小学教师是否有文化:小学教师课程素养研究

Sedef Süer, Mehmet Demirkol
{"title":"小学教师是否有文化:小学教师课程素养研究","authors":"Sedef Süer, Mehmet Demirkol","doi":"10.33200/ijcer.1160273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to determine the curriculum literacy levels of classroom teachers. The study group of this research, which is based on a case study from qualitative research designs, consists of teachers working in primary schools in the 1st term of the 2020-2021 academic year in Diyarbakir. The teachers in the study group were selected by criterion sampling, one of the purposive sampling methods. In the data collection process of the research, semi-structured interview technique was used. In addition, the qualitative data obtained were analyzed with descriptive analysis methods. \nAs a result of this research, it was revealed that the classroom teachers did not directly access the curriculum designed by the MoNE, but indirectly followed the curriculum by downloading the annual plans from the web pages on the internet. In addition, interviews with teachers revealed that teachers could barely demonstrate the philosophy, values and competencies in the curriculum and were unaware of these parts. On the other hand, classroom teachers stated that they focused on basic skills (reading, writing and arithmetic), life skills (self-confidence, entrepreneurship, self-regulation, problem solving) and values education (love, respect, honesty, sharing, responsibility) in success. It is seen that while teachers mostly talk about the acquisitions related to basic skills, life skills and values education in the curriculum, they refer less to the acquisitions related to mathematics and engineering skills, which are widely used and vital in today's world. This result is teachers' 21st century. It has been shown that they care about the inclusion of skills, life skills and values education in the curriculum and they try to achieve the goals for these skills by the students.","PeriodicalId":171092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research","volume":"24 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Primary Teachers Literate or Not: A study on Curriculum Literacy of Primary Teachers\",\"authors\":\"Sedef Süer, Mehmet Demirkol\",\"doi\":\"10.33200/ijcer.1160273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this research is to determine the curriculum literacy levels of classroom teachers. The study group of this research, which is based on a case study from qualitative research designs, consists of teachers working in primary schools in the 1st term of the 2020-2021 academic year in Diyarbakir. The teachers in the study group were selected by criterion sampling, one of the purposive sampling methods. In the data collection process of the research, semi-structured interview technique was used. In addition, the qualitative data obtained were analyzed with descriptive analysis methods. \\nAs a result of this research, it was revealed that the classroom teachers did not directly access the curriculum designed by the MoNE, but indirectly followed the curriculum by downloading the annual plans from the web pages on the internet. In addition, interviews with teachers revealed that teachers could barely demonstrate the philosophy, values and competencies in the curriculum and were unaware of these parts. On the other hand, classroom teachers stated that they focused on basic skills (reading, writing and arithmetic), life skills (self-confidence, entrepreneurship, self-regulation, problem solving) and values education (love, respect, honesty, sharing, responsibility) in success. It is seen that while teachers mostly talk about the acquisitions related to basic skills, life skills and values education in the curriculum, they refer less to the acquisitions related to mathematics and engineering skills, which are widely used and vital in today's world. This result is teachers' 21st century. It has been shown that they care about the inclusion of skills, life skills and values education in the curriculum and they try to achieve the goals for these skills by the students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"24 10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1160273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1160273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定课堂教师的课程素养水平。本研究的研究小组基于定性研究设计的案例研究,由迪亚巴克尔2020-2021学年第一学期在小学工作的教师组成。实验组教师采用标准抽样,即目的抽样方法之一。在本研究的数据收集过程中,采用了半结构化访谈技术。此外,对获得的定性数据采用描述性分析方法进行分析。研究结果显示,课堂教师并不直接使用教育部设计的课程,而是通过从互联网上的网页下载年度计划来间接遵循课程。此外,对教师的访谈显示,教师几乎无法展示课程中的哲学、价值观和能力,并且没有意识到这些部分。另一方面,课堂教师表示,他们关注的是成功的基本技能(阅读、写作和算术)、生活技能(自信、创业、自律、解决问题)和价值观教育(爱、尊重、诚实、分享、责任)。可以看出,虽然教师在课程中主要谈论与基本技能、生活技能和价值观教育相关的习得,但他们较少提及与数学和工程技能相关的习得,这些技能在当今世界被广泛使用且至关重要。这个结果就是21世纪的教师。这表明,他们关心的包括技能,生活技能和价值观教育在课程中,他们试图实现这些技能的学生的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Primary Teachers Literate or Not: A study on Curriculum Literacy of Primary Teachers
The aim of this research is to determine the curriculum literacy levels of classroom teachers. The study group of this research, which is based on a case study from qualitative research designs, consists of teachers working in primary schools in the 1st term of the 2020-2021 academic year in Diyarbakir. The teachers in the study group were selected by criterion sampling, one of the purposive sampling methods. In the data collection process of the research, semi-structured interview technique was used. In addition, the qualitative data obtained were analyzed with descriptive analysis methods. As a result of this research, it was revealed that the classroom teachers did not directly access the curriculum designed by the MoNE, but indirectly followed the curriculum by downloading the annual plans from the web pages on the internet. In addition, interviews with teachers revealed that teachers could barely demonstrate the philosophy, values and competencies in the curriculum and were unaware of these parts. On the other hand, classroom teachers stated that they focused on basic skills (reading, writing and arithmetic), life skills (self-confidence, entrepreneurship, self-regulation, problem solving) and values education (love, respect, honesty, sharing, responsibility) in success. It is seen that while teachers mostly talk about the acquisitions related to basic skills, life skills and values education in the curriculum, they refer less to the acquisitions related to mathematics and engineering skills, which are widely used and vital in today's world. This result is teachers' 21st century. It has been shown that they care about the inclusion of skills, life skills and values education in the curriculum and they try to achieve the goals for these skills by the students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信