税收福利改革与劳动力市场:来自比利时和其他欧盟国家的证据

Kristian Orsini
{"title":"税收福利改革与劳动力市场:来自比利时和其他欧盟国家的证据","authors":"Kristian Orsini","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.898847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last decade, several EU countries have tried to tackle unemployment and low activity rates through extensive tax cuts. In an efiort to encourage the taking up of work - especially amongst the less productive workers - policymakers have shown increasing interest in targeted tax and social security contribution rebates as well as in beneflts conditional on being in employment. This paper surveys recent tax-beneflt reforms in Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, The UK, France and Belgium, focussing in particular on the reforms carried out in the latter. The potential labor supply efiect of the Belgian reforms are assessed via a discrete hours labor supply model. The results are then compared to similar evaluations of reforms implemented in the aforementioned countries. Results suggest that: (i) generalized tax cut are not always efiective in stimulating labor supply; (ii) in several central continental Europe, social security contributions play a major role in determining the incentives to take up work; (iii) joint assessment of income for both purposes of taxation and beneflt eligibility has unambiguous negative efiects on the labor supply of secondary earners (i.e. mostly women); (iv) targeted reductions in taxes and social security contributions, as well as beneflts conditioned on employment are efiective means to promote employment, but (v) e‐cient design of these policies is of greatest importance in order to counter potential negative incentive efiects on the population already in employment.","PeriodicalId":285024,"journal":{"name":"Unemployment Insurance eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax-Benefits Reforms and the Labor Market: Evidence from Belgium and Other EU Countries\",\"authors\":\"Kristian Orsini\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.898847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the last decade, several EU countries have tried to tackle unemployment and low activity rates through extensive tax cuts. In an efiort to encourage the taking up of work - especially amongst the less productive workers - policymakers have shown increasing interest in targeted tax and social security contribution rebates as well as in beneflts conditional on being in employment. This paper surveys recent tax-beneflt reforms in Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, The UK, France and Belgium, focussing in particular on the reforms carried out in the latter. The potential labor supply efiect of the Belgian reforms are assessed via a discrete hours labor supply model. The results are then compared to similar evaluations of reforms implemented in the aforementioned countries. Results suggest that: (i) generalized tax cut are not always efiective in stimulating labor supply; (ii) in several central continental Europe, social security contributions play a major role in determining the incentives to take up work; (iii) joint assessment of income for both purposes of taxation and beneflt eligibility has unambiguous negative efiects on the labor supply of secondary earners (i.e. mostly women); (iv) targeted reductions in taxes and social security contributions, as well as beneflts conditioned on employment are efiective means to promote employment, but (v) e‐cient design of these policies is of greatest importance in order to counter potential negative incentive efiects on the population already in employment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unemployment Insurance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unemployment Insurance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.898847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unemployment Insurance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.898847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

在过去十年中,一些欧盟国家试图通过大规模减税来解决失业和低经济活动率问题。为了鼓励工作- -特别是在生产力较低的工人中- -政策制定者对有针对性的税收和社会保障缴款退税以及以就业为条件的福利表现出越来越大的兴趣。本文调查了德国、荷兰、意大利、英国、法国和比利时最近的税收优惠改革,特别关注后者进行的改革。通过离散小时劳动力供给模型对比利时改革的潜在劳动力供给效应进行了评估。然后将结果与上述国家实施的改革的类似评价进行比较。结果表明:(1)普遍减税对刺激劳动力供给并不总是有效的;在几个中欧大陆,社会保险缴款在决定工作的动机方面起着主要作用;为征税和领取福利资格而联合评估收入对中等收入者(即主要是妇女)的劳动力供应有明确的负面影响;有针对性地减少税收和社会保险缴款以及以就业为条件的福利是促进就业的有效手段,但是,为了消除对已经就业的人口可能产生的消极激励作用,有效地设计这些政策是最重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tax-Benefits Reforms and the Labor Market: Evidence from Belgium and Other EU Countries
During the last decade, several EU countries have tried to tackle unemployment and low activity rates through extensive tax cuts. In an efiort to encourage the taking up of work - especially amongst the less productive workers - policymakers have shown increasing interest in targeted tax and social security contribution rebates as well as in beneflts conditional on being in employment. This paper surveys recent tax-beneflt reforms in Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, The UK, France and Belgium, focussing in particular on the reforms carried out in the latter. The potential labor supply efiect of the Belgian reforms are assessed via a discrete hours labor supply model. The results are then compared to similar evaluations of reforms implemented in the aforementioned countries. Results suggest that: (i) generalized tax cut are not always efiective in stimulating labor supply; (ii) in several central continental Europe, social security contributions play a major role in determining the incentives to take up work; (iii) joint assessment of income for both purposes of taxation and beneflt eligibility has unambiguous negative efiects on the labor supply of secondary earners (i.e. mostly women); (iv) targeted reductions in taxes and social security contributions, as well as beneflts conditioned on employment are efiective means to promote employment, but (v) e‐cient design of these policies is of greatest importance in order to counter potential negative incentive efiects on the population already in employment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信