经椎体后外侧上部单侧穿刺治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折

Deng-Jing Chuang, H. Shengli, X. Wei, Jiang Luhong, Chen Zhujiang, Yang Bo
{"title":"经椎体后外侧上部单侧穿刺治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折","authors":"Deng-Jing Chuang, H. Shengli, X. Wei, Jiang Luhong, Chen Zhujiang, Yang Bo","doi":"10.25236/fmsr.2022.040503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Objective: To comprehensively analyze the effect of unilateral and bilateral puncture in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).Methods: The main subjects of this study were: OVCFs patients (a total of 100 cases, starting from October 2020 and ending from October 2021). According to the different treatment methods, two groups (50 cases in each group) were named, one group was the control group (applying bilateral puncture treatment through the vertebral body), the other group was the experimental group (unilateral puncture treatment through the vertebral body).Results: Compared with the control group, the operation time of the experimental group was shorter, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the experimental group was less, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, the amount of bone cement filling and X-ray exposure in the experimental group were significantly less, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, there was no difference in bone cement leakage rate in the experimental group (P > 0.05). Before treatment, compared with the control group, there were no differences in Cobb Angle, pain degree score, spinal dysfunction score and quality of life score between the experimental group and the control group, P > 0.05; After treatment, compared with the control group, the quality of life score of the experimental group was higher, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, the Cobb Angle, pain degree score and spinal dysfunction score of the injured vertebrae in the experimental group were lower, P < 0.05.Conclusion: Unilateral puncture through posterior and upper vertebral body is more effective than bilateral puncture in OVCFs patients.","PeriodicalId":129141,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medical Science Research","volume":"2007 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by unilateral puncture through the posterior outer upper part of the vertebral body\",\"authors\":\"Deng-Jing Chuang, H. Shengli, X. Wei, Jiang Luhong, Chen Zhujiang, Yang Bo\",\"doi\":\"10.25236/fmsr.2022.040503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Objective: To comprehensively analyze the effect of unilateral and bilateral puncture in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).Methods: The main subjects of this study were: OVCFs patients (a total of 100 cases, starting from October 2020 and ending from October 2021). According to the different treatment methods, two groups (50 cases in each group) were named, one group was the control group (applying bilateral puncture treatment through the vertebral body), the other group was the experimental group (unilateral puncture treatment through the vertebral body).Results: Compared with the control group, the operation time of the experimental group was shorter, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the experimental group was less, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, the amount of bone cement filling and X-ray exposure in the experimental group were significantly less, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, there was no difference in bone cement leakage rate in the experimental group (P > 0.05). Before treatment, compared with the control group, there were no differences in Cobb Angle, pain degree score, spinal dysfunction score and quality of life score between the experimental group and the control group, P > 0.05; After treatment, compared with the control group, the quality of life score of the experimental group was higher, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, the Cobb Angle, pain degree score and spinal dysfunction score of the injured vertebrae in the experimental group were lower, P < 0.05.Conclusion: Unilateral puncture through posterior and upper vertebral body is more effective than bilateral puncture in OVCFs patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medical Science Research\",\"volume\":\"2007 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medical Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25236/fmsr.2022.040503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medical Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25236/fmsr.2022.040503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:综合分析单侧和双侧穿刺治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)的效果。方法:本研究的主要对象为:OVCFs患者(共100例,从2020年10月开始至2021年10月结束)。根据治疗方法的不同,分为两组(每组50例),一组为对照组(双侧经椎体穿刺治疗),另一组为实验组(单侧经椎体穿刺治疗)。结果:与对照组比较,实验组手术时间短,P < 0.05;与对照组比较,实验组术中出血量较少,P < 0.05;与对照组比较,实验组骨水泥充填量和x线暴露量均显著减少,P < 0.05;实验组骨水泥渗漏率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。治疗前,与对照组比较,实验组与对照组的Cobb角、疼痛程度评分、脊柱功能障碍评分、生活质量评分比较,差异均无统计学意义,P > 0.05;治疗后,与对照组比较,实验组患者的生活质量评分较高,P < 0.05;与对照组比较,实验组损伤椎体的Cobb角、疼痛度评分、脊柱功能障碍评分均较对照组低,P < 0.05。结论:OVCFs患者单侧经椎体后上部穿刺优于双侧穿刺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by unilateral puncture through the posterior outer upper part of the vertebral body
: Objective: To comprehensively analyze the effect of unilateral and bilateral puncture in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).Methods: The main subjects of this study were: OVCFs patients (a total of 100 cases, starting from October 2020 and ending from October 2021). According to the different treatment methods, two groups (50 cases in each group) were named, one group was the control group (applying bilateral puncture treatment through the vertebral body), the other group was the experimental group (unilateral puncture treatment through the vertebral body).Results: Compared with the control group, the operation time of the experimental group was shorter, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the experimental group was less, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, the amount of bone cement filling and X-ray exposure in the experimental group were significantly less, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, there was no difference in bone cement leakage rate in the experimental group (P > 0.05). Before treatment, compared with the control group, there were no differences in Cobb Angle, pain degree score, spinal dysfunction score and quality of life score between the experimental group and the control group, P > 0.05; After treatment, compared with the control group, the quality of life score of the experimental group was higher, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, the Cobb Angle, pain degree score and spinal dysfunction score of the injured vertebrae in the experimental group were lower, P < 0.05.Conclusion: Unilateral puncture through posterior and upper vertebral body is more effective than bilateral puncture in OVCFs patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信