去市场化,去监管化,去合法化?通过《健康与保健法案》消除英国国民保健服务体系的竞争

M. Guy
{"title":"去市场化,去监管化,去合法化?通过《健康与保健法案》消除英国国民保健服务体系的竞争","authors":"M. Guy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3915776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the ambitious aims of the Health and Care Bill is the removal of competition from the English NHS, thus cementing policy shifts towards integration. Controversies and misunderstandings surrounding the competition provisions of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (HSCA 2012) suggest that new legislation may be welcomed without thorough scrutiny. Some controversy lies in the ‘juridification’ of public policy identified by Davies following the HSCA 2012 reforms. The prospect of new legislation suggests that analysis of ‘dejuridification’ could offer insights which may otherwise be overlooked. Certainly the Health and Care Bill takes a different approach to other attempts to repeal the HSCA 2012, the National Health Service (Amended Duties and Powers) Bill and the NHS Bill. The latter might be characterised as ‘demarketisation’, in contrast to the ‘deregulation’ implicit in the 2019 NHS Long Term Plan proposals which underpin the Health and Care Bill. The anticompetitive agreements prohibition and merger control are two aspects of the HSCA 2012 competition policy which can be perceived as capable of inhibiting the current move towards integration. This paper uses these provisions as lenses to evaluate how ‘juridification’ developed with the HSCA 2012 and subsequently, and to examine how ‘dejuridification’ may take effect. This offers insights – and a need for caution – as the Health and Care Bill progresses through the UK parliament in the 2021/2022 parliamentary session.","PeriodicalId":210610,"journal":{"name":"Public Sector Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demarketisation, Deregulation, Dejuridification? Removing competition from the English NHS with the Health and Care Bill\",\"authors\":\"M. Guy\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3915776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the ambitious aims of the Health and Care Bill is the removal of competition from the English NHS, thus cementing policy shifts towards integration. Controversies and misunderstandings surrounding the competition provisions of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (HSCA 2012) suggest that new legislation may be welcomed without thorough scrutiny. Some controversy lies in the ‘juridification’ of public policy identified by Davies following the HSCA 2012 reforms. The prospect of new legislation suggests that analysis of ‘dejuridification’ could offer insights which may otherwise be overlooked. Certainly the Health and Care Bill takes a different approach to other attempts to repeal the HSCA 2012, the National Health Service (Amended Duties and Powers) Bill and the NHS Bill. The latter might be characterised as ‘demarketisation’, in contrast to the ‘deregulation’ implicit in the 2019 NHS Long Term Plan proposals which underpin the Health and Care Bill. The anticompetitive agreements prohibition and merger control are two aspects of the HSCA 2012 competition policy which can be perceived as capable of inhibiting the current move towards integration. This paper uses these provisions as lenses to evaluate how ‘juridification’ developed with the HSCA 2012 and subsequently, and to examine how ‘dejuridification’ may take effect. This offers insights – and a need for caution – as the Health and Care Bill progresses through the UK parliament in the 2021/2022 parliamentary session.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Sector Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Sector Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3915776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Sector Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3915776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《健康与保健法案》雄心勃勃的目标之一是消除英国国民保健服务体系的竞争,从而巩固政策向一体化的转变。围绕《2012年卫生和社会保健法》(HSCA 2012)竞争条款的争议和误解表明,新立法可能在没有彻底审查的情况下受到欢迎。一些争议在于戴维斯在2012年HSCA改革后确定的公共政策的“正当性”。新立法的前景表明,对“去合法化”的分析可能会提供一些可能被忽视的见解。当然,《卫生和保健法案》采取了一种不同的方法来废除《2012年卫生和保健法案》、《国家卫生服务(职责和权力修正)法案》和《国民保健服务法案》。后者可能被描述为“去市场化”,与2019年NHS长期计划提案中隐含的“去监管化”形成鲜明对比,后者是《卫生和保健法案》的基础。反竞争协议禁止和合并控制是HSCA 2012竞争政策的两个方面,可以被视为能够抑制当前走向整合的举措。本文使用这些条款作为透镜来评估“合法化”如何随着HSCA 2012及其后续发展,并研究“去合法化”如何生效。随着英国议会在2021/2022年议会会议上通过《卫生与保健法案》,这为我们提供了一些见解——也需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demarketisation, Deregulation, Dejuridification? Removing competition from the English NHS with the Health and Care Bill
Among the ambitious aims of the Health and Care Bill is the removal of competition from the English NHS, thus cementing policy shifts towards integration. Controversies and misunderstandings surrounding the competition provisions of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (HSCA 2012) suggest that new legislation may be welcomed without thorough scrutiny. Some controversy lies in the ‘juridification’ of public policy identified by Davies following the HSCA 2012 reforms. The prospect of new legislation suggests that analysis of ‘dejuridification’ could offer insights which may otherwise be overlooked. Certainly the Health and Care Bill takes a different approach to other attempts to repeal the HSCA 2012, the National Health Service (Amended Duties and Powers) Bill and the NHS Bill. The latter might be characterised as ‘demarketisation’, in contrast to the ‘deregulation’ implicit in the 2019 NHS Long Term Plan proposals which underpin the Health and Care Bill. The anticompetitive agreements prohibition and merger control are two aspects of the HSCA 2012 competition policy which can be perceived as capable of inhibiting the current move towards integration. This paper uses these provisions as lenses to evaluate how ‘juridification’ developed with the HSCA 2012 and subsequently, and to examine how ‘dejuridification’ may take effect. This offers insights – and a need for caution – as the Health and Care Bill progresses through the UK parliament in the 2021/2022 parliamentary session.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信