基于智能体的电力市场博弈分析方法

Andrew Fielder
{"title":"基于智能体的电力市场博弈分析方法","authors":"Andrew Fielder","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2011.5952991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Game Theory is a long standing method of analysing the way in which participants interact within a market space, recently agent based approaches have been utilised to understand even more about these interactions. This agent based approach can be utilised to understand very complex market designs, such as those for an electricity market, with there being potential room for identifying potential problems with market power. By looking at the way in which a set of intelligent agents form optimal bids in a constrained electricity market, it is possible to identify where potential weaknesses are in the market design. Agents simulate the market repeatedly, aiming to find the Nash-Equilibrium point for the the market at the given time step. By predicting other agents reactionary moves, they can identify the best course of action, with this information it is possible to identify the contributing factors that have caused the agent's choice of action. As such, this work sets out to identify where and when an electricity market can be forced into undesirable situations, only as a result of optimised bidding and existing market constraints.","PeriodicalId":143375,"journal":{"name":"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An agent based game theory approach to analysing constrained electricity markets\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Fielder\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2011.5952991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Game Theory is a long standing method of analysing the way in which participants interact within a market space, recently agent based approaches have been utilised to understand even more about these interactions. This agent based approach can be utilised to understand very complex market designs, such as those for an electricity market, with there being potential room for identifying potential problems with market power. By looking at the way in which a set of intelligent agents form optimal bids in a constrained electricity market, it is possible to identify where potential weaknesses are in the market design. Agents simulate the market repeatedly, aiming to find the Nash-Equilibrium point for the the market at the given time step. By predicting other agents reactionary moves, they can identify the best course of action, with this information it is possible to identify the contributing factors that have caused the agent's choice of action. As such, this work sets out to identify where and when an electricity market can be forced into undesirable situations, only as a result of optimised bidding and existing market constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2011.5952991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2011.5952991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

博弈论是一种长期存在的分析市场空间中参与者互动方式的方法,最近基于代理的方法被用于更多地理解这些互动。这种基于代理的方法可以用来理解非常复杂的市场设计,比如电力市场,因为市场力量存在潜在的问题。通过观察一组智能代理在受限的电力市场中形成最优出价的方式,可以确定市场设计中的潜在弱点在哪里。智能体反复模拟市场,目的是在给定的时间步长找到市场的纳什平衡点。通过预测其他代理的反动行动,他们可以确定最佳的行动方案,有了这些信息,就有可能确定导致代理选择行动的因素。因此,这项工作旨在确定电力市场在何时何地会被迫进入不受欢迎的情况,而这仅仅是优化竞标和现有市场约束的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An agent based game theory approach to analysing constrained electricity markets
Game Theory is a long standing method of analysing the way in which participants interact within a market space, recently agent based approaches have been utilised to understand even more about these interactions. This agent based approach can be utilised to understand very complex market designs, such as those for an electricity market, with there being potential room for identifying potential problems with market power. By looking at the way in which a set of intelligent agents form optimal bids in a constrained electricity market, it is possible to identify where potential weaknesses are in the market design. Agents simulate the market repeatedly, aiming to find the Nash-Equilibrium point for the the market at the given time step. By predicting other agents reactionary moves, they can identify the best course of action, with this information it is possible to identify the contributing factors that have caused the agent's choice of action. As such, this work sets out to identify where and when an electricity market can be forced into undesirable situations, only as a result of optimised bidding and existing market constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信