卡齐纳联邦教学医院子宫破裂:五年回顾

Lawal Mohammed, Oyetunji Lukeman Olajide, Rasheed Fatima Abubakar, Nsima Etukudo David, Kundil Zainab Buba
{"title":"卡齐纳联邦教学医院子宫破裂:五年回顾","authors":"Lawal Mohammed, Oyetunji Lukeman Olajide, Rasheed Fatima Abubakar, Nsima Etukudo David, Kundil Zainab Buba","doi":"10.33425/2833-0390.1013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Uterine rupture, despite being one of the most devastating obstetric complication associated with significant maternal and perinatal morbidities and mortality, is still prevalent in developing countries. Objectives: To determine the prevalence, aetiologic risk and other contributing factors, complications as well as outcome of Obstetric Uterine rupture at Federal Teaching Hospital, Katsina. Study Design: A Five year retrospective study that reviewed uterine rupture in Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of Federal Teaching Hospital, Katsina from 1st January 2010 to December 31st 2014. Results: There were 42 uterine ruptures out of 9995 deliveries, with an incidence of 4.2 per 1000 deliveries. The mean age of the patients was 31yrs± 0.9. The highest incidence was among unbooked patients (85%). The diagnosis was made pre-operatively in 88.1% of the cases. Major risk factors were prolonged obstructed labour (26.2%), previous caesarean section scar (19%) and Oxytocin infusion in unscarred (14.3%) and scarred Uteri (11.9%) as well as use of Misoprostol (11.9%). Majority of the ruptures occurred anteriorly (52.4%) while scar dehiscence accounted for 23.8% of cases. Repair with bilateral tubal ligation was the most frequent mode of treatment (47.6%), while hysterectomy was done for patients with extensive ruptures (34.3%). The commonest complication was postoperative Anaemia (38.1%). There were two maternal deaths, with a case fatality rate of 4.8%, while the perinatal mortality was 78.6%. Conclusion: Uterine rupture is still a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidities and mortality in our setting. Antenatal care with skilled facility-based deliveries will reduce its incidence and associated complications.","PeriodicalId":330636,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Oncology","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uterine Rupture at Federal Teaching Hospital, Katsina: A Five Year Review\",\"authors\":\"Lawal Mohammed, Oyetunji Lukeman Olajide, Rasheed Fatima Abubakar, Nsima Etukudo David, Kundil Zainab Buba\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2833-0390.1013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Uterine rupture, despite being one of the most devastating obstetric complication associated with significant maternal and perinatal morbidities and mortality, is still prevalent in developing countries. Objectives: To determine the prevalence, aetiologic risk and other contributing factors, complications as well as outcome of Obstetric Uterine rupture at Federal Teaching Hospital, Katsina. Study Design: A Five year retrospective study that reviewed uterine rupture in Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of Federal Teaching Hospital, Katsina from 1st January 2010 to December 31st 2014. Results: There were 42 uterine ruptures out of 9995 deliveries, with an incidence of 4.2 per 1000 deliveries. The mean age of the patients was 31yrs± 0.9. The highest incidence was among unbooked patients (85%). The diagnosis was made pre-operatively in 88.1% of the cases. Major risk factors were prolonged obstructed labour (26.2%), previous caesarean section scar (19%) and Oxytocin infusion in unscarred (14.3%) and scarred Uteri (11.9%) as well as use of Misoprostol (11.9%). Majority of the ruptures occurred anteriorly (52.4%) while scar dehiscence accounted for 23.8% of cases. Repair with bilateral tubal ligation was the most frequent mode of treatment (47.6%), while hysterectomy was done for patients with extensive ruptures (34.3%). The commonest complication was postoperative Anaemia (38.1%). There were two maternal deaths, with a case fatality rate of 4.8%, while the perinatal mortality was 78.6%. Conclusion: Uterine rupture is still a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidities and mortality in our setting. Antenatal care with skilled facility-based deliveries will reduce its incidence and associated complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2833-0390.1013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2833-0390.1013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:子宫破裂尽管是最具破坏性的产科并发症之一,与显著的孕产妇和围产期发病率和死亡率相关,但在发展中国家仍然普遍存在。目的:了解卡齐纳联邦教学医院产科子宫破裂的发生率、病因危险因素及其他影响因素、并发症及结局。研究设计:一项为期五年的回顾性研究,回顾了2010年1月1日至2014年12月31日卡齐纳联邦教学医院妇产科子宫破裂病例。结果:9995例分娩中子宫破裂42例,发生率为4.2 / 1000。患者平均年龄31岁±0.9岁。发病率最高的是未预约的患者(85%)。术前诊断率为88.1%。主要危险因素为长时间难产(26.2%)、既往剖宫产疤痕(19%)、无疤痕子宫输注催产素(14.3%)和疤痕子宫输注催产素(11.9%)以及使用米索前列醇(11.9%)。瘢痕破裂占23.8%,前方破裂占52.4%。双侧输卵管结扎修复是最常见的治疗方式(47.6%),而子宫切除术用于广泛破裂的患者(34.3%)。最常见的并发症是术后贫血(38.1%)。产妇死亡2例,病死率为4.8%,围产期死亡率为78.6%。结论:子宫破裂仍是本院孕产妇及围产期发病和死亡的主要原因。在熟练的设施分娩的产前保健将减少其发病率和相关并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uterine Rupture at Federal Teaching Hospital, Katsina: A Five Year Review
Background: Uterine rupture, despite being one of the most devastating obstetric complication associated with significant maternal and perinatal morbidities and mortality, is still prevalent in developing countries. Objectives: To determine the prevalence, aetiologic risk and other contributing factors, complications as well as outcome of Obstetric Uterine rupture at Federal Teaching Hospital, Katsina. Study Design: A Five year retrospective study that reviewed uterine rupture in Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of Federal Teaching Hospital, Katsina from 1st January 2010 to December 31st 2014. Results: There were 42 uterine ruptures out of 9995 deliveries, with an incidence of 4.2 per 1000 deliveries. The mean age of the patients was 31yrs± 0.9. The highest incidence was among unbooked patients (85%). The diagnosis was made pre-operatively in 88.1% of the cases. Major risk factors were prolonged obstructed labour (26.2%), previous caesarean section scar (19%) and Oxytocin infusion in unscarred (14.3%) and scarred Uteri (11.9%) as well as use of Misoprostol (11.9%). Majority of the ruptures occurred anteriorly (52.4%) while scar dehiscence accounted for 23.8% of cases. Repair with bilateral tubal ligation was the most frequent mode of treatment (47.6%), while hysterectomy was done for patients with extensive ruptures (34.3%). The commonest complication was postoperative Anaemia (38.1%). There were two maternal deaths, with a case fatality rate of 4.8%, while the perinatal mortality was 78.6%. Conclusion: Uterine rupture is still a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidities and mortality in our setting. Antenatal care with skilled facility-based deliveries will reduce its incidence and associated complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信