F. Castro, A. E. M. D. Almeida, Victor Lund Shammas
{"title":"布迪厄给犯罪学的五个教训","authors":"F. Castro, A. E. M. D. Almeida, Victor Lund Shammas","doi":"10.21708/ISSN2526-9488.V3.N6.P31-54.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on a close reading of Pierre Bourdieu’s works, I offer five lessons for a science of crime and punishment: (1) always historicize; (2) dissect symbolic categories; (3) produce embodied accounts; (4) avoid state thought; and (5) embrace commitment. I offer illustrative examples and demonstrate the practical implications of Bourdieu’s ideas, and I apply the lessons to a critique of orthodox criminology.","PeriodicalId":416966,"journal":{"name":"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cinco lições de Bourdieu para a criminologia\",\"authors\":\"F. Castro, A. E. M. D. Almeida, Victor Lund Shammas\",\"doi\":\"10.21708/ISSN2526-9488.V3.N6.P31-54.2019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on a close reading of Pierre Bourdieu’s works, I offer five lessons for a science of crime and punishment: (1) always historicize; (2) dissect symbolic categories; (3) produce embodied accounts; (4) avoid state thought; and (5) embrace commitment. I offer illustrative examples and demonstrate the practical implications of Bourdieu’s ideas, and I apply the lessons to a critique of orthodox criminology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21708/ISSN2526-9488.V3.N6.P31-54.2019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21708/ISSN2526-9488.V3.N6.P31-54.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Drawing on a close reading of Pierre Bourdieu’s works, I offer five lessons for a science of crime and punishment: (1) always historicize; (2) dissect symbolic categories; (3) produce embodied accounts; (4) avoid state thought; and (5) embrace commitment. I offer illustrative examples and demonstrate the practical implications of Bourdieu’s ideas, and I apply the lessons to a critique of orthodox criminology.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
