架构及个案研究

P. D. Anderson, M. Dourson, J. Unrine, J. Sheeshka, E. Murkin, Jerry Stober
{"title":"架构及个案研究","authors":"P. D. Anderson, M. Dourson, J. Unrine, J. Sheeshka, E. Murkin, Jerry Stober","doi":"10.1080/08865140215066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an initial Comparative Dietary Risk Framework (referred to as the framework) that combines and compares the potential benefits and potential risks associated with eating contaminated fish. The results of this framework are preliminary, due to the multifactorial analysis involved. Thus, while the framework is a quantitative representation of the net risk (or benefit) associated with eating contaminated fish, it should be used to inform public health officials about the benefits and risk of eating contaminated fish and to investigate and compare various alternative fish protein sources, including perhaps other","PeriodicalId":402874,"journal":{"name":"Comments on Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framework and Case Studies\",\"authors\":\"P. D. Anderson, M. Dourson, J. Unrine, J. Sheeshka, E. Murkin, Jerry Stober\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08865140215066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents an initial Comparative Dietary Risk Framework (referred to as the framework) that combines and compares the potential benefits and potential risks associated with eating contaminated fish. The results of this framework are preliminary, due to the multifactorial analysis involved. Thus, while the framework is a quantitative representation of the net risk (or benefit) associated with eating contaminated fish, it should be used to inform public health officials about the benefits and risk of eating contaminated fish and to investigate and compare various alternative fish protein sources, including perhaps other\",\"PeriodicalId\":402874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comments on Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comments on Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08865140215066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comments on Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08865140215066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

本文提出了一个初步的比较饮食风险框架(简称框架),结合并比较了食用受污染鱼类的潜在利益和潜在风险。由于涉及多因素分析,该框架的结果是初步的。因此,虽然该框架是与食用受污染鱼类相关的净风险(或收益)的定量表示,但它应用于向公共卫生官员通报食用受污染鱼类的收益和风险,并调查和比较各种替代鱼类蛋白质来源,可能包括其他来源
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Framework and Case Studies
This article presents an initial Comparative Dietary Risk Framework (referred to as the framework) that combines and compares the potential benefits and potential risks associated with eating contaminated fish. The results of this framework are preliminary, due to the multifactorial analysis involved. Thus, while the framework is a quantitative representation of the net risk (or benefit) associated with eating contaminated fish, it should be used to inform public health officials about the benefits and risk of eating contaminated fish and to investigate and compare various alternative fish protein sources, including perhaps other
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信