股权众筹的二级市场上市:缺失的一环?

Anna Lukkarinen, Armin Schwienbacher
{"title":"股权众筹的二级市场上市:缺失的一环?","authors":"Anna Lukkarinen, Armin Schwienbacher","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3725498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While equity crowdfunding has grown in prevalence, investors have had very few opportunities to exit their investments. To address this, several equity crowdfunding platforms have started considering developing secondary markets for buying and selling shares. Using detailed data from the world’s first secondary market for equity crowdfunding, we investigate whether committing to list on the secondary market after the fundraising campaign leads to greater investor participation and thus helps entrepreneurs to raise more money during the campaign. We find that in the early days of the secondary market, making a pre-commitment to list attracted more investors and larger investment sums. However, this positive effect disappeared after the first 18 months of secondary market operation, most likely because investors realized the lack of liquidity on the secondary market and thus the fact that secondary markets are currently unlikely to constitute a viable exit route. Our findings offer valuable insights to platforms aiming at launching secondary markets and regulators responsible for validating such initiatives. In particular, equity crowdfunding would benefit greatly from liquid secondary markets, which however are difficult to achieve due to high information asymmetries, price formation difficulties, reputational concerns, and competition effects from the primary market.","PeriodicalId":243307,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Regulation (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary Market Listings in Equity Crowdfunding: The Missing Link?\",\"authors\":\"Anna Lukkarinen, Armin Schwienbacher\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3725498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While equity crowdfunding has grown in prevalence, investors have had very few opportunities to exit their investments. To address this, several equity crowdfunding platforms have started considering developing secondary markets for buying and selling shares. Using detailed data from the world’s first secondary market for equity crowdfunding, we investigate whether committing to list on the secondary market after the fundraising campaign leads to greater investor participation and thus helps entrepreneurs to raise more money during the campaign. We find that in the early days of the secondary market, making a pre-commitment to list attracted more investors and larger investment sums. However, this positive effect disappeared after the first 18 months of secondary market operation, most likely because investors realized the lack of liquidity on the secondary market and thus the fact that secondary markets are currently unlikely to constitute a viable exit route. Our findings offer valuable insights to platforms aiming at launching secondary markets and regulators responsible for validating such initiatives. In particular, equity crowdfunding would benefit greatly from liquid secondary markets, which however are difficult to achieve due to high information asymmetries, price formation difficulties, reputational concerns, and competition effects from the primary market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERPN: Regulation (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERPN: Regulation (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3725498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Regulation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3725498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

虽然股权众筹越来越流行,但投资者很少有机会退出他们的投资。为了解决这个问题,一些股权众筹平台已经开始考虑开发二级市场来买卖股票。利用全球首个股权众筹二级市场的详细数据,我们调查了在融资活动后承诺在二级市场上市是否会导致更多的投资者参与,从而帮助企业家在活动期间筹集更多资金。我们发现,在二级市场的早期,预先承诺上市吸引了更多的投资者和更大的投资金额。然而,在二级市场运作的前18个月后,这种积极效应消失了,很可能是因为投资者意识到二级市场缺乏流动性,因此二级市场目前不太可能构成一个可行的退出途径。我们的研究结果为旨在启动二级市场的平台和负责验证此类举措的监管机构提供了有价值的见解。股权众筹尤其受益于二级市场的流动性,但由于信息高度不对称、价格形成困难、声誉问题以及一级市场的竞争影响,二级市场的流动性难以实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Secondary Market Listings in Equity Crowdfunding: The Missing Link?
While equity crowdfunding has grown in prevalence, investors have had very few opportunities to exit their investments. To address this, several equity crowdfunding platforms have started considering developing secondary markets for buying and selling shares. Using detailed data from the world’s first secondary market for equity crowdfunding, we investigate whether committing to list on the secondary market after the fundraising campaign leads to greater investor participation and thus helps entrepreneurs to raise more money during the campaign. We find that in the early days of the secondary market, making a pre-commitment to list attracted more investors and larger investment sums. However, this positive effect disappeared after the first 18 months of secondary market operation, most likely because investors realized the lack of liquidity on the secondary market and thus the fact that secondary markets are currently unlikely to constitute a viable exit route. Our findings offer valuable insights to platforms aiming at launching secondary markets and regulators responsible for validating such initiatives. In particular, equity crowdfunding would benefit greatly from liquid secondary markets, which however are difficult to achieve due to high information asymmetries, price formation difficulties, reputational concerns, and competition effects from the primary market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信