B. Gönültas, Sacid Aygün, R. Khayatzadeh, F. Çivitci, Y. D. Gökdel, M. B. Yelten, O. Ferhanoğlu
{"title":"3d打印动态扫描仪的可靠性","authors":"B. Gönültas, Sacid Aygün, R. Khayatzadeh, F. Çivitci, Y. D. Gökdel, M. B. Yelten, O. Ferhanoğlu","doi":"10.1109/IMS3TW.2017.7995204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"3D-printed dynamic structures have arisen as a lower cost and easier to fabricate alternative to miniaturized sensor and actuator technologies. Here, we investigate the reliability of a selected 3D-printed laser scanner, which was initially designed for miniaturized confocal imaging, having 1 x 1 cm2 footprint. The scan-line, 1st resonant frequency and quality factor of 3 devices were monitored for 100,000,000 (hundred million) cycles, and an average deviation of <6% was observed for all three parameters under investigation, for the devices under test. We conclude that 3D printed dynamic structures are promising candidates for a variety of applications, including optomedical imaging applications that demand disposable and low-cost scanning technologies.","PeriodicalId":115078,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Mixed Signals Testing Workshop (IMSTW)","volume":"148 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of 3D-printed dynamic scanners\",\"authors\":\"B. Gönültas, Sacid Aygün, R. Khayatzadeh, F. Çivitci, Y. D. Gökdel, M. B. Yelten, O. Ferhanoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMS3TW.2017.7995204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"3D-printed dynamic structures have arisen as a lower cost and easier to fabricate alternative to miniaturized sensor and actuator technologies. Here, we investigate the reliability of a selected 3D-printed laser scanner, which was initially designed for miniaturized confocal imaging, having 1 x 1 cm2 footprint. The scan-line, 1st resonant frequency and quality factor of 3 devices were monitored for 100,000,000 (hundred million) cycles, and an average deviation of <6% was observed for all three parameters under investigation, for the devices under test. We conclude that 3D printed dynamic structures are promising candidates for a variety of applications, including optomedical imaging applications that demand disposable and low-cost scanning technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Mixed Signals Testing Workshop (IMSTW)\",\"volume\":\"148 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Mixed Signals Testing Workshop (IMSTW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMS3TW.2017.7995204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Mixed Signals Testing Workshop (IMSTW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMS3TW.2017.7995204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
3d打印动态结构作为一种成本更低、更容易制造的替代小型化传感器和执行器技术而出现。在这里,我们研究了选定的3d打印激光扫描仪的可靠性,该扫描仪最初设计用于小型化共聚焦成像,占地面积为1 x 1 cm2。对3个设备的扫描线、第一共振频率和质量因子进行了100,000,000(1亿)个周期的监测,在被测设备中,所有被测设备的三个参数的平均偏差<6%。我们得出的结论是,3D打印动态结构是各种应用的有希望的候选者,包括需要一次性和低成本扫描技术的光学成像应用。
3D-printed dynamic structures have arisen as a lower cost and easier to fabricate alternative to miniaturized sensor and actuator technologies. Here, we investigate the reliability of a selected 3D-printed laser scanner, which was initially designed for miniaturized confocal imaging, having 1 x 1 cm2 footprint. The scan-line, 1st resonant frequency and quality factor of 3 devices were monitored for 100,000,000 (hundred million) cycles, and an average deviation of <6% was observed for all three parameters under investigation, for the devices under test. We conclude that 3D printed dynamic structures are promising candidates for a variety of applications, including optomedical imaging applications that demand disposable and low-cost scanning technologies.