从风险比和Child-Pugh评分改善角度确定适合肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的中草药产品:基于“Netmeta”的频率统计分析

Kakei Lo
{"title":"从风险比和Child-Pugh评分改善角度确定适合肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的中草药产品:基于“Netmeta”的频率统计分析","authors":"Kakei Lo","doi":"10.30958/ajhms.9-4-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) causes high mortality and global burden. In addition to the conventional western treatments, HCC patients are actively seeking adjuvant therapies, such as traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), hoping to improve treatment outcomes and prolong survival. Until 2021, only two network meta-analyses (NMAs) compare different HCC treatments, which, however, did not compare all forms of TCM formulations, and there is no evidence informing which TCM works best for an outcome. This frequentist NMA, conducted with R (version 4.0.2) under the random-effect model, ranks all TCM integrative treatments by P-scores with its ‘netmeta’ package for two outcomes, survival (hazard ratio) and Child-Pugh score improvement (odds ratio). There are 289 RCTs retrieved from literature screening for NMA. For survival, the combination of Buxu Huadu decoction and Jinshuibao capsule ranks first overall (P-score 0.9745, HR 0.1962). Fugan injection is the best TCM injection (P-score 0.9809, HR 0.3051). Shugan Huazhuo decoction (P-score 0.9448, HR 0.3728) and Peiyuan Guben capsule (P-score 0.9677, HR 0.2946) are the best decoction and product for oral administration respectively. Aidi injection ranks first in Child-Pugh score improvement (P-score 0.7539, OR 4.3429). This NMA guides clinical decision making in all kinds of settings. Multi-centered RCTs are warranted for further verification. Keywords: traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), network meta-analysis (NMA), adjuvant treatments, frequentist statistical analysis","PeriodicalId":196877,"journal":{"name":"Athens Journal of Health and Medical Sciences","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the Well-suited Chinese Herbal Products for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients in Terms of Hazard Ratio and Child-Pugh Score Improvement: A Frequentist Statistical Analysis Applying ‘Netmeta’\",\"authors\":\"Kakei Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/ajhms.9-4-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) causes high mortality and global burden. In addition to the conventional western treatments, HCC patients are actively seeking adjuvant therapies, such as traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), hoping to improve treatment outcomes and prolong survival. Until 2021, only two network meta-analyses (NMAs) compare different HCC treatments, which, however, did not compare all forms of TCM formulations, and there is no evidence informing which TCM works best for an outcome. This frequentist NMA, conducted with R (version 4.0.2) under the random-effect model, ranks all TCM integrative treatments by P-scores with its ‘netmeta’ package for two outcomes, survival (hazard ratio) and Child-Pugh score improvement (odds ratio). There are 289 RCTs retrieved from literature screening for NMA. For survival, the combination of Buxu Huadu decoction and Jinshuibao capsule ranks first overall (P-score 0.9745, HR 0.1962). Fugan injection is the best TCM injection (P-score 0.9809, HR 0.3051). Shugan Huazhuo decoction (P-score 0.9448, HR 0.3728) and Peiyuan Guben capsule (P-score 0.9677, HR 0.2946) are the best decoction and product for oral administration respectively. Aidi injection ranks first in Child-Pugh score improvement (P-score 0.7539, OR 4.3429). This NMA guides clinical decision making in all kinds of settings. Multi-centered RCTs are warranted for further verification. Keywords: traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), network meta-analysis (NMA), adjuvant treatments, frequentist statistical analysis\",\"PeriodicalId\":196877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Athens Journal of Health and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Athens Journal of Health and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajhms.9-4-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athens Journal of Health and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajhms.9-4-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肝细胞癌(HCC)导致高死亡率和全球负担。HCC患者在常规西医治疗的基础上,积极寻求中药等辅助治疗,希望改善治疗效果,延长生存期。直到2021年,只有两项网络荟萃分析(nma)比较了不同的HCC治疗方法,然而,这些分析并没有比较所有形式的中药配方,也没有证据表明哪种中药对结果最有效。在随机效应模型下使用R(版本4.0.2)进行的频率NMA,通过其“netmeta”包对所有中医综合治疗的两项结果(生存(风险比)和Child-Pugh评分改善(优势比))的p得分进行排名。从文献筛选NMA中检索到289项随机对照试验。在生存率方面,补虚花都汤联合金水宝胶囊综合生存率最高(p值0.9745,HR 0.1962)。复肝注射液疗效最佳(p值0.9809,HR 0.3051)。疏肝化浊汤(p值为0.9448,HR为0.3728)和培源固本胶囊(p值为0.9677,HR为0.2946)分别为口服最佳汤剂和最佳制剂。爱地注射液在Child-Pugh评分改善方面排名第一(p值0.7539,OR 4.3429)。该NMA指导各种情况下的临床决策。多中心随机对照试验值得进一步验证。关键词:中医,肝细胞癌,网络荟萃分析,辅助治疗,频率统计分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying the Well-suited Chinese Herbal Products for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients in Terms of Hazard Ratio and Child-Pugh Score Improvement: A Frequentist Statistical Analysis Applying ‘Netmeta’
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) causes high mortality and global burden. In addition to the conventional western treatments, HCC patients are actively seeking adjuvant therapies, such as traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), hoping to improve treatment outcomes and prolong survival. Until 2021, only two network meta-analyses (NMAs) compare different HCC treatments, which, however, did not compare all forms of TCM formulations, and there is no evidence informing which TCM works best for an outcome. This frequentist NMA, conducted with R (version 4.0.2) under the random-effect model, ranks all TCM integrative treatments by P-scores with its ‘netmeta’ package for two outcomes, survival (hazard ratio) and Child-Pugh score improvement (odds ratio). There are 289 RCTs retrieved from literature screening for NMA. For survival, the combination of Buxu Huadu decoction and Jinshuibao capsule ranks first overall (P-score 0.9745, HR 0.1962). Fugan injection is the best TCM injection (P-score 0.9809, HR 0.3051). Shugan Huazhuo decoction (P-score 0.9448, HR 0.3728) and Peiyuan Guben capsule (P-score 0.9677, HR 0.2946) are the best decoction and product for oral administration respectively. Aidi injection ranks first in Child-Pugh score improvement (P-score 0.7539, OR 4.3429). This NMA guides clinical decision making in all kinds of settings. Multi-centered RCTs are warranted for further verification. Keywords: traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), network meta-analysis (NMA), adjuvant treatments, frequentist statistical analysis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信