冠状动脉钙评分与COVID-19预后的关系

Sh. Soleimani, O. Motamedi, G. Amjad, S. Bagheri, M. Moadab, N. Yazdipour, M. Benam
{"title":"冠状动脉钙评分与COVID-19预后的关系","authors":"Sh. Soleimani, O. Motamedi, G. Amjad, S. Bagheri, M. Moadab, N. Yazdipour, M. Benam","doi":"10.56936/18290825-2023.17.2-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Research has examined the relationships between coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and mortality, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit admissions. This paper summarizes the predictive value of coronary artery calcification scoring for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in terms of mortality, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit admission.\nMethods: The patients in this single-center retrospective analysis have COVID-19 and were hospitalized at the Firouzabadi hospital in Tehran between 2019 and 2020. coronary artery calcificationscore was estimated based on chest non-contrast CT scans on the day of admission. Based on the coronary artery calcification score, the patients were categorized into Very Low, Mild to Moderate, and Moderate to Severe. After a univariate analysis of the critical factors, odds ratio (OR) analysis and multivariate analysis of variables that could be linked to COVID-19 advancement were carried out.\nResults: a total of 719 patients were examined. Among them, 414 patients were men. Mortality with a 17.1 % prevalence was statistically significant between CAS score levels (P < 0.001). This factor has high OR with mild to moderate and moderate to severe CAS (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.71 to 3.06, and OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.84 to 3.57). Oxygen saturation was a significant statistic between CAS score levels (P = 0.02). This factor has a high OR with mild to moderate and moderate to severe CAS (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.71 to 3.60, and OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 0.89 to 2.9). There was no statistical difference between the groups’ outcomes of mechanical ventilation and admission types. \nConclusion: In this study, the coronary artery calcification scores of patients with COVID-19 were compared, while the outcomes of interest mortality, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unitU admission were closely investigated. In light of these findings, coronary artery calcificationscoring can help in patient stratification, enabling earlier therapies for disorders to progress quickly.","PeriodicalId":151964,"journal":{"name":"NAMJ 17 (2023)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between coronary artery calcium score and COVID-19 prognosis\",\"authors\":\"Sh. Soleimani, O. Motamedi, G. Amjad, S. Bagheri, M. Moadab, N. Yazdipour, M. Benam\",\"doi\":\"10.56936/18290825-2023.17.2-51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Research has examined the relationships between coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and mortality, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit admissions. This paper summarizes the predictive value of coronary artery calcification scoring for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in terms of mortality, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit admission.\\nMethods: The patients in this single-center retrospective analysis have COVID-19 and were hospitalized at the Firouzabadi hospital in Tehran between 2019 and 2020. coronary artery calcificationscore was estimated based on chest non-contrast CT scans on the day of admission. Based on the coronary artery calcification score, the patients were categorized into Very Low, Mild to Moderate, and Moderate to Severe. After a univariate analysis of the critical factors, odds ratio (OR) analysis and multivariate analysis of variables that could be linked to COVID-19 advancement were carried out.\\nResults: a total of 719 patients were examined. Among them, 414 patients were men. Mortality with a 17.1 % prevalence was statistically significant between CAS score levels (P < 0.001). This factor has high OR with mild to moderate and moderate to severe CAS (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.71 to 3.06, and OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.84 to 3.57). Oxygen saturation was a significant statistic between CAS score levels (P = 0.02). This factor has a high OR with mild to moderate and moderate to severe CAS (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.71 to 3.60, and OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 0.89 to 2.9). There was no statistical difference between the groups’ outcomes of mechanical ventilation and admission types. \\nConclusion: In this study, the coronary artery calcification scores of patients with COVID-19 were compared, while the outcomes of interest mortality, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unitU admission were closely investigated. In light of these findings, coronary artery calcificationscoring can help in patient stratification, enabling earlier therapies for disorders to progress quickly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NAMJ 17 (2023)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NAMJ 17 (2023)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56936/18290825-2023.17.2-51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAMJ 17 (2023)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56936/18290825-2023.17.2-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究已经检查了冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分与死亡率、机械通气和重症监护病房入院之间的关系。总结冠状动脉钙化评分对住院COVID-19患者病死率、机械通气、重症监护病房入住的预测价值。方法:本研究采用单中心回顾性分析,选取2019 - 2020年在德黑兰Firouzabadi医院住院的新冠肺炎患者。冠状动脉钙化评分是根据入院当天的胸部非对比CT扫描来估计的。根据冠状动脉钙化评分,将患者分为极低、轻度至中度、中度至重度。在对关键因素进行单因素分析后,对可能与COVID-19进展相关的变量进行比值比(OR)分析和多因素分析。结果:共检查719例患者。其中男性414例。死亡率为17.1%,在CAS评分水平之间具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。该因子与轻至中度、中至重度CAS具有高OR (OR: 2.14;95% CI: 1.71 ~ 3.06, OR: 2.31;95% CI: 1.84 ~ 3.57)。两组间血氧饱和度差异有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。该因子与轻至中度、中至重度CAS具有高OR (OR: 1.09;95% CI: 0.71 ~ 3.60, OR: 2.38;95% CI: 0.89 ~ 2.9)。两组机械通气及入院方式的结果无统计学差异。结论:本研究比较了COVID-19患者冠状动脉钙化评分,并密切观察了兴趣死亡率、机械通气和重症监护病房入住情况。鉴于这些发现,冠状动脉钙化评分可以帮助患者分层,使疾病的早期治疗能够快速进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between coronary artery calcium score and COVID-19 prognosis
Background: Research has examined the relationships between coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and mortality, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit admissions. This paper summarizes the predictive value of coronary artery calcification scoring for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in terms of mortality, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit admission. Methods: The patients in this single-center retrospective analysis have COVID-19 and were hospitalized at the Firouzabadi hospital in Tehran between 2019 and 2020. coronary artery calcificationscore was estimated based on chest non-contrast CT scans on the day of admission. Based on the coronary artery calcification score, the patients were categorized into Very Low, Mild to Moderate, and Moderate to Severe. After a univariate analysis of the critical factors, odds ratio (OR) analysis and multivariate analysis of variables that could be linked to COVID-19 advancement were carried out. Results: a total of 719 patients were examined. Among them, 414 patients were men. Mortality with a 17.1 % prevalence was statistically significant between CAS score levels (P < 0.001). This factor has high OR with mild to moderate and moderate to severe CAS (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.71 to 3.06, and OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.84 to 3.57). Oxygen saturation was a significant statistic between CAS score levels (P = 0.02). This factor has a high OR with mild to moderate and moderate to severe CAS (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.71 to 3.60, and OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 0.89 to 2.9). There was no statistical difference between the groups’ outcomes of mechanical ventilation and admission types. Conclusion: In this study, the coronary artery calcification scores of patients with COVID-19 were compared, while the outcomes of interest mortality, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unitU admission were closely investigated. In light of these findings, coronary artery calcificationscoring can help in patient stratification, enabling earlier therapies for disorders to progress quickly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信