A. Sadowski, W. Poczta, P. Beba, Ewelina Szuba-Barańska
{"title":"Zróżnicowanie produktywności modeli gospodarstw rolnych w UE","authors":"A. Sadowski, W. Poczta, P. Beba, Ewelina Szuba-Barańska","doi":"10.7366/WIR012016/07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article was to define economic efficiency and productivity of soil and labor in the family farms, small scale farms and large scale farms in the European Union Member States. Farm categorization was based on the two main criteria such as structure of family labour force in relation to total labour and on the relation of agriculture income to minimum wage. A farm was regarded as a family farm if the work input made by the family living on a farm exceeded 50% of the total work input calculated as AWU, and income generated per 1 person exceeded the minimum wage. Farms featuring a predominance of hired labour over family labour were considered large scale farms. Other farms were classified as small scale farms. Results of the analysis of the different types of farms depended directly on their category. In large scale farms labour efficiency is typically several times greater than in small scale farms and in family farms. In many countries large scale farms also feature higher soil productivity. According to the analysis, economic efficiency as well as soil and labour productivity were the highest in the Benelux, followed by Germany, Denmark and Sweden. The worst results in the EU were recorded by farms in Romania, Bulgaria and Lithuania.","PeriodicalId":124819,"journal":{"name":"Village and Agriculture","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Village and Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7366/WIR012016/07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是确定经济效率和土壤和劳动力的生产力在家庭农场,小型农场和大型农场在欧盟成员国。农场分类是根据两个主要标准,如家庭劳动力结构与总劳动力的关系和农业收入与最低工资的关系。如果在农场生活的家庭的工作投入超过以AWU计算的总工作投入的50%,并且每个人的收入超过最低工资,则该农场被视为家庭农场。雇佣劳动力多于家庭劳动力的农场被认为是大型农场。其他农场被归类为小规模农场。不同类型农场的分析结果直接取决于它们的类别。大型农场的劳动效率通常比小型农场和家庭农场高几倍。在许多国家,大型农场还具有较高的土壤生产力。根据分析,经济效率以及土壤和劳动生产率在比荷卢经济联盟中最高,其次是德国、丹麦和瑞典。欧盟最差的是罗马尼亚、保加利亚和立陶宛的农场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Zróżnicowanie produktywności modeli gospodarstw rolnych w UE
The aim of the article was to define economic efficiency and productivity of soil and labor in the family farms, small scale farms and large scale farms in the European Union Member States. Farm categorization was based on the two main criteria such as structure of family labour force in relation to total labour and on the relation of agriculture income to minimum wage. A farm was regarded as a family farm if the work input made by the family living on a farm exceeded 50% of the total work input calculated as AWU, and income generated per 1 person exceeded the minimum wage. Farms featuring a predominance of hired labour over family labour were considered large scale farms. Other farms were classified as small scale farms. Results of the analysis of the different types of farms depended directly on their category. In large scale farms labour efficiency is typically several times greater than in small scale farms and in family farms. In many countries large scale farms also feature higher soil productivity. According to the analysis, economic efficiency as well as soil and labour productivity were the highest in the Benelux, followed by Germany, Denmark and Sweden. The worst results in the EU were recorded by farms in Romania, Bulgaria and Lithuania.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信