归类不干涉

J. Jacob
{"title":"归类不干涉","authors":"J. Jacob","doi":"10.1109/CSFW.1990.128184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Noninterference (see J.A. Goguen and J. Meseguer, 1982) is given an abstract definition in category-theoretic terms. Unwinding theorems are investigated from this starting point. The theorems assume that commands form a monoid. Thus the results do not apply to systems where some sequences of commands are syntactically invalid. The extension to categories would generalize the results to languages where not every string is a syntactically valid program. It is concluded that category theory is a powerful tool for reasoning about noninterference.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":185508,"journal":{"name":"[1990] Proceedings. The Computer Security Foundations Workshop III","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Categorising non-interference\",\"authors\":\"J. Jacob\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSFW.1990.128184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Noninterference (see J.A. Goguen and J. Meseguer, 1982) is given an abstract definition in category-theoretic terms. Unwinding theorems are investigated from this starting point. The theorems assume that commands form a monoid. Thus the results do not apply to systems where some sequences of commands are syntactically invalid. The extension to categories would generalize the results to languages where not every string is a syntactically valid program. It is concluded that category theory is a powerful tool for reasoning about noninterference.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":185508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1990] Proceedings. The Computer Security Foundations Workshop III\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1990] Proceedings. The Computer Security Foundations Workshop III\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.1990.128184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1990] Proceedings. The Computer Security Foundations Workshop III","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.1990.128184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

不干涉(见J. a . Goguen和J. Meseguer, 1982)在范畴论术语中给出了一个抽象的定义。展开定理从这个起点进行研究。定理假设命令形成一个单群。因此,结果不适用于某些命令序列在语法上无效的系统。对categories的扩展将把结果推广到并非每个字符串都是语法有效程序的语言。结论是范畴论是推理非干涉性的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Categorising non-interference
Noninterference (see J.A. Goguen and J. Meseguer, 1982) is given an abstract definition in category-theoretic terms. Unwinding theorems are investigated from this starting point. The theorems assume that commands form a monoid. Thus the results do not apply to systems where some sequences of commands are syntactically invalid. The extension to categories would generalize the results to languages where not every string is a syntactically valid program. It is concluded that category theory is a powerful tool for reasoning about noninterference.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信