历史趋势、设备年龄和维护对断路器故障率的影响

C. C. Thompson, C. I. Barriga
{"title":"历史趋势、设备年龄和维护对断路器故障率的影响","authors":"C. C. Thompson, C. I. Barriga","doi":"10.1109/ICPS.2019.8733373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Circuit breakers are among the more ubiquitous devices found in all types of facilities. Even small buildings can have hundreds of them, quietly and vigilantly protecting personnel, equipment, and critical functions. But circuit breakers fail - and how they fail matters. This paper shows that failure rates have varied historically, that failure rates change as a function of equipment age, and that failure rates respond to preventative maintenance activity, often counterintuitively. These results are much more transient than previously understood, often varying by an order of magnitude or more. Our current assumptions about maintenance and failure may very well do harm to our facility electrical systems. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers collected and analyzed a database of equipment records over several decades. This paper includes several thousand unit-years of circuit breaker information, giving specific performance detail under more clearly defined circumstances. Point estimates provide mean device performance statistics, while figures show unpublished details of circuit breaker failure that provide more information to facility managers and design engineers.","PeriodicalId":160476,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/IAS 55th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Historical Trends, Equipment Age, and Maintenance on Circuit Breaker Failure Rates\",\"authors\":\"C. C. Thompson, C. I. Barriga\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPS.2019.8733373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Circuit breakers are among the more ubiquitous devices found in all types of facilities. Even small buildings can have hundreds of them, quietly and vigilantly protecting personnel, equipment, and critical functions. But circuit breakers fail - and how they fail matters. This paper shows that failure rates have varied historically, that failure rates change as a function of equipment age, and that failure rates respond to preventative maintenance activity, often counterintuitively. These results are much more transient than previously understood, often varying by an order of magnitude or more. Our current assumptions about maintenance and failure may very well do harm to our facility electrical systems. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers collected and analyzed a database of equipment records over several decades. This paper includes several thousand unit-years of circuit breaker information, giving specific performance detail under more clearly defined circumstances. Point estimates provide mean device performance statistics, while figures show unpublished details of circuit breaker failure that provide more information to facility managers and design engineers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":160476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE/IAS 55th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE/IAS 55th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS.2019.8733373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/IAS 55th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS.2019.8733373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

断路器是各种设施中普遍存在的设备之一。即使是很小的建筑物也可能有数百个,安静而警惕地保护人员、设备和关键功能。但是断路器失灵了——它们如何失灵很重要。本文表明,故障率在历史上是不同的,故障率随着设备年龄的变化而变化,故障率对预防性维护活动做出反应,这通常与直觉相反。这些结果比以前理解的要短暂得多,通常变化一个数量级或更多。我们目前对维护和故障的假设很可能对我们的设施电气系统造成伤害。美国陆军工程兵团收集并分析了几十年来设备记录的数据库。本文包含了数千个单位年的断路器信息,给出了更明确定义的情况下的具体性能细节。点估计提供了平均设备性能统计数据,而数字显示了未公布的断路器故障细节,为设施管理人员和设计工程师提供了更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Historical Trends, Equipment Age, and Maintenance on Circuit Breaker Failure Rates
Circuit breakers are among the more ubiquitous devices found in all types of facilities. Even small buildings can have hundreds of them, quietly and vigilantly protecting personnel, equipment, and critical functions. But circuit breakers fail - and how they fail matters. This paper shows that failure rates have varied historically, that failure rates change as a function of equipment age, and that failure rates respond to preventative maintenance activity, often counterintuitively. These results are much more transient than previously understood, often varying by an order of magnitude or more. Our current assumptions about maintenance and failure may very well do harm to our facility electrical systems. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers collected and analyzed a database of equipment records over several decades. This paper includes several thousand unit-years of circuit breaker information, giving specific performance detail under more clearly defined circumstances. Point estimates provide mean device performance statistics, while figures show unpublished details of circuit breaker failure that provide more information to facility managers and design engineers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信