从模具背面进行失效分析

S. Liebert
{"title":"从模具背面进行失效分析","authors":"S. Liebert","doi":"10.1109/IPFA.2001.941484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reproducible back side sample preparation and failure analysis methods becomes increasingly important due to the increasing number of metal levels within semiconductor devices and the ongoing transition to new packages like flip-chip or lead-on-chip. Defects are often located in the lowest chip levels, which make front side electrical defect localization very difficult. Otherwise electrical defect localization in flip-chip and lead-on-chip devices is only possible from the die back side. We developed a failure analysis flow for these die types which contains back side and front side failure analysis methods, consisting of back side photoemission microscopy after bulk Si thinning and electrical recontacting of the die for electrical defect localization. From the type of stress test, test results and fault location, the defect type can often be deduced. With junction leakage, latch up or Al spiking, the die should be prepared for front side analysis, since during further back side preparation, the whole die active area is removed. Gate oxide defects, particles and interrupted conductive interconnects can be analyzed from both the front and back sides of the die. Due to die fragility after bulk Si thinning for electrical defect localization, defect preparation becomes much easier from the back side. After bulk Si removal, optical inspection is possible. Particles or, for example, damage caused by electrostatic overstress might be visible. Gate oxide defects are analyzable by SEM and interrupted conductive interconnects are detectable using passive voltage contrast or electrical probing with AFM.","PeriodicalId":297053,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2001 8th International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. IPFA 2001 (Cat. No.01TH8548)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure analysis from the back side of a die\",\"authors\":\"S. Liebert\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPFA.2001.941484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reproducible back side sample preparation and failure analysis methods becomes increasingly important due to the increasing number of metal levels within semiconductor devices and the ongoing transition to new packages like flip-chip or lead-on-chip. Defects are often located in the lowest chip levels, which make front side electrical defect localization very difficult. Otherwise electrical defect localization in flip-chip and lead-on-chip devices is only possible from the die back side. We developed a failure analysis flow for these die types which contains back side and front side failure analysis methods, consisting of back side photoemission microscopy after bulk Si thinning and electrical recontacting of the die for electrical defect localization. From the type of stress test, test results and fault location, the defect type can often be deduced. With junction leakage, latch up or Al spiking, the die should be prepared for front side analysis, since during further back side preparation, the whole die active area is removed. Gate oxide defects, particles and interrupted conductive interconnects can be analyzed from both the front and back sides of the die. Due to die fragility after bulk Si thinning for electrical defect localization, defect preparation becomes much easier from the back side. After bulk Si removal, optical inspection is possible. Particles or, for example, damage caused by electrostatic overstress might be visible. Gate oxide defects are analyzable by SEM and interrupted conductive interconnects are detectable using passive voltage contrast or electrical probing with AFM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2001 8th International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. IPFA 2001 (Cat. No.01TH8548)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2001 8th International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. IPFA 2001 (Cat. No.01TH8548)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPFA.2001.941484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2001 8th International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. IPFA 2001 (Cat. No.01TH8548)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPFA.2001.941484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

由于半导体器件中金属含量的增加以及向倒装芯片或片上导联等新封装的持续过渡,可重复的背面样品制备和失效分析方法变得越来越重要。缺陷通常位于芯片的最底层,这使得前端电缺陷定位非常困难。否则,倒装芯片和片上导联器件中的电气缺陷定位只能从芯片背面进行。我们为这些类型的模具开发了一套失效分析流程,其中包括背面和正面失效分析方法,包括体硅减薄后的背面光电显微镜和用于电缺陷定位的模具电重接触。根据应力测试的类型、测试结果和故障位置,通常可以推断出缺陷的类型。与结泄漏,闩锁或铝尖峰,模具应准备正面分析,因为在进一步的背面准备,整个模具的活动区域被移除。栅极氧化缺陷,颗粒和中断的导电互连可以从模具的正面和背面分析。由于体硅减薄用于电缺陷定位后的模具易碎性,从背面制备缺陷变得容易得多。去除大量硅后,可以进行光学检查。颗粒或例如静电过度应力造成的损坏可能是可见的。栅极氧化物缺陷可以用扫描电镜分析,中断的导电互连可以用无源电压对比或原子力显微镜电探针检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Failure analysis from the back side of a die
Reproducible back side sample preparation and failure analysis methods becomes increasingly important due to the increasing number of metal levels within semiconductor devices and the ongoing transition to new packages like flip-chip or lead-on-chip. Defects are often located in the lowest chip levels, which make front side electrical defect localization very difficult. Otherwise electrical defect localization in flip-chip and lead-on-chip devices is only possible from the die back side. We developed a failure analysis flow for these die types which contains back side and front side failure analysis methods, consisting of back side photoemission microscopy after bulk Si thinning and electrical recontacting of the die for electrical defect localization. From the type of stress test, test results and fault location, the defect type can often be deduced. With junction leakage, latch up or Al spiking, the die should be prepared for front side analysis, since during further back side preparation, the whole die active area is removed. Gate oxide defects, particles and interrupted conductive interconnects can be analyzed from both the front and back sides of the die. Due to die fragility after bulk Si thinning for electrical defect localization, defect preparation becomes much easier from the back side. After bulk Si removal, optical inspection is possible. Particles or, for example, damage caused by electrostatic overstress might be visible. Gate oxide defects are analyzable by SEM and interrupted conductive interconnects are detectable using passive voltage contrast or electrical probing with AFM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信