{"title":"暴躁时代的愤世嫉俗理性","authors":"Nathan Wolff","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198831693.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on Peter Sloterdijk’s Critique of Cynical Reason (1983), this chapter tracks shifts in Mark Twain’s political imagination to help interrogate “cynicism” as a feeling and a hermeneutic. After the 1881 assassination of President Garfield by Charles Guiteau, some commentators looked back to Twain’s The Gilded Age (1873) for his satire of the insanity defense, which Twain saw as a cynical ruse. Yet when Twain returns to a character from The Gilded Age in The American Claimant (1892), the eccentric Colonel Sellers, he rejects the violence of legal reason and affirms a species of lunacy as an irrational-but-necessary optimism. Through a reading of these novels’ unstable tone, this chapter shows how cynicism is defined by the intensity of its own affective involvement in politics (expressed aversively as a smart form of bitterness) and a deep suspicion of others’ “positive” affects as signs of unthinking credulity.","PeriodicalId":312824,"journal":{"name":"Not Quite Hope and Other Political Emotions in the Gilded Age","volume":"266 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cynical Reason in the Cranky Age\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Wolff\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198831693.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on Peter Sloterdijk’s Critique of Cynical Reason (1983), this chapter tracks shifts in Mark Twain’s political imagination to help interrogate “cynicism” as a feeling and a hermeneutic. After the 1881 assassination of President Garfield by Charles Guiteau, some commentators looked back to Twain’s The Gilded Age (1873) for his satire of the insanity defense, which Twain saw as a cynical ruse. Yet when Twain returns to a character from The Gilded Age in The American Claimant (1892), the eccentric Colonel Sellers, he rejects the violence of legal reason and affirms a species of lunacy as an irrational-but-necessary optimism. Through a reading of these novels’ unstable tone, this chapter shows how cynicism is defined by the intensity of its own affective involvement in politics (expressed aversively as a smart form of bitterness) and a deep suspicion of others’ “positive” affects as signs of unthinking credulity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Not Quite Hope and Other Political Emotions in the Gilded Age\",\"volume\":\"266 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Not Quite Hope and Other Political Emotions in the Gilded Age\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198831693.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Not Quite Hope and Other Political Emotions in the Gilded Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198831693.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
借鉴彼得·斯洛特戴克(Peter Sloterdijk)的《愤世嫉俗的理性批判》(Critique of cynicism Reason, 1983),本章追溯了马克·吐温政治想象力的变化,以帮助我们审视“愤世嫉俗”作为一种情感和解释学的意义。1881年加菲尔德总统被查尔斯·吉托暗杀后,一些评论家回顾了吐温的《镀金时代》(1873),因为他讽刺了精神错乱辩护,吐温认为这是一个愤世嫉俗的诡计。然而,当马克·吐温在《美国索赔人》(1892年)中重新提到《镀金时代》中的一个人物——古怪的塞勒斯上校时,他拒绝了法律理性的暴力,并肯定了一种非理性但必要的乐观主义。通过阅读这些小说不稳定的基调,本章展示了玩世不恭是如何被自己对政治的强烈情感参与(厌恶地表达为一种聪明的苦涩形式)和对他人“积极”影响的深刻怀疑所定义的,这是不思考的轻信的标志。
Drawing on Peter Sloterdijk’s Critique of Cynical Reason (1983), this chapter tracks shifts in Mark Twain’s political imagination to help interrogate “cynicism” as a feeling and a hermeneutic. After the 1881 assassination of President Garfield by Charles Guiteau, some commentators looked back to Twain’s The Gilded Age (1873) for his satire of the insanity defense, which Twain saw as a cynical ruse. Yet when Twain returns to a character from The Gilded Age in The American Claimant (1892), the eccentric Colonel Sellers, he rejects the violence of legal reason and affirms a species of lunacy as an irrational-but-necessary optimism. Through a reading of these novels’ unstable tone, this chapter shows how cynicism is defined by the intensity of its own affective involvement in politics (expressed aversively as a smart form of bitterness) and a deep suspicion of others’ “positive” affects as signs of unthinking credulity.