卡拉曼-科尼亚公路路面动力弹性模量不同预测方法的比较

Kemal Armağan, M. Saltan, S. Terzi, N. Kıraç
{"title":"卡拉曼-科尼亚公路路面动力弹性模量不同预测方法的比较","authors":"Kemal Armağan, M. Saltan, S. Terzi, N. Kıraç","doi":"10.53635/JIT.849544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In pavement design and analysis processes among mechanistic-empirical pavement design method, defining the Dynamic Elasticity Modulus(E*) of asphalt layers are very important. In analysis processes, predicting the deteriorations and E* requires some special devices and a lot of time. To simplify this process different prediction models and different approaches have been developed to predict E*. These prediction approaches prepared with huge amount of input data gathered both from construction site and laboratory tests to predict the binder and the volumetric properties of the HMA. In this paper four prediction equations have been applied to predict E* and compared the results with each other. The infrastructure model has chosen as an existing highway section with known HMA material properties. The analyses have done for five different temperatures (10⁰F, 40⁰F, 70⁰F, 100⁰F and 130⁰F) by using two different frequency values (4Hz and 10 Hz). The aim of this research study is doing a comparative assessment of four widely used E* prediction models. Results have shown a large bias between compared E*prediction results due to temperature, frequency, and material properties. Higher Frequency and newest models have shown higher E* values.","PeriodicalId":192007,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovative Transportation","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of dynamic elastisty modulus with different prediction approaches for Karaman – Konya highway pavement\",\"authors\":\"Kemal Armağan, M. Saltan, S. Terzi, N. Kıraç\",\"doi\":\"10.53635/JIT.849544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In pavement design and analysis processes among mechanistic-empirical pavement design method, defining the Dynamic Elasticity Modulus(E*) of asphalt layers are very important. In analysis processes, predicting the deteriorations and E* requires some special devices and a lot of time. To simplify this process different prediction models and different approaches have been developed to predict E*. These prediction approaches prepared with huge amount of input data gathered both from construction site and laboratory tests to predict the binder and the volumetric properties of the HMA. In this paper four prediction equations have been applied to predict E* and compared the results with each other. The infrastructure model has chosen as an existing highway section with known HMA material properties. The analyses have done for five different temperatures (10⁰F, 40⁰F, 70⁰F, 100⁰F and 130⁰F) by using two different frequency values (4Hz and 10 Hz). The aim of this research study is doing a comparative assessment of four widely used E* prediction models. Results have shown a large bias between compared E*prediction results due to temperature, frequency, and material properties. Higher Frequency and newest models have shown higher E* values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovative Transportation\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovative Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53635/JIT.849544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovative Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53635/JIT.849544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在力学-经验路面设计方法的路面设计与分析过程中,沥青层动弹性模量(E*)的确定是非常重要的。在分析过程中,预测劣化和E*需要一些特殊的设备和大量的时间。为了简化这一过程,人们开发了不同的预测模型和不同的方法来预测E*。这些预测方法是根据从施工现场和实验室测试中收集的大量输入数据来预测粘合剂和HMA的体积特性的。本文用四个预测方程对E*进行了预测,并对结果进行了比较。基础设施模型选择了已知HMA材料特性的现有高速公路路段。通过使用两种不同的频率值(4Hz和10hz),对五种不同的温度(10⁰F, 40⁰F, 70⁰F, 100⁰F和130⁰F)进行了分析。本研究的目的是对四种广泛使用的E*预测模型进行比较评估。结果显示,由于温度、频率和材料特性的影响,比较的E*预测结果之间存在很大的偏差。更高频率和最新型号显示出更高的E*值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of dynamic elastisty modulus with different prediction approaches for Karaman – Konya highway pavement
In pavement design and analysis processes among mechanistic-empirical pavement design method, defining the Dynamic Elasticity Modulus(E*) of asphalt layers are very important. In analysis processes, predicting the deteriorations and E* requires some special devices and a lot of time. To simplify this process different prediction models and different approaches have been developed to predict E*. These prediction approaches prepared with huge amount of input data gathered both from construction site and laboratory tests to predict the binder and the volumetric properties of the HMA. In this paper four prediction equations have been applied to predict E* and compared the results with each other. The infrastructure model has chosen as an existing highway section with known HMA material properties. The analyses have done for five different temperatures (10⁰F, 40⁰F, 70⁰F, 100⁰F and 130⁰F) by using two different frequency values (4Hz and 10 Hz). The aim of this research study is doing a comparative assessment of four widely used E* prediction models. Results have shown a large bias between compared E*prediction results due to temperature, frequency, and material properties. Higher Frequency and newest models have shown higher E* values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信