{"title":"结构主义","authors":"T. Stewart","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the twentieth century, much of linguistic research shifted in focus from diachronic to synchronic description. The challenge of expanding the database of languages well beyond Indo-European brought about the need to describe languages on their own terms instead of importing alien preconceptions and expectations. Alongside the growth in language resources, there was also a need among practitioners to establish a coherent and reliable set of analytical concepts and methods for synchronic research. This chapter surveys these developments and highlights the enduring relevance of the work.","PeriodicalId":179381,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structuralism\",\"authors\":\"T. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the twentieth century, much of linguistic research shifted in focus from diachronic to synchronic description. The challenge of expanding the database of languages well beyond Indo-European brought about the need to describe languages on their own terms instead of importing alien preconceptions and expectations. Alongside the growth in language resources, there was also a need among practitioners to establish a coherent and reliable set of analytical concepts and methods for synchronic research. This chapter surveys these developments and highlights the enduring relevance of the work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
During the twentieth century, much of linguistic research shifted in focus from diachronic to synchronic description. The challenge of expanding the database of languages well beyond Indo-European brought about the need to describe languages on their own terms instead of importing alien preconceptions and expectations. Alongside the growth in language resources, there was also a need among practitioners to establish a coherent and reliable set of analytical concepts and methods for synchronic research. This chapter surveys these developments and highlights the enduring relevance of the work.