OF M. O. MENSHIKOV OF THE EARLY PERIOD (FRAGMENTS OF THE DIARY)
The article publishes fragments of the diaries of the famous publicist, one of the ideologists of Russian state nationalism at the turn of the XIX-early XX centuries, M. O. Menshikov, devoted to the analysis of the work of L. N. Tolstoy. The surviving recordings contain reflections of the publicist on the works of Leo Tolstoy: "On the limits of happiness", "The Kingdom of God is within us", as well as a draft letter to the writer. The published fragments are a valuable historical source that reveals the relationship between M. O. Menshikov, during his work in the newspaper "Week" and L. N. Tolstoy. During this period, correspondence is established between them with responses to each other's work. Since 1901, after the closing of the "Week" Menshikov became an employee of A. S. Suvorin's newspaper "Novoye Vremya". Traditionally, it is believed that this was a turning point for Menshikov's views. And regarding the assessments of Leo Tolstoy and his work, Menshikov, the Modernist, really changed his position to the diametrically opposite. The research methodology is based on the fundamental principles of historical cognition: the principle of historicism, objectivity and consistency. In the process of preparing the publication, content analysis and ideographic methods were used.