基于sat的多网格布局设计规则修正的不可行性求解

Nitin Salodkar, Subramanian Rajagopalan, S. Bhattacharya, S. Batterywala
{"title":"基于sat的多网格布局设计规则修正的不可行性求解","authors":"Nitin Salodkar, Subramanian Rajagopalan, S. Bhattacharya, S. Batterywala","doi":"10.1109/VLSID.2015.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, automatic design rule correction (DRC) problem is modeled as a linear program with technology rules and design intents modeled as difference constraints under a minimum perturbation objective. However, these linear programs are often infeasible due to conflicts arising from rules and intents, lack of space or due to incomplete modeling. It is then required to identify problematic constraints and either dilute or drop them to make the linear program feasible. In presence of uniform grid and only difference type constraints, a weighted constraint graph is constructed and infeasibilities are detected as positive cycles. However, this approach breaks down in presence of multiple layer specific grids or discrete track patterns. In this paper, we suggest a novel method for Infeasible Constraint Set Identification (ICSI) for such layouts. Our method transforms the constraint set into a Boolean implications set. Since each implication has only two variables, solving the ICSI problem amounts to determining 2-Satisfiability of the implications set. We then suggest various strategies to resolve infeasibilities.","PeriodicalId":123635,"journal":{"name":"2015 28th International Conference on VLSI Design","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2SAT Based Infeasibility Resolution during Design Rule Correction on Layouts with Multiple Grids\",\"authors\":\"Nitin Salodkar, Subramanian Rajagopalan, S. Bhattacharya, S. Batterywala\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VLSID.2015.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, automatic design rule correction (DRC) problem is modeled as a linear program with technology rules and design intents modeled as difference constraints under a minimum perturbation objective. However, these linear programs are often infeasible due to conflicts arising from rules and intents, lack of space or due to incomplete modeling. It is then required to identify problematic constraints and either dilute or drop them to make the linear program feasible. In presence of uniform grid and only difference type constraints, a weighted constraint graph is constructed and infeasibilities are detected as positive cycles. However, this approach breaks down in presence of multiple layer specific grids or discrete track patterns. In this paper, we suggest a novel method for Infeasible Constraint Set Identification (ICSI) for such layouts. Our method transforms the constraint set into a Boolean implications set. Since each implication has only two variables, solving the ICSI problem amounts to determining 2-Satisfiability of the implications set. We then suggest various strategies to resolve infeasibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 28th International Conference on VLSI Design\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 28th International Conference on VLSI Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLSID.2015.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 28th International Conference on VLSI Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLSID.2015.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,自动设计规则修正(DRC)问题被建模为一个线性规划,技术规则和设计意图被建模为最小摄动目标下的差分约束。然而,由于规则和意图的冲突,缺乏空间或由于建模不完整,这些线性规划往往是不可行的。然后需要识别有问题的约束条件,稀释或删除它们以使线性规划可行。在存在均匀网格和只有差分约束的情况下,构造一个加权约束图,以正环检测不可行性。然而,这种方法在存在多层特定网格或离散轨迹模式时失效。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的非可行约束集识别方法。我们的方法将约束集转换为布尔含义集。由于每个暗示只有两个变量,解决ICSI问题相当于确定暗示集的2-可满足性。然后,我们提出各种策略来解决不可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
2SAT Based Infeasibility Resolution during Design Rule Correction on Layouts with Multiple Grids
Traditionally, automatic design rule correction (DRC) problem is modeled as a linear program with technology rules and design intents modeled as difference constraints under a minimum perturbation objective. However, these linear programs are often infeasible due to conflicts arising from rules and intents, lack of space or due to incomplete modeling. It is then required to identify problematic constraints and either dilute or drop them to make the linear program feasible. In presence of uniform grid and only difference type constraints, a weighted constraint graph is constructed and infeasibilities are detected as positive cycles. However, this approach breaks down in presence of multiple layer specific grids or discrete track patterns. In this paper, we suggest a novel method for Infeasible Constraint Set Identification (ICSI) for such layouts. Our method transforms the constraint set into a Boolean implications set. Since each implication has only two variables, solving the ICSI problem amounts to determining 2-Satisfiability of the implications set. We then suggest various strategies to resolve infeasibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信