{"title":"经颅磁刺激的吸引力随着对非基础主义的开放而移动:35位批评家，1765年至1949年","authors":"D. Klein","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3893819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The appeal of The Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS) has moved with openness to non-foundationalism. This paper is devoted to providing evidence of that bivariate relationship. The paper stems from a 2018 article, “Dissing The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” I have pared down the quotations and added nine dissers. This paper evidences more pointedly that the appeal of TMS has moved with openness to non-foundationalism—though I do not mean to suggest that openness to non-foundationalism is the sole factor affecting TMS’s appeal.","PeriodicalId":253619,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TMS’s Appeal Has Moved with Openness to Non-foundationalism: 35 Critics, 1765 to 1949\",\"authors\":\"D. Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3893819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The appeal of The Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS) has moved with openness to non-foundationalism. This paper is devoted to providing evidence of that bivariate relationship. The paper stems from a 2018 article, “Dissing The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” I have pared down the quotations and added nine dissers. This paper evidences more pointedly that the appeal of TMS has moved with openness to non-foundationalism—though I do not mean to suggest that openness to non-foundationalism is the sole factor affecting TMS’s appeal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3893819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3893819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
TMS’s Appeal Has Moved with Openness to Non-foundationalism: 35 Critics, 1765 to 1949
The appeal of The Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS) has moved with openness to non-foundationalism. This paper is devoted to providing evidence of that bivariate relationship. The paper stems from a 2018 article, “Dissing The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” I have pared down the quotations and added nine dissers. This paper evidences more pointedly that the appeal of TMS has moved with openness to non-foundationalism—though I do not mean to suggest that openness to non-foundationalism is the sole factor affecting TMS’s appeal.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
