不惜一切代价送一个健康的孩子?

Eberhard Schockenhoff
{"title":"不惜一切代价送一个健康的孩子?","authors":"Eberhard Schockenhoff","doi":"10.30965/29498570-04602004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article evaluates the various arguments in favour of a restricted use of PG D in certain cases with the aim of judging the moral acceptability of PGD as a whole. In particular, it asks: whether PGD is no more than an earlier application of prenatal diagnosis; whether there is a danger that the restriction to certain cases will weaken in the future; whether, as the Embryo Protecction Act demandss, only non-totipotent cells are used in PGD; whether and how PGD strengthens the parent’s freedom of choice; whether the duty to prevent human suffering is a reason to employ PGD; and whether the sceptical attitude against PGD leads researchers into a moral dilemma.","PeriodicalId":288000,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ein gesundes Kind um jeden Preis?\",\"authors\":\"Eberhard Schockenhoff\",\"doi\":\"10.30965/29498570-04602004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article evaluates the various arguments in favour of a restricted use of PG D in certain cases with the aim of judging the moral acceptability of PGD as a whole. In particular, it asks: whether PGD is no more than an earlier application of prenatal diagnosis; whether there is a danger that the restriction to certain cases will weaken in the future; whether, as the Embryo Protecction Act demandss, only non-totipotent cells are used in PGD; whether and how PGD strengthens the parent’s freedom of choice; whether the duty to prevent human suffering is a reason to employ PGD; and whether the sceptical attitude against PGD leads researchers into a moral dilemma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30965/29498570-04602004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/29498570-04602004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文评估了在某些情况下支持限制使用PGD的各种论点,目的是判断PGD作为一个整体的道德可接受性。特别是,它问:PGD是否只不过是产前诊断的早期应用;未来对某些个案的限制是否有减弱的危险;是否如《胚胎保护法》所要求的那样,只有非全能细胞才能用于PGD;PGD是否以及如何加强父母的选择自由;防止人类受苦的责任是否为雇用PGD的理由;以及对PGD的怀疑态度是否会使研究人员陷入道德困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ein gesundes Kind um jeden Preis?
This article evaluates the various arguments in favour of a restricted use of PG D in certain cases with the aim of judging the moral acceptability of PGD as a whole. In particular, it asks: whether PGD is no more than an earlier application of prenatal diagnosis; whether there is a danger that the restriction to certain cases will weaken in the future; whether, as the Embryo Protecction Act demandss, only non-totipotent cells are used in PGD; whether and how PGD strengthens the parent’s freedom of choice; whether the duty to prevent human suffering is a reason to employ PGD; and whether the sceptical attitude against PGD leads researchers into a moral dilemma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信