尼日利亚夸拉州学生SSCE经济学多项选择题中容易猜测的题目评估

Mohammed Idris Jimoh, D. S. Daramola, J. Oladele, Adaramaja Lukman Sheu
{"title":"尼日利亚夸拉州学生SSCE经济学多项选择题中容易猜测的题目评估","authors":"Mohammed Idris Jimoh, D. S. Daramola, J. Oladele, Adaramaja Lukman Sheu","doi":"10.29333/aje.2020.512a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study investigated items that were prone to guessing in Senior School Certificate Examinations (SSCE) Economics multiple-choice tests among students in Kwara State, Nigeria. The 2016 West African Senior Secondary Certificate Examinations (WASSCE) and National Examinations Council (NECO) Economics multiple-choice test items were subjected to guessing parameters. This study adopted a descriptive survey research design, carried out in 25 randomly selected public Senior Secondary Schools in Kwara State. A multi-stage sampling technique was used to sample 768 Senior School III students. The instruments used for data collection were 2016 WASSCE and NECO multiple-choice Economics items. Guessing parameter was computed using WinGen IRT software package used to compute and answer research question 2 (What are those 2016 WASSCE and NECO Economics multiple-choice test items prone to guessing?). The hypothesis was tested using the chi-square statistic at 0.05 level of significance. One of the findings revealed that items prone to guessing in WASSCE and NECO were of the same rate. The finding also revealed that no significant difference existed in items guessed in WASSCE and NECO. One of the recommendations revealed that the classroom teachers and professional developers should avoid clauses such as “except”, all of the above”, “none of the above” and “not” to mention a few. This could reduce the guessing tendency in multiple-choice items.","PeriodicalId":314053,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Journal of Education","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Items Prone to Guessing in SSCE Economics Multiple-Choice Tests among Students in Kwara State, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Idris Jimoh, D. S. Daramola, J. Oladele, Adaramaja Lukman Sheu\",\"doi\":\"10.29333/aje.2020.512a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study investigated items that were prone to guessing in Senior School Certificate Examinations (SSCE) Economics multiple-choice tests among students in Kwara State, Nigeria. The 2016 West African Senior Secondary Certificate Examinations (WASSCE) and National Examinations Council (NECO) Economics multiple-choice test items were subjected to guessing parameters. This study adopted a descriptive survey research design, carried out in 25 randomly selected public Senior Secondary Schools in Kwara State. A multi-stage sampling technique was used to sample 768 Senior School III students. The instruments used for data collection were 2016 WASSCE and NECO multiple-choice Economics items. Guessing parameter was computed using WinGen IRT software package used to compute and answer research question 2 (What are those 2016 WASSCE and NECO Economics multiple-choice test items prone to guessing?). The hypothesis was tested using the chi-square statistic at 0.05 level of significance. One of the findings revealed that items prone to guessing in WASSCE and NECO were of the same rate. The finding also revealed that no significant difference existed in items guessed in WASSCE and NECO. One of the recommendations revealed that the classroom teachers and professional developers should avoid clauses such as “except”, all of the above”, “none of the above” and “not” to mention a few. This could reduce the guessing tendency in multiple-choice items.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatolian Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"189 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatolian Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2020.512a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2020.512a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究调查了尼日利亚Kwara州学生在高中毕业证书考试(SSCE)经济学多项选择题中容易猜测的题目。2016年西非高中证书考试(WASSCE)和国家考试委员会(NECO)的经济学多项选择题都是猜测参数。本研究采用描述性调查研究设计,在夸拉邦随机选择的25所公立高中进行。采用多阶段抽样方法对768名高三学生进行抽样。数据收集工具为2016年WASSCE和NECO经济学多项选择题。猜测参数的计算使用WinGen IRT软件包,该软件包用于计算和回答研究问题2(哪些是2016年WASSCE和NECO Economics的多项选择题容易猜测?)采用卡方统计量在0.05显著性水平上检验假设。其中一项发现表明,在WASSCE和NECO中,容易猜测的项目的比例是相同的。这一发现还表明,在WASSCE和NECO中猜测的项目没有显著差异。其中一项建议显示,课堂教师和专业开发人员应避免使用“except”、“all of the above”、“none of the above”和“not”等从句。这可以减少多项选择题的猜测倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Items Prone to Guessing in SSCE Economics Multiple-Choice Tests among Students in Kwara State, Nigeria
The study investigated items that were prone to guessing in Senior School Certificate Examinations (SSCE) Economics multiple-choice tests among students in Kwara State, Nigeria. The 2016 West African Senior Secondary Certificate Examinations (WASSCE) and National Examinations Council (NECO) Economics multiple-choice test items were subjected to guessing parameters. This study adopted a descriptive survey research design, carried out in 25 randomly selected public Senior Secondary Schools in Kwara State. A multi-stage sampling technique was used to sample 768 Senior School III students. The instruments used for data collection were 2016 WASSCE and NECO multiple-choice Economics items. Guessing parameter was computed using WinGen IRT software package used to compute and answer research question 2 (What are those 2016 WASSCE and NECO Economics multiple-choice test items prone to guessing?). The hypothesis was tested using the chi-square statistic at 0.05 level of significance. One of the findings revealed that items prone to guessing in WASSCE and NECO were of the same rate. The finding also revealed that no significant difference existed in items guessed in WASSCE and NECO. One of the recommendations revealed that the classroom teachers and professional developers should avoid clauses such as “except”, all of the above”, “none of the above” and “not” to mention a few. This could reduce the guessing tendency in multiple-choice items.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信