作为改革运动的协商民主

Janette Hartz-Karp, L. Carson, Michael K. Briand
{"title":"作为改革运动的协商民主","authors":"Janette Hartz-Karp, L. Carson, Michael K. Briand","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198747369.013.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many organizations, actors and alliances across the globe have advocated for and implemented elements of deliberative democracy, effectively addressing policy, political and national issues. Examples include the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review, Participatory Budgeting (multiple locations worldwide, including “100 Percent” of some municipality budgets in Australia), the Danish Board of Technology’s Consensus Conferences, Deliberative Polls (even in China), Citizens’ Juries (in numerous democratic states), and grassroots Constitutional Conventions in Ireland, Iceland, and Belgium. It is unclear, though, whether such efforts collectively amount to a social movement. Institutionalization has been difficult to achieve, chiefly because power is rarely given up or shared. Nor can we say whether deliberative democracy initiatives have reached a tipping point at which current political practices might begin to take on a more deliberative form. For deliberative democratic principles and practice to occur and be sustained, social and political change organizations and government will need to work together.","PeriodicalId":185217,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deliberative Democracy as a Reform Movement\",\"authors\":\"Janette Hartz-Karp, L. Carson, Michael K. Briand\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198747369.013.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many organizations, actors and alliances across the globe have advocated for and implemented elements of deliberative democracy, effectively addressing policy, political and national issues. Examples include the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review, Participatory Budgeting (multiple locations worldwide, including “100 Percent” of some municipality budgets in Australia), the Danish Board of Technology’s Consensus Conferences, Deliberative Polls (even in China), Citizens’ Juries (in numerous democratic states), and grassroots Constitutional Conventions in Ireland, Iceland, and Belgium. It is unclear, though, whether such efforts collectively amount to a social movement. Institutionalization has been difficult to achieve, chiefly because power is rarely given up or shared. Nor can we say whether deliberative democracy initiatives have reached a tipping point at which current political practices might begin to take on a more deliberative form. For deliberative democratic principles and practice to occur and be sustained, social and political change organizations and government will need to work together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198747369.013.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198747369.013.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

全球许多组织、行动者和联盟都倡导并实施了协商民主的要素,有效地处理了政策、政治和国家问题。例子包括俄勒冈州公民倡议审查、参与式预算(全球多个地点,包括澳大利亚一些市政预算的“100%”)、丹麦技术委员会的共识会议、审议性民意调查(甚至在中国)、公民陪审团(在许多民主国家),以及爱尔兰、冰岛和比利时的基层制宪大会。不过,目前尚不清楚这些努力是否合在一起构成了一场社会运动。制度化很难实现,主要是因为权力很少被放弃或分享。我们也不能说,协商民主倡议是否已经达到了一个临界点,在这个临界点上,当前的政治实践可能开始采取一种更加协商的形式。要使协商民主原则和实践得以实现并持续下去,社会和政治变革组织和政府将需要共同努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deliberative Democracy as a Reform Movement
Many organizations, actors and alliances across the globe have advocated for and implemented elements of deliberative democracy, effectively addressing policy, political and national issues. Examples include the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review, Participatory Budgeting (multiple locations worldwide, including “100 Percent” of some municipality budgets in Australia), the Danish Board of Technology’s Consensus Conferences, Deliberative Polls (even in China), Citizens’ Juries (in numerous democratic states), and grassroots Constitutional Conventions in Ireland, Iceland, and Belgium. It is unclear, though, whether such efforts collectively amount to a social movement. Institutionalization has been difficult to achieve, chiefly because power is rarely given up or shared. Nor can we say whether deliberative democracy initiatives have reached a tipping point at which current political practices might begin to take on a more deliberative form. For deliberative democratic principles and practice to occur and be sustained, social and political change organizations and government will need to work together.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信