互动教学法在实际教学理论与实践中的问题

Korotaeva Evgeniya V., Andryunina Anna S.
{"title":"互动教学法在实际教学理论与实践中的问题","authors":"Korotaeva Evgeniya V., Andryunina Anna S.","doi":"10.21209/2658-7114-2022-17-4-131-139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is a generalization and analysis of materials devoted to the actual problem of interactive learning. Introduction. The interest of scientists and educators in the topic of interactivity was recorded at the end of the twentieth century, but at that time the authors considered such learning as a form of interaction between students and the educational environment. In the present period, the specificity of which is due to global digitalization, both interactive learning itself and its interpretation have been transformed. Today, interactive learning is comprehended through various definitions: method, technology, approach, form, means. This testifies to the heterogeneity of approaches to understanding the theoretical foundations, as well as the practice-oriented possibilities of the described phenomenon. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to determine the essential characteristics of interactive learning, to clarify the methodology that ensures productive implementation – both on the part of teachers and on the part of students. The target orientation of the material also determined its novelty. Materials and research methods. The study uses the semantic differential method for a comparative assessment of the characteristics of classes with students of a pedagogical university, conducted both in traditional and interactive forms. Specific results of the study. Analysis of the data showed that students prefer the interactive form of learning, highly appreciating its characteristics such as activity, collectivity, subjectivity, etc. In traditional classes, respondents noted such characteristics as passivity, monologue, regimentation, etc. Discussion of the research results. The data indicate the need to increase in the process of preparing students for classes in an interactive format. This is especially true for future teachers, who in their future professional activities will themselves have to rely on this format of learning and communication. Conclusions and prospects of the study. In general, the study confirms the need for further understanding of the theoretical foundations and practical approaches related to interactive learning, which also implies a conscious transformation of the positions of the subjects of the educational process. Keywords: interactive learning, conceptual analysis, the specifics of teaching in an interactive format, students of a pedagogical university, future teachers","PeriodicalId":335901,"journal":{"name":"Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problems of the Interactive Approach in the Actual Theory and Practice of Teaching\",\"authors\":\"Korotaeva Evgeniya V., Andryunina Anna S.\",\"doi\":\"10.21209/2658-7114-2022-17-4-131-139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is a generalization and analysis of materials devoted to the actual problem of interactive learning. Introduction. The interest of scientists and educators in the topic of interactivity was recorded at the end of the twentieth century, but at that time the authors considered such learning as a form of interaction between students and the educational environment. In the present period, the specificity of which is due to global digitalization, both interactive learning itself and its interpretation have been transformed. Today, interactive learning is comprehended through various definitions: method, technology, approach, form, means. This testifies to the heterogeneity of approaches to understanding the theoretical foundations, as well as the practice-oriented possibilities of the described phenomenon. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to determine the essential characteristics of interactive learning, to clarify the methodology that ensures productive implementation – both on the part of teachers and on the part of students. The target orientation of the material also determined its novelty. Materials and research methods. The study uses the semantic differential method for a comparative assessment of the characteristics of classes with students of a pedagogical university, conducted both in traditional and interactive forms. Specific results of the study. Analysis of the data showed that students prefer the interactive form of learning, highly appreciating its characteristics such as activity, collectivity, subjectivity, etc. In traditional classes, respondents noted such characteristics as passivity, monologue, regimentation, etc. Discussion of the research results. The data indicate the need to increase in the process of preparing students for classes in an interactive format. This is especially true for future teachers, who in their future professional activities will themselves have to rely on this format of learning and communication. Conclusions and prospects of the study. In general, the study confirms the need for further understanding of the theoretical foundations and practical approaches related to interactive learning, which also implies a conscious transformation of the positions of the subjects of the educational process. Keywords: interactive learning, conceptual analysis, the specifics of teaching in an interactive format, students of a pedagogical university, future teachers\",\"PeriodicalId\":335901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21209/2658-7114-2022-17-4-131-139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21209/2658-7114-2022-17-4-131-139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是对交互式学习的实际问题的材料的概括和分析。介绍。科学家和教育工作者对互动性这一话题的兴趣在20世纪末就有了记录,但当时的作者认为这种学习是学生与教育环境之间互动的一种形式。在当今时代,互动学习的特殊性是由于全球数字化,互动学习本身及其解释都发生了转变。今天,交互式学习通过各种定义来理解:方法、技术、途径、形式、手段。这证明了理解理论基础的方法的异质性,以及所描述现象的实践导向的可能性。因此,本文的目的是确定互动式学习的基本特征,阐明确保有效实施的方法——对教师和学生都是如此。材料的目标取向也决定了它的新颖性。材料和研究方法。本研究使用语义差异方法对一所师范大学的学生进行了课堂特征的比较评估,包括传统形式和互动形式。研究的具体结果。数据分析表明,学生更喜欢互动式学习方式,对互动式学习方式的主动性、集体性、主体性等特点非常欣赏。在传统课堂上,受访者注意到诸如被动性、独白性、条理性等特点。研究结果讨论。这些数据表明,需要增加学生为交互式课程做准备的过程。对于未来的教师来说尤其如此,他们在未来的专业活动中将不得不依赖这种学习和交流的形式。结论与展望。总的来说,这项研究证实需要进一步了解与互动学习有关的理论基础和实践方法,这也意味着有意识地转变教育过程中主体的地位。关键词:互动学习,概念分析,互动教学特点,师范院校学生,未来教师
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Problems of the Interactive Approach in the Actual Theory and Practice of Teaching
The article is a generalization and analysis of materials devoted to the actual problem of interactive learning. Introduction. The interest of scientists and educators in the topic of interactivity was recorded at the end of the twentieth century, but at that time the authors considered such learning as a form of interaction between students and the educational environment. In the present period, the specificity of which is due to global digitalization, both interactive learning itself and its interpretation have been transformed. Today, interactive learning is comprehended through various definitions: method, technology, approach, form, means. This testifies to the heterogeneity of approaches to understanding the theoretical foundations, as well as the practice-oriented possibilities of the described phenomenon. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to determine the essential characteristics of interactive learning, to clarify the methodology that ensures productive implementation – both on the part of teachers and on the part of students. The target orientation of the material also determined its novelty. Materials and research methods. The study uses the semantic differential method for a comparative assessment of the characteristics of classes with students of a pedagogical university, conducted both in traditional and interactive forms. Specific results of the study. Analysis of the data showed that students prefer the interactive form of learning, highly appreciating its characteristics such as activity, collectivity, subjectivity, etc. In traditional classes, respondents noted such characteristics as passivity, monologue, regimentation, etc. Discussion of the research results. The data indicate the need to increase in the process of preparing students for classes in an interactive format. This is especially true for future teachers, who in their future professional activities will themselves have to rely on this format of learning and communication. Conclusions and prospects of the study. In general, the study confirms the need for further understanding of the theoretical foundations and practical approaches related to interactive learning, which also implies a conscious transformation of the positions of the subjects of the educational process. Keywords: interactive learning, conceptual analysis, the specifics of teaching in an interactive format, students of a pedagogical university, future teachers
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信