利用FMM、FEM和FDT进行吸收建模

N. Anttu, H. Mäntynen, T. Sadi, A. Matikainen, J. Turunen, H. Lipsanen
{"title":"利用FMM、FEM和FDT进行吸收建模","authors":"N. Anttu, H. Mäntynen, T. Sadi, A. Matikainen, J. Turunen, H. Lipsanen","doi":"10.1109/NUSOD.2019.8806882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Absorption modeling is at the core of the design process of nanostructured solar cells and photodetectors. We compare the performance of three of the most popular numerical modeling methods: the Fourier modal method (FMM), the finite element method (FEM) and the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. We find that the numerically most efficient method depends on the geometry of the system, as well as on which physical quantities are needed for further analysis. From our study, we will highlight the optimum choice of method for various current nanostructures. With these guidelines, we enable design optimization that would otherwise be impossible with a suboptimal method choice.","PeriodicalId":369769,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absorption modeling with FMM, FEM and FDT\",\"authors\":\"N. Anttu, H. Mäntynen, T. Sadi, A. Matikainen, J. Turunen, H. Lipsanen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NUSOD.2019.8806882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Absorption modeling is at the core of the design process of nanostructured solar cells and photodetectors. We compare the performance of three of the most popular numerical modeling methods: the Fourier modal method (FMM), the finite element method (FEM) and the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. We find that the numerically most efficient method depends on the geometry of the system, as well as on which physical quantities are needed for further analysis. From our study, we will highlight the optimum choice of method for various current nanostructures. With these guidelines, we enable design optimization that would otherwise be impossible with a suboptimal method choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NUSOD.2019.8806882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NUSOD.2019.8806882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吸收建模是纳米结构太阳能电池和光电探测器设计过程的核心。我们比较了三种最流行的数值模拟方法:傅里叶模态法(FMM)、有限元法(FEM)和时域有限差分法(FDTD)的性能。我们发现,数值上最有效的方法取决于系统的几何形状,以及进一步分析需要哪些物理量。从我们的研究中,我们将突出各种当前纳米结构的最佳选择方法。有了这些指导方针,我们就可以实现设计优化,否则使用次优方法选择是不可能实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Absorption modeling with FMM, FEM and FDT
Absorption modeling is at the core of the design process of nanostructured solar cells and photodetectors. We compare the performance of three of the most popular numerical modeling methods: the Fourier modal method (FMM), the finite element method (FEM) and the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. We find that the numerically most efficient method depends on the geometry of the system, as well as on which physical quantities are needed for further analysis. From our study, we will highlight the optimum choice of method for various current nanostructures. With these guidelines, we enable design optimization that would otherwise be impossible with a suboptimal method choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信