电子和讲座,哪个对谁来说是最好的?

B. Crynes, Barbara A. Greene, Connie Dillon
{"title":"电子和讲座,哪个对谁来说是最好的?","authors":"B. Crynes, Barbara A. Greene, Connie Dillon","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.896649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The immediate goal of this study was to compare a section of 27 students learning by a CD-ROM-Web-self-paced method against a section of 52 students learning by the traditional lecture method. Statistical results are presented comparing achievement of learning objectives, motivation, learning styles, and student characteristics. The experimental students demonstrated strong self-paced learning attributes. Students electing the experimental section had a need for freedom in learning. There was no preference in learning styles between the two groups for the data that was statistically reliable (sensing, active and sequential styles). The experimental class was identically successful in achieving the learning objectives as the traditional class.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lectrons or lectures - which is the best for whom?\",\"authors\":\"B. Crynes, Barbara A. Greene, Connie Dillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2000.896649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The immediate goal of this study was to compare a section of 27 students learning by a CD-ROM-Web-self-paced method against a section of 52 students learning by the traditional lecture method. Statistical results are presented comparing achievement of learning objectives, motivation, learning styles, and student characteristics. The experimental students demonstrated strong self-paced learning attributes. Students electing the experimental section had a need for freedom in learning. There was no preference in learning styles between the two groups for the data that was statistically reliable (sensing, active and sequential styles). The experimental class was identically successful in achieving the learning objectives as the traditional class.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.896649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.896649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的直接目标是比较采用cd - rom网络自定进度方法学习的27名学生和采用传统授课方法学习的52名学生。统计结果比较了学习目标、动机、学习风格和学生特征的成就。实验学生表现出较强的自主学习属性。选择实验课的学生需要学习上的自由。两组在学习风格上没有统计学上可靠的数据偏好(感知型、主动型和顺序型)。实验班与传统班同样成功地实现了学习目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lectrons or lectures - which is the best for whom?
The immediate goal of this study was to compare a section of 27 students learning by a CD-ROM-Web-self-paced method against a section of 52 students learning by the traditional lecture method. Statistical results are presented comparing achievement of learning objectives, motivation, learning styles, and student characteristics. The experimental students demonstrated strong self-paced learning attributes. Students electing the experimental section had a need for freedom in learning. There was no preference in learning styles between the two groups for the data that was statistically reliable (sensing, active and sequential styles). The experimental class was identically successful in achieving the learning objectives as the traditional class.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信