{"title":"电力系统事后平衡分析技术","authors":"R. Yeu, W. Sauer","doi":"10.1109/NAPS.2005.1560548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different methods of calculating the post-contingency equilibrium state of a power system are presented and tested. One method utilizes a full Newton's method, and two utilize a standard commercial power flow program. These three methods are illustrated on two small test systems. The results from these simulations are then compared to a dynamic simulation using numerical integration to an equilibrium state, and conventional contingency analysis using only a standard power flow solution.","PeriodicalId":101495,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005.","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-contingency equilibrium analysis techniques for power systems\",\"authors\":\"R. Yeu, W. Sauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAPS.2005.1560548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different methods of calculating the post-contingency equilibrium state of a power system are presented and tested. One method utilizes a full Newton's method, and two utilize a standard commercial power flow program. These three methods are illustrated on two small test systems. The results from these simulations are then compared to a dynamic simulation using numerical integration to an equilibrium state, and conventional contingency analysis using only a standard power flow solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2005.1560548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2005.1560548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Post-contingency equilibrium analysis techniques for power systems
Different methods of calculating the post-contingency equilibrium state of a power system are presented and tested. One method utilizes a full Newton's method, and two utilize a standard commercial power flow program. These three methods are illustrated on two small test systems. The results from these simulations are then compared to a dynamic simulation using numerical integration to an equilibrium state, and conventional contingency analysis using only a standard power flow solution.