反重力跑步机对骨科病人步态质量的影响:一项系统综述

{"title":"反重力跑步机对骨科病人步态质量的影响:一项系统综述","authors":"","doi":"10.46409/002.geoc2134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To identify the effectiveness of anti-gravity treadmill (AGT) on gait quality of patients with orthopedic conditions through a systematic review. \n\nMethods: Search was conducted in databases such as Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Database (PEDro), ScienceDirect, and NCBI for the articles published between January 2011 and April 2022. Included studies undergo data extraction, methodological quality assessment using the PEDro Scale and JBI Critical Appraisal Tool, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. The main outcome evaluated in this study is the gait quality. \n\nResults: Out of 147 publications found, 11 studies with the mean of 37 the review included subjects. Anti-gravity treadmill appears to be effective equal to standard rehabilitation in improving the gait quality and the overall function of the patient. \n\nDiscussion: The use of anti-gravity treadmill is safe and reliable, and it can be a complementary therapeutic option for improving gait quality in patients with lower extremity orthopedic conditions. However, due to the risk of bias assessment, there is no conclusive evidence to support the claims. To increase evidence power, studies with higher methodological quality and larger samples are required.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of anti-gravity treadmill on gait quality of patients with orthopedic conditions: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.46409/002.geoc2134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: To identify the effectiveness of anti-gravity treadmill (AGT) on gait quality of patients with orthopedic conditions through a systematic review. \\n\\nMethods: Search was conducted in databases such as Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Database (PEDro), ScienceDirect, and NCBI for the articles published between January 2011 and April 2022. Included studies undergo data extraction, methodological quality assessment using the PEDro Scale and JBI Critical Appraisal Tool, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. The main outcome evaluated in this study is the gait quality. \\n\\nResults: Out of 147 publications found, 11 studies with the mean of 37 the review included subjects. Anti-gravity treadmill appears to be effective equal to standard rehabilitation in improving the gait quality and the overall function of the patient. \\n\\nDiscussion: The use of anti-gravity treadmill is safe and reliable, and it can be a complementary therapeutic option for improving gait quality in patients with lower extremity orthopedic conditions. However, due to the risk of bias assessment, there is no conclusive evidence to support the claims. To increase evidence power, studies with higher methodological quality and larger samples are required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.geoc2134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.geoc2134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:通过系统综述,确定反重力跑步机(AGT)对骨科患者步态质量的影响。方法:在Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、Physiotherapy Database (PEDro)、ScienceDirect和NCBI等数据库中检索2011年1月至2022年4月发表的文章。纳入的研究进行数据提取,使用PEDro量表和JBI关键评估工具进行方法学质量评估,并使用Cochrane协作的偏倚风险评估工具评估偏倚风险。本研究评估的主要结果是步态质量。结果:在147篇文献中,11篇研究(平均37篇)纳入了研究对象。在改善步态质量和患者整体功能方面,反重力跑步机似乎与标准康复一样有效。讨论:使用反重力跑步机是安全可靠的,它可以作为改善下肢矫形疾病患者步态质量的补充治疗选择。然而,由于存在偏见评估的风险,没有确凿的证据支持这些说法。为了增加证据的效力,需要更高的方法学质量和更大的样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of anti-gravity treadmill on gait quality of patients with orthopedic conditions: a systematic review
Introduction: To identify the effectiveness of anti-gravity treadmill (AGT) on gait quality of patients with orthopedic conditions through a systematic review. Methods: Search was conducted in databases such as Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Database (PEDro), ScienceDirect, and NCBI for the articles published between January 2011 and April 2022. Included studies undergo data extraction, methodological quality assessment using the PEDro Scale and JBI Critical Appraisal Tool, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. The main outcome evaluated in this study is the gait quality. Results: Out of 147 publications found, 11 studies with the mean of 37 the review included subjects. Anti-gravity treadmill appears to be effective equal to standard rehabilitation in improving the gait quality and the overall function of the patient. Discussion: The use of anti-gravity treadmill is safe and reliable, and it can be a complementary therapeutic option for improving gait quality in patients with lower extremity orthopedic conditions. However, due to the risk of bias assessment, there is no conclusive evidence to support the claims. To increase evidence power, studies with higher methodological quality and larger samples are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信