一个用于应用于基于模型的安全关键中间件的安全关键系统功能开发过程的评估框架

D. Darwesh, B. Annighöfer, R. Reichel
{"title":"一个用于应用于基于模型的安全关键中间件的安全关键系统功能开发过程的评估框架","authors":"D. Darwesh, B. Annighöfer, R. Reichel","doi":"10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with an assessment framework to quantifying the impact on development costs by using the selective middleware approach (SMW) for safety-critical system functions. The development of safety-critical system functions is troublesome and time-consuming. Most of the effort is spent on the development and verification of functions such as redundancy management or master/slave management to provide a fault-tolerant platform behavior. The SMW provides an efficient development method for platform management as a middleware used for safety-critical system functions on IMA. It is based on a knowledge-based toolchain, which automatically derives the instance of the platform management middleware from a manually designed high-level system architecture model. In addition to the platform management software, the required design artifacts and verification artifacts are automatically generated. Since the SMW approach supports the software development process with highly automated process activities, it is investigated to what extent the SMW approach reduces the development effort. Therefore, a detailed assessment framework is developed, which covers and evaluates its impact on development phases. Hence, four evaluation views are defined according to the development process, project management process, and the qualification process. The emphasis of this paper is on the so-called project view. Thereby the benefit of the SMW can be identified versus the conventional method. In order to be able to make a quantitative assessment, a set of criteria was defined. For each criterion, a figure of merit is given to quantify the impact. It allows the comparison of different development approaches, e.g., the SMW approach against the conventional IMA development approach. The assessment framework with the project view is applied to evaluate the SMW approach based on the experiences of a high-lift system development. Finally, the efficiency of the SMW is quantified and presented to estimate the approximate profit for the user.","PeriodicalId":112045,"journal":{"name":"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment framework for development processes of safety-critical system functions applied to a model-based safety-critical middleware\",\"authors\":\"D. Darwesh, B. Annighöfer, R. Reichel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with an assessment framework to quantifying the impact on development costs by using the selective middleware approach (SMW) for safety-critical system functions. The development of safety-critical system functions is troublesome and time-consuming. Most of the effort is spent on the development and verification of functions such as redundancy management or master/slave management to provide a fault-tolerant platform behavior. The SMW provides an efficient development method for platform management as a middleware used for safety-critical system functions on IMA. It is based on a knowledge-based toolchain, which automatically derives the instance of the platform management middleware from a manually designed high-level system architecture model. In addition to the platform management software, the required design artifacts and verification artifacts are automatically generated. Since the SMW approach supports the software development process with highly automated process activities, it is investigated to what extent the SMW approach reduces the development effort. Therefore, a detailed assessment framework is developed, which covers and evaluates its impact on development phases. Hence, four evaluation views are defined according to the development process, project management process, and the qualification process. The emphasis of this paper is on the so-called project view. Thereby the benefit of the SMW can be identified versus the conventional method. In order to be able to make a quantitative assessment, a set of criteria was defined. For each criterion, a figure of merit is given to quantify the impact. It allows the comparison of different development approaches, e.g., the SMW approach against the conventional IMA development approach. The assessment framework with the project view is applied to evaluate the SMW approach based on the experiences of a high-lift system development. Finally, the efficiency of the SMW is quantified and presented to estimate the approximate profit for the user.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了一个评估框架,通过对安全关键系统功能使用选择性中间件方法(SMW)来量化对开发成本的影响。安全关键系统功能的开发既麻烦又耗时。大部分工作都花在功能的开发和验证上,例如冗余管理或主/从管理,以提供容错平台行为。SMW为平台管理提供了一种高效的开发方法,作为用于IMA上安全关键系统功能的中间件。它基于一个基于知识的工具链,该工具链从人工设计的高级系统架构模型中自动派生出平台管理中间件的实例。除了平台管理软件之外,还会自动生成所需的设计工件和验证工件。由于SMW方法支持具有高度自动化过程活动的软件开发过程,因此调查SMW方法在多大程度上减少了开发工作。因此,制定了详细的评估框架,涵盖并评估其对开发阶段的影响。因此,根据开发过程、项目管理过程和鉴定过程定义了四种评价视图。本文的重点是所谓的项目观。因此,可以确定SMW与传统方法的优势。为了能够进行定量评估,定义了一套标准。对于每个标准,都给出了一个价值数字来量化影响。它允许对不同的开发方法进行比较,例如,SMW方法与传统的IMA开发方法。基于高扬程系统开发的经验,应用项目观点的评估框架来评估SMW方法。最后,对SMW的效率进行了量化,并给出了估计用户的近似利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment framework for development processes of safety-critical system functions applied to a model-based safety-critical middleware
This paper deals with an assessment framework to quantifying the impact on development costs by using the selective middleware approach (SMW) for safety-critical system functions. The development of safety-critical system functions is troublesome and time-consuming. Most of the effort is spent on the development and verification of functions such as redundancy management or master/slave management to provide a fault-tolerant platform behavior. The SMW provides an efficient development method for platform management as a middleware used for safety-critical system functions on IMA. It is based on a knowledge-based toolchain, which automatically derives the instance of the platform management middleware from a manually designed high-level system architecture model. In addition to the platform management software, the required design artifacts and verification artifacts are automatically generated. Since the SMW approach supports the software development process with highly automated process activities, it is investigated to what extent the SMW approach reduces the development effort. Therefore, a detailed assessment framework is developed, which covers and evaluates its impact on development phases. Hence, four evaluation views are defined according to the development process, project management process, and the qualification process. The emphasis of this paper is on the so-called project view. Thereby the benefit of the SMW can be identified versus the conventional method. In order to be able to make a quantitative assessment, a set of criteria was defined. For each criterion, a figure of merit is given to quantify the impact. It allows the comparison of different development approaches, e.g., the SMW approach against the conventional IMA development approach. The assessment framework with the project view is applied to evaluate the SMW approach based on the experiences of a high-lift system development. Finally, the efficiency of the SMW is quantified and presented to estimate the approximate profit for the user.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信