{"title":"政治运动的个人数据处理及其目的:欧洲委员会现代化公约的应用","authors":"Colin Bennett","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3633976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the center of efforts to combat electoral manipulation and propaganda lies the question of how personal data on individual voters is being processed in political campaigns, and whether or not it is done so legally and ethically. Familiar data protection questions are now at the center of a heated international debate about democratic integrity, and about the rights to free elections enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights. International instruments for the protection of data, such as the modernized Council of Europe’s Convention 108, assume increasing importance in the regulation of data-driven elections, and in the support of broad democratic principles of pluralism and individual autonomy. The main body of the paper analyzes the different, but related, data protection standards that apply directly to the processing of personal data in election campaigns: identifiability and re-identifiability; the definition of sensitive political opinions; political communications; legitimate interests and proportionality; the processing of public data on social media; the obligation of transparency; and automated processing and profiling. Throughout, comparisons are made with parallel provisions within the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and to recent investigations into political campaign practices by data protection authorities in the UK, France, and Canada. Convention 108+ has a unique role to play in the promulgation of good data protection practices for political campaigns and thereby enhancing democratic rights. The modernized Convention 108+ of 2018 is explicitly rooted in a broad aim “to secure the human dignity and protection of the human rights and fundamental freedoms of every individual.” It recognizes that the “right to protection of personal data is to be considered in respect of its role in society and that it has to be reconciled with other human rights and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of expression.” The processing of personal data in political campaigns requires exactly this kind of reconciliation. The history of the Council of Europe and its experience in promoting democratic rights make the organization ideally suited to addressing these critical issues in both advanced industrialized societies, as well as within the more fragile democratic cultures of the Global South.","PeriodicalId":105736,"journal":{"name":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal Data Processing by and for Political Campaigns: The Application of the Council of Europe's Modernised Convention 108\",\"authors\":\"Colin Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3633976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the center of efforts to combat electoral manipulation and propaganda lies the question of how personal data on individual voters is being processed in political campaigns, and whether or not it is done so legally and ethically. Familiar data protection questions are now at the center of a heated international debate about democratic integrity, and about the rights to free elections enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights. International instruments for the protection of data, such as the modernized Council of Europe’s Convention 108, assume increasing importance in the regulation of data-driven elections, and in the support of broad democratic principles of pluralism and individual autonomy. The main body of the paper analyzes the different, but related, data protection standards that apply directly to the processing of personal data in election campaigns: identifiability and re-identifiability; the definition of sensitive political opinions; political communications; legitimate interests and proportionality; the processing of public data on social media; the obligation of transparency; and automated processing and profiling. Throughout, comparisons are made with parallel provisions within the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and to recent investigations into political campaign practices by data protection authorities in the UK, France, and Canada. Convention 108+ has a unique role to play in the promulgation of good data protection practices for political campaigns and thereby enhancing democratic rights. The modernized Convention 108+ of 2018 is explicitly rooted in a broad aim “to secure the human dignity and protection of the human rights and fundamental freedoms of every individual.” It recognizes that the “right to protection of personal data is to be considered in respect of its role in society and that it has to be reconciled with other human rights and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of expression.” The processing of personal data in political campaigns requires exactly this kind of reconciliation. The history of the Council of Europe and its experience in promoting democratic rights make the organization ideally suited to addressing these critical issues in both advanced industrialized societies, as well as within the more fragile democratic cultures of the Global South.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3633976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3633976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
打击选举操纵和宣传活动的核心问题是,在政治竞选中,个人选民的个人数据是如何处理的,以及这样做是否合法和合乎道德。人们熟悉的数据保护问题,如今已成为一场关于民主完整性、以及《欧洲人权公约》(European Convention on Human rights)所规定的自由选举权利的激烈国际辩论的中心。保护数据的国际文书,例如现代化的欧洲委员会第108号公约,在管理数据驱动的选举和支持多元化和个人自治的广泛民主原则方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。本文的主体分析了直接适用于选举活动中个人数据处理的不同但相关的数据保护标准:可识别性和再识别性;敏感政治观点的定义;政治沟通;合法利益和相称性;社交媒体上公共数据的处理;透明度的义务;以及自动化的处理和分析。在整个过程中,与欧盟通用数据保护条例(GDPR)中的平行条款以及英国、法国和加拿大数据保护当局最近对政治竞选实践的调查进行了比较。《第108+号公约》在为政治运动颁布良好的数据保护做法,从而加强民主权利方面可发挥独特作用。2018年修订的《第108+号公约》明确植根于“确保人的尊严,保护每个人的人权和基本自由”的广泛目标。它承认“保护个人数据的权利应考虑到其在社会中的作用,并且必须与其他人权和基本自由,包括言论自由相协调。”在政治竞选中处理个人数据正是需要这种和解。欧洲委员会的历史及其在促进民主权利方面的经验使该组织非常适合在先进的工业化社会以及在全球南方较为脆弱的民主文化中解决这些关键问题。
Personal Data Processing by and for Political Campaigns: The Application of the Council of Europe's Modernised Convention 108
At the center of efforts to combat electoral manipulation and propaganda lies the question of how personal data on individual voters is being processed in political campaigns, and whether or not it is done so legally and ethically. Familiar data protection questions are now at the center of a heated international debate about democratic integrity, and about the rights to free elections enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights. International instruments for the protection of data, such as the modernized Council of Europe’s Convention 108, assume increasing importance in the regulation of data-driven elections, and in the support of broad democratic principles of pluralism and individual autonomy. The main body of the paper analyzes the different, but related, data protection standards that apply directly to the processing of personal data in election campaigns: identifiability and re-identifiability; the definition of sensitive political opinions; political communications; legitimate interests and proportionality; the processing of public data on social media; the obligation of transparency; and automated processing and profiling. Throughout, comparisons are made with parallel provisions within the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and to recent investigations into political campaign practices by data protection authorities in the UK, France, and Canada. Convention 108+ has a unique role to play in the promulgation of good data protection practices for political campaigns and thereby enhancing democratic rights. The modernized Convention 108+ of 2018 is explicitly rooted in a broad aim “to secure the human dignity and protection of the human rights and fundamental freedoms of every individual.” It recognizes that the “right to protection of personal data is to be considered in respect of its role in society and that it has to be reconciled with other human rights and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of expression.” The processing of personal data in political campaigns requires exactly this kind of reconciliation. The history of the Council of Europe and its experience in promoting democratic rights make the organization ideally suited to addressing these critical issues in both advanced industrialized societies, as well as within the more fragile democratic cultures of the Global South.