基于国际标准的电子投票系统评估模型:定义与实验验证

M. Prandini, M. Ramilli
{"title":"基于国际标准的电子投票系统评估模型:定义与实验验证","authors":"M. Prandini, M. Ramilli","doi":"10.2979/ESERVICEJ.8.3.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we define a novel scheme for evaluating the compliance of e-voting system to technical standards. The ultimate goal of such a certification path should be guaranteeing that the tested system respects the expected outcome of an election, in terms of correctness of results, identification of voters, anonymity of ballots and other measurable properties. Two main contributions emerge in this field, each with different strengths and weaknesses. The EU Recommendation can be usefully adopted as a high-level guideline towards the intended result, but gives insufficient details for its implementation. The U.S.A. Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) can provide the necessary concreteness to the operative side of the certification path, by means of the many associated field-tested procedures already available, but its parts are unclearly related to the big picture. In this work, we describe our attempt at taking the best of both worlds. We turned the EU Recommendation, a conceptually well-conceived, but not directly applicable document into a real testing and certification manual, by exploiting the experience and guidance provided by the more pragmatic, but less organized U.S.A. VVSG. The result of our work is an applied methodology which must be considered a first step towards an ambitious goal, yet it has been fully field-tested to certify a real e-voting system for official use, providing clear evidences of its usefulness and allowing to highlight directions for its improvement.","PeriodicalId":133558,"journal":{"name":"e-Service Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Model for E-voting Systems Evaluation Based on International Standards: Definition and Experimental Validation\",\"authors\":\"M. Prandini, M. Ramilli\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/ESERVICEJ.8.3.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, we define a novel scheme for evaluating the compliance of e-voting system to technical standards. The ultimate goal of such a certification path should be guaranteeing that the tested system respects the expected outcome of an election, in terms of correctness of results, identification of voters, anonymity of ballots and other measurable properties. Two main contributions emerge in this field, each with different strengths and weaknesses. The EU Recommendation can be usefully adopted as a high-level guideline towards the intended result, but gives insufficient details for its implementation. The U.S.A. Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) can provide the necessary concreteness to the operative side of the certification path, by means of the many associated field-tested procedures already available, but its parts are unclearly related to the big picture. In this work, we describe our attempt at taking the best of both worlds. We turned the EU Recommendation, a conceptually well-conceived, but not directly applicable document into a real testing and certification manual, by exploiting the experience and guidance provided by the more pragmatic, but less organized U.S.A. VVSG. The result of our work is an applied methodology which must be considered a first step towards an ambitious goal, yet it has been fully field-tested to certify a real e-voting system for official use, providing clear evidences of its usefulness and allowing to highlight directions for its improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"e-Service Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"e-Service Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/ESERVICEJ.8.3.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Service Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/ESERVICEJ.8.3.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在这项工作中,我们定义了一个新的方案来评估电子投票系统对技术标准的遵从性。这种认证途径的最终目标应该是保证经过测试的系统尊重选举的预期结果,包括结果的正确性、选民的身份、选票的匿名性和其他可衡量的属性。这一领域出现了两个主要贡献,每个贡献都有不同的优点和缺点。欧盟建议可以作为实现预期结果的高级别指导方针加以采用,但没有提供足够的实施细节。美国自愿投票系统指南(VVSG)可以通过许多相关的现场测试程序为认证路径的操作方面提供必要的具体内容,但其各部分与大局的关系并不明确。在这项工作中,我们描述了我们试图采取两全其美的做法。我们利用美国VVSG提供的经验和指导,将欧盟推荐,一个概念上构思良好,但不能直接适用的文件,变成了一个真正的测试和认证手册。我们的工作成果是一种应用方法,必须被视为实现雄心勃勃的目标的第一步,但它已经经过全面的实地测试,以证明一个真正的官方电子投票系统,提供了明确的证据,证明其有用性,并允许突出其改进方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Model for E-voting Systems Evaluation Based on International Standards: Definition and Experimental Validation
In this work, we define a novel scheme for evaluating the compliance of e-voting system to technical standards. The ultimate goal of such a certification path should be guaranteeing that the tested system respects the expected outcome of an election, in terms of correctness of results, identification of voters, anonymity of ballots and other measurable properties. Two main contributions emerge in this field, each with different strengths and weaknesses. The EU Recommendation can be usefully adopted as a high-level guideline towards the intended result, but gives insufficient details for its implementation. The U.S.A. Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) can provide the necessary concreteness to the operative side of the certification path, by means of the many associated field-tested procedures already available, but its parts are unclearly related to the big picture. In this work, we describe our attempt at taking the best of both worlds. We turned the EU Recommendation, a conceptually well-conceived, but not directly applicable document into a real testing and certification manual, by exploiting the experience and guidance provided by the more pragmatic, but less organized U.S.A. VVSG. The result of our work is an applied methodology which must be considered a first step towards an ambitious goal, yet it has been fully field-tested to certify a real e-voting system for official use, providing clear evidences of its usefulness and allowing to highlight directions for its improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信