竞争性投标会减少医疗保险支出吗?

K. McGeary, Brett Katzman
{"title":"竞争性投标会减少医疗保险支出吗?","authors":"K. McGeary, Brett Katzman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.628721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent measures to reduce Medicare spending include the use of competitive bidding in determining reimbursement prices. Several competitive bidding experiments have recently been conducted by The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to determine reimbursement prices. This paper investigates the use of competitive bidding to specifically set reimbursement prices for Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS). First, the competitive bidding process is examined on a theoretical level. It is shown that the CMS competitive bidding process (auction) is inefficient, may actually lead to price increases, and may cause decreases in the quality of services. Next, data supporting the theoretical predictions is analyzed. Finally, we suggest switching to a Vickrey style auction that does not suffer from the problems of the current design.","PeriodicalId":238933,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Delivery & Financing","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Will Competitive Bidding Decrease Medicare Expenditures?\",\"authors\":\"K. McGeary, Brett Katzman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.628721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent measures to reduce Medicare spending include the use of competitive bidding in determining reimbursement prices. Several competitive bidding experiments have recently been conducted by The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to determine reimbursement prices. This paper investigates the use of competitive bidding to specifically set reimbursement prices for Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS). First, the competitive bidding process is examined on a theoretical level. It is shown that the CMS competitive bidding process (auction) is inefficient, may actually lead to price increases, and may cause decreases in the quality of services. Next, data supporting the theoretical predictions is analyzed. Finally, we suggest switching to a Vickrey style auction that does not suffer from the problems of the current design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":238933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Delivery & Financing\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Delivery & Financing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.628721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Delivery & Financing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.628721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近减少医疗保险支出的措施包括在确定报销价格时使用竞争性投标。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)最近进行了几次竞争性招标实验,以确定报销价格。本文研究了使用竞争性招标来具体设定报销价格的耐用医疗设备,假肢,矫形器和用品(DMEPOS)。首先,从理论层面对竞标过程进行了考察。研究表明,CMS竞争性招标过程(拍卖)效率低下,实际上可能导致价格上涨,并可能导致服务质量下降。接下来,分析支持理论预测的数据。最后,我们建议改用维克里风格的拍卖,这样就不会受到当前设计问题的困扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Will Competitive Bidding Decrease Medicare Expenditures?
Recent measures to reduce Medicare spending include the use of competitive bidding in determining reimbursement prices. Several competitive bidding experiments have recently been conducted by The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to determine reimbursement prices. This paper investigates the use of competitive bidding to specifically set reimbursement prices for Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS). First, the competitive bidding process is examined on a theoretical level. It is shown that the CMS competitive bidding process (auction) is inefficient, may actually lead to price increases, and may cause decreases in the quality of services. Next, data supporting the theoretical predictions is analyzed. Finally, we suggest switching to a Vickrey style auction that does not suffer from the problems of the current design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信