比较音乐家和非音乐家对音乐和视觉的期望

Kat R. Agres, Ting Yuan Tay, M. Pearce
{"title":"比较音乐家和非音乐家对音乐和视觉的期望","authors":"Kat R. Agres, Ting Yuan Tay, M. Pearce","doi":"10.1145/3561212.3561251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of expectation in music has been of research interest for decades. Expectation mechanisms have also received considerable attention in vision, due in part to the widespread interest in predictive coding. Past research has uncovered different types of expectations that may be formed when exposed to a sequential stimulus, such as schematic expectation (based on general knowledge) and dynamic expectation (based on properties within the current stimulus). Yet to our knowledge, a direct comparison of the relative contribution of these types of expectation has not been performed within the same subjects through careful manipulation of stimuli, nor has this comparison been made across the musical and visual domains. This listener study aims to uncover the relative influence of dynamic and schematic expectations in musical and visual stimuli, and investigate the role of expertise in forming expectations by testing both musicians and non-musicians. Our findings suggest that musicians are indeed more sensitive than non-musicians to the dynamic and schematic properties of musical stimuli, and they generally produce a wider range of expectedness ratings than non-musicians. Interestingly, musicians also interpret schematic information in the visual condition differently than non-musicians, suggesting that musical training may have influenced their expectation mechanisms more generally.","PeriodicalId":379319,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Musicians and Non-musicians’ Expectations in Music and Vision\",\"authors\":\"Kat R. Agres, Ting Yuan Tay, M. Pearce\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3561212.3561251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The role of expectation in music has been of research interest for decades. Expectation mechanisms have also received considerable attention in vision, due in part to the widespread interest in predictive coding. Past research has uncovered different types of expectations that may be formed when exposed to a sequential stimulus, such as schematic expectation (based on general knowledge) and dynamic expectation (based on properties within the current stimulus). Yet to our knowledge, a direct comparison of the relative contribution of these types of expectation has not been performed within the same subjects through careful manipulation of stimuli, nor has this comparison been made across the musical and visual domains. This listener study aims to uncover the relative influence of dynamic and schematic expectations in musical and visual stimuli, and investigate the role of expertise in forming expectations by testing both musicians and non-musicians. Our findings suggest that musicians are indeed more sensitive than non-musicians to the dynamic and schematic properties of musical stimuli, and they generally produce a wider range of expectedness ratings than non-musicians. Interestingly, musicians also interpret schematic information in the visual condition differently than non-musicians, suggesting that musical training may have influenced their expectation mechanisms more generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3561212.3561251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3561212.3561251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,期望在音乐中的作用一直是人们研究的热点。期望机制在视觉领域也受到了相当大的关注,部分原因是对预测编码的广泛兴趣。过去的研究已经揭示了当暴露于连续刺激时可能形成的不同类型的期望,例如图式期望(基于一般知识)和动态期望(基于当前刺激的属性)。然而,据我们所知,这些类型的期望的相对贡献的直接比较尚未在同一受试者中通过仔细操纵刺激进行过,也没有在音乐和视觉领域进行过这种比较。本研究旨在揭示动态期望和图式期望在音乐和视觉刺激中的相对影响,并通过测试音乐家和非音乐家来探讨专业知识在形成期望中的作用。我们的研究结果表明,音乐家确实比非音乐家对音乐刺激的动态和图式特性更敏感,他们通常比非音乐家产生更大范围的期望评级。有趣的是,音乐家在视觉条件下对图式信息的解释也不同于非音乐家,这表明音乐训练可能更普遍地影响了他们的期望机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Musicians and Non-musicians’ Expectations in Music and Vision
The role of expectation in music has been of research interest for decades. Expectation mechanisms have also received considerable attention in vision, due in part to the widespread interest in predictive coding. Past research has uncovered different types of expectations that may be formed when exposed to a sequential stimulus, such as schematic expectation (based on general knowledge) and dynamic expectation (based on properties within the current stimulus). Yet to our knowledge, a direct comparison of the relative contribution of these types of expectation has not been performed within the same subjects through careful manipulation of stimuli, nor has this comparison been made across the musical and visual domains. This listener study aims to uncover the relative influence of dynamic and schematic expectations in musical and visual stimuli, and investigate the role of expertise in forming expectations by testing both musicians and non-musicians. Our findings suggest that musicians are indeed more sensitive than non-musicians to the dynamic and schematic properties of musical stimuli, and they generally produce a wider range of expectedness ratings than non-musicians. Interestingly, musicians also interpret schematic information in the visual condition differently than non-musicians, suggesting that musical training may have influenced their expectation mechanisms more generally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信