反常的精神-物质影响,自由意志和因果关系的本质

George Williams
{"title":"反常的精神-物质影响,自由意志和因果关系的本质","authors":"George Williams","doi":"10.31156/jaex.24215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes  a framework that supports both free will and anomalous mind-matter interaction (psychokinesis).  I begin by considering the argument by the physicist Sean Carroll that the laws of physics as we understand them rule out psychokinesis (and other modes of psi), and find his claims problematic, in part due to misunderstandings of arguments borrowed from David Hume.  I proceed to consider a more dispositional notion of causality (in contrast to one characterized by universal and necessary laws) which  is more hospitable to both psychokinesis and free will.  I then incorporate recent work from the philosophy of mind and science to arrive at a framework that supports real volition and psychokinesis, which  are intimately linked.  This approach is fundamentally dispositional but grounded in an ontologically prior field of awareness and potentiality.  I also consider that the regularities (or causal natures) we observe in our physical world are ultimately supported by teleological “intentions” within a nonlocal, mind-like quantum ground. ","PeriodicalId":242256,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition","volume":"455 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anomalous Mind-Matter Influence, Free Will, and the Nature of Causality\",\"authors\":\"George Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.31156/jaex.24215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes  a framework that supports both free will and anomalous mind-matter interaction (psychokinesis).  I begin by considering the argument by the physicist Sean Carroll that the laws of physics as we understand them rule out psychokinesis (and other modes of psi), and find his claims problematic, in part due to misunderstandings of arguments borrowed from David Hume.  I proceed to consider a more dispositional notion of causality (in contrast to one characterized by universal and necessary laws) which  is more hospitable to both psychokinesis and free will.  I then incorporate recent work from the philosophy of mind and science to arrive at a framework that supports real volition and psychokinesis, which  are intimately linked.  This approach is fundamentally dispositional but grounded in an ontologically prior field of awareness and potentiality.  I also consider that the regularities (or causal natures) we observe in our physical world are ultimately supported by teleological “intentions” within a nonlocal, mind-like quantum ground. \",\"PeriodicalId\":242256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"455 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.24215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.24215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个框架,支持自由意志和异常的精神-物质相互作用(精神运动)。我首先考虑物理学家肖恩·卡罗尔(Sean Carroll)的论点,即我们所理解的物理定律排除了心灵运动(和其他模式的psi),并发现他的主张有问题,部分原因是误解了从大卫·休谟(David Hume)那里借用的论点。我继续考虑一种更倾向于性格的因果关系概念(与以普遍规律和必然规律为特征的因果关系概念相反),它更有利于精神能动和自由意志。然后,我将最近的思想哲学和科学研究结合起来,得出一个支持真正的意志和精神运动的框架,这两者是密切相关的。这种方法基本上是倾向的,但植根于意识和潜力的本体论先验领域。我还认为,我们在物理世界中观察到的规律(或因果性质)最终是由非局部的、类似心灵的量子基础中的目的论“意图”所支持的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anomalous Mind-Matter Influence, Free Will, and the Nature of Causality
This paper proposes  a framework that supports both free will and anomalous mind-matter interaction (psychokinesis).  I begin by considering the argument by the physicist Sean Carroll that the laws of physics as we understand them rule out psychokinesis (and other modes of psi), and find his claims problematic, in part due to misunderstandings of arguments borrowed from David Hume.  I proceed to consider a more dispositional notion of causality (in contrast to one characterized by universal and necessary laws) which  is more hospitable to both psychokinesis and free will.  I then incorporate recent work from the philosophy of mind and science to arrive at a framework that supports real volition and psychokinesis, which  are intimately linked.  This approach is fundamentally dispositional but grounded in an ontologically prior field of awareness and potentiality.  I also consider that the regularities (or causal natures) we observe in our physical world are ultimately supported by teleological “intentions” within a nonlocal, mind-like quantum ground. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信