{"title":"不惜一切代价送一个健康的孩子?","authors":"Eberhard Schockenhoff","doi":"10.30965/29498570-04602004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article evaluates the various arguments in favour of a restricted use of PG D in certain cases with the aim of judging the moral acceptability of PGD as a whole. In particular, it asks: whether PGD is no more than an earlier application of prenatal diagnosis; whether there is a danger that the restriction to certain cases will weaken in the future; whether, as the Embryo Protecction Act demandss, only non-totipotent cells are used in PGD; whether and how PGD strengthens the parent’s freedom of choice; whether the duty to prevent human suffering is a reason to employ PGD; and whether the sceptical attitude against PGD leads researchers into a moral dilemma.","PeriodicalId":288000,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ein gesundes Kind um jeden Preis?\",\"authors\":\"Eberhard Schockenhoff\",\"doi\":\"10.30965/29498570-04602004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article evaluates the various arguments in favour of a restricted use of PG D in certain cases with the aim of judging the moral acceptability of PGD as a whole. In particular, it asks: whether PGD is no more than an earlier application of prenatal diagnosis; whether there is a danger that the restriction to certain cases will weaken in the future; whether, as the Embryo Protecction Act demandss, only non-totipotent cells are used in PGD; whether and how PGD strengthens the parent’s freedom of choice; whether the duty to prevent human suffering is a reason to employ PGD; and whether the sceptical attitude against PGD leads researchers into a moral dilemma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30965/29498570-04602004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/29498570-04602004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article evaluates the various arguments in favour of a restricted use of PG D in certain cases with the aim of judging the moral acceptability of PGD as a whole. In particular, it asks: whether PGD is no more than an earlier application of prenatal diagnosis; whether there is a danger that the restriction to certain cases will weaken in the future; whether, as the Embryo Protecction Act demandss, only non-totipotent cells are used in PGD; whether and how PGD strengthens the parent’s freedom of choice; whether the duty to prevent human suffering is a reason to employ PGD; and whether the sceptical attitude against PGD leads researchers into a moral dilemma.