T. Schroeder-Kurth
{"title":"Präimplantationsdiagnostik in Deutschland – ganz oder gar nicht!","authors":"T. Schroeder-Kurth","doi":"10.30965/29498570-04602006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Through the statement of the Bioethics Commission of the State Rheinland-Pfalz (EK-RhPf) and the draft guidelines for the use of PGD of the Federal Medical Association (REP-BÄK) the debate about PGD in Germany is clearly headed towards an introduction of the technique. Both papers fail to deal adequately with some of the most important medical facts as well as legal and ethical aspects: embryo destruction in the course of diagnostic procedures or necessary research; the initiation of a trial pregnancy conditional on the results of prenatal diagnosis – a practice which contradicts the aims usually stated in favour of PGD; diagnostic indications intended to restrict the use of the technique are impractical in the light of previous experience with prenatal diagnosis. The REPBÄK tries to squeeze PGD techniques, procedures and aims into the existing guidelines for IVF despite profound differences. If PGD is to be introduced then these half-hearted would-be-solutions must be replaced by a clear and complete presentation of the facts as well as the moral problems and legal consequences including the abandonment of embryo protection as we know it. Society needs complete information, honest ethical discussion and legal security for a decision: PGD – yes or no!","PeriodicalId":288000,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik","volume":"1986 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/29498570-04602006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过莱茵-普法尔茨州生物伦理委员会(EK-RhPf)的声明和联邦医学协会的PGD使用指南草案(REP-BÄK),德国关于PGD的辩论显然朝着引入该技术的方向发展。这两篇论文都未能充分处理一些最重要的医学事实以及法律和伦理方面的问题:在诊断程序或必要的研究过程中破坏胚胎;以产前诊断结果为条件开始试产,这一做法与通常支持PGD的目标相矛盾;根据以前产前诊断的经验,限制使用该技术的诊断指征是不切实际的。REPBÄK试图将PGD技术、程序和目标挤压到现有的试管婴儿指南中,尽管存在着巨大的差异。如果要引入PGD,那么这些半心半意的解决办法必须被一个清晰和完整的事实陈述所取代,以及道德问题和法律后果,包括我们所知道的放弃胚胎保护。社会需要完整的信息,诚实的道德讨论和法律保障的决定:PGD -是或否!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Präimplantationsdiagnostik in Deutschland – ganz oder gar nicht!
Through the statement of the Bioethics Commission of the State Rheinland-Pfalz (EK-RhPf) and the draft guidelines for the use of PGD of the Federal Medical Association (REP-BÄK) the debate about PGD in Germany is clearly headed towards an introduction of the technique. Both papers fail to deal adequately with some of the most important medical facts as well as legal and ethical aspects: embryo destruction in the course of diagnostic procedures or necessary research; the initiation of a trial pregnancy conditional on the results of prenatal diagnosis – a practice which contradicts the aims usually stated in favour of PGD; diagnostic indications intended to restrict the use of the technique are impractical in the light of previous experience with prenatal diagnosis. The REPBÄK tries to squeeze PGD techniques, procedures and aims into the existing guidelines for IVF despite profound differences. If PGD is to be introduced then these half-hearted would-be-solutions must be replaced by a clear and complete presentation of the facts as well as the moral problems and legal consequences including the abandonment of embryo protection as we know it. Society needs complete information, honest ethical discussion and legal security for a decision: PGD – yes or no!
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信