尼日利亚不道德的营销研究实践:营销报告中的操纵

Okeke Adaora Florence, Kalu Alexanda Ogbonna Udu
{"title":"尼日利亚不道德的营销研究实践:营销报告中的操纵","authors":"Okeke Adaora Florence, Kalu Alexanda Ogbonna Udu","doi":"10.12816/0028307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Key business decisions are taken based on the recommendations from research report, but the years, information drawn from such data warehouses have resulted to marketing myopia and wrong marketing investment and poor returns thereof. The problem in this study stems from the fact that the research system of a developing nation experiences high level of unethical practices which hampers the integrity of their research results. Most research report application in Nigeria transforms to inaccuracy in business decision making and marketing error, and it is against this backdrop that the need to study the implications of manipulated report arose. The objective of the study was to critically examine the implications of manipulated research report on the business operations effectiveness and efficiency. Marketing research ethics simply entails the right conduct in the marketing research process. It was ascertained that unethical research practice which results to manipulated research report includes, misrepresentation of research findings, fabrication or plagiarism and falsification of data. It was ascertained that this unethical behaviors damps innovation, leads to poor returns on marketing investment (ROMI), marketing myopia, hampers accuracy, and lot more. Researchers who manipulate their research report in ways that deceive others are violating both the basic values and widely accepted professional standards of science, failure to fulfill predetermined obligations. They mislead their colleagues and potentially impede progress in their field or research. They undermine their own authority and trustworthiness as researchers. It recommended that research group instructors should educate their students and research associates about the ethical responsibilities of authors of scientific publications and to insure that, when they are given the responsibility for submitting a paper, they are fully aware of the potential consequences, to themselves and to their coauthors, of violations in these ethical guidelines.","PeriodicalId":124555,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Research in Economics and Management","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unethical Marketing Research Practices in Nigeria : Manipulations in Marketing Reports\",\"authors\":\"Okeke Adaora Florence, Kalu Alexanda Ogbonna Udu\",\"doi\":\"10.12816/0028307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Key business decisions are taken based on the recommendations from research report, but the years, information drawn from such data warehouses have resulted to marketing myopia and wrong marketing investment and poor returns thereof. The problem in this study stems from the fact that the research system of a developing nation experiences high level of unethical practices which hampers the integrity of their research results. Most research report application in Nigeria transforms to inaccuracy in business decision making and marketing error, and it is against this backdrop that the need to study the implications of manipulated report arose. The objective of the study was to critically examine the implications of manipulated research report on the business operations effectiveness and efficiency. Marketing research ethics simply entails the right conduct in the marketing research process. It was ascertained that unethical research practice which results to manipulated research report includes, misrepresentation of research findings, fabrication or plagiarism and falsification of data. It was ascertained that this unethical behaviors damps innovation, leads to poor returns on marketing investment (ROMI), marketing myopia, hampers accuracy, and lot more. Researchers who manipulate their research report in ways that deceive others are violating both the basic values and widely accepted professional standards of science, failure to fulfill predetermined obligations. They mislead their colleagues and potentially impede progress in their field or research. They undermine their own authority and trustworthiness as researchers. It recommended that research group instructors should educate their students and research associates about the ethical responsibilities of authors of scientific publications and to insure that, when they are given the responsibility for submitting a paper, they are fully aware of the potential consequences, to themselves and to their coauthors, of violations in these ethical guidelines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Journal of Research in Economics and Management\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Journal of Research in Economics and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12816/0028307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Research in Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12816/0028307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关键的商业决策是根据研究报告的建议做出的,但多年来,从这些数据仓库中提取的信息导致了营销短视和错误的营销投资和回报不佳。本研究的问题源于一个发展中国家的研究系统经历了高水平的不道德行为,这阻碍了他们的研究结果的完整性。在尼日利亚,大多数研究报告的应用转变为商业决策和营销错误的不准确性,正是在这种背景下,需要研究操纵报告的影响。本研究的目的是批判性地检视被操纵的研究报告对企业运作效能和效率的影响。营销研究伦理仅仅是指在营销研究过程中的正确行为。经确定,导致被操纵的研究报告的不道德的研究实践包括,对研究结果的歪曲,捏造或剽窃和伪造数据。事实证明,这种不道德的行为会阻碍创新,导致营销投资回报率低(ROMI),营销短视,妨碍准确性等等。以欺骗他人的方式操纵研究报告的研究人员违反了基本价值观和广泛接受的科学专业标准,未能履行预定的义务。他们误导了他们的同事,并可能阻碍他们所在领域或研究的进展。他们破坏了自己作为研究人员的权威和可信度。它建议,研究小组的导师应该教育他们的学生和研究人员关于科学出版物作者的伦理责任,并确保当他们被赋予提交论文的责任时,他们充分意识到违反这些伦理准则对他们自己和他们的共同作者的潜在后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unethical Marketing Research Practices in Nigeria : Manipulations in Marketing Reports
Key business decisions are taken based on the recommendations from research report, but the years, information drawn from such data warehouses have resulted to marketing myopia and wrong marketing investment and poor returns thereof. The problem in this study stems from the fact that the research system of a developing nation experiences high level of unethical practices which hampers the integrity of their research results. Most research report application in Nigeria transforms to inaccuracy in business decision making and marketing error, and it is against this backdrop that the need to study the implications of manipulated report arose. The objective of the study was to critically examine the implications of manipulated research report on the business operations effectiveness and efficiency. Marketing research ethics simply entails the right conduct in the marketing research process. It was ascertained that unethical research practice which results to manipulated research report includes, misrepresentation of research findings, fabrication or plagiarism and falsification of data. It was ascertained that this unethical behaviors damps innovation, leads to poor returns on marketing investment (ROMI), marketing myopia, hampers accuracy, and lot more. Researchers who manipulate their research report in ways that deceive others are violating both the basic values and widely accepted professional standards of science, failure to fulfill predetermined obligations. They mislead their colleagues and potentially impede progress in their field or research. They undermine their own authority and trustworthiness as researchers. It recommended that research group instructors should educate their students and research associates about the ethical responsibilities of authors of scientific publications and to insure that, when they are given the responsibility for submitting a paper, they are fully aware of the potential consequences, to themselves and to their coauthors, of violations in these ethical guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信