旋翼机安全风险管理中每飞行小时风险的适当计算

J. Hewitt, D. Loan
{"title":"旋翼机安全风险管理中每飞行小时风险的适当计算","authors":"J. Hewitt, D. Loan","doi":"10.4050/f-0076-2020-16347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Quantitative Risk Assessment has become essential in rotorcraft safety risk management. Measures of risk include Cumulative Fleet Risk (also called Risk Factor), Risk per Flight, and Risk per Flight Hour. Each measure applies to a different situation and can produce the same or different predictions of future risk. Risk for a large fleet of aircraft might be accurately predicted by Cumulative Fleet Risk, whereas Risk per Flight or Risk per Flight Hour might be best for a small fleet of rotorcraft, a flight test program, or a fleet with low flight hours. Calculating risk per flight hour seems as simple as dividing the number of previous occurrences by the flight hours for the total fleet, but this is appropriate only in the case of random distribution. Most failures that lead to hazards are not random because the failure mechanism has a specific cause. A more appropriate method is to develop the future event forecast using Quantitative Risk Assessment, then divide that by the future fleet hours. The simple division process requires only two numbers and can be completed quickly, but with a possibly inappropriate or misleading result for anything but a random distribution. The approach presented here results in a risk prediction that is appropriate for hazard rates that are increasing, decreasing, or constant, and for non-random distributions, which could prevent misleading or unconservative risk management decisions.\n","PeriodicalId":293921,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 76th Annual Forum","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriate Calculation of Risk per Flight Hour for Rotorcraft Safety Risk Management\",\"authors\":\"J. Hewitt, D. Loan\",\"doi\":\"10.4050/f-0076-2020-16347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Quantitative Risk Assessment has become essential in rotorcraft safety risk management. Measures of risk include Cumulative Fleet Risk (also called Risk Factor), Risk per Flight, and Risk per Flight Hour. Each measure applies to a different situation and can produce the same or different predictions of future risk. Risk for a large fleet of aircraft might be accurately predicted by Cumulative Fleet Risk, whereas Risk per Flight or Risk per Flight Hour might be best for a small fleet of rotorcraft, a flight test program, or a fleet with low flight hours. Calculating risk per flight hour seems as simple as dividing the number of previous occurrences by the flight hours for the total fleet, but this is appropriate only in the case of random distribution. Most failures that lead to hazards are not random because the failure mechanism has a specific cause. A more appropriate method is to develop the future event forecast using Quantitative Risk Assessment, then divide that by the future fleet hours. The simple division process requires only two numbers and can be completed quickly, but with a possibly inappropriate or misleading result for anything but a random distribution. The approach presented here results in a risk prediction that is appropriate for hazard rates that are increasing, decreasing, or constant, and for non-random distributions, which could prevent misleading or unconservative risk management decisions.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":293921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 76th Annual Forum\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 76th Annual Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0076-2020-16347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 76th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0076-2020-16347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定量风险评估已成为旋翼机安全风险管理的重要内容。风险度量包括累积机队风险(也称为风险因子)、每次飞行风险和每飞行小时风险。每种测量方法适用于不同的情况,可以对未来风险做出相同或不同的预测。累积机队风险可以准确地预测大型机队的风险,而每次飞行风险或每飞行小时风险可能最适合小型旋翼飞机机队,飞行测试项目或飞行时间较低的机队。计算每飞行小时的风险似乎很简单,只需将以前发生的次数除以整个机队的飞行小时数,但这只适用于随机分布的情况。大多数导致危险的故障不是随机的,因为故障机制有特定的原因。更合适的方法是使用定量风险评估进行未来事件预测,然后除以未来的船队小时数。简单的除法过程只需要两个数字,可以快速完成,但对于随机分布以外的任何情况都可能产生不合适或误导性的结果。这里提出的方法导致风险预测适用于增加、减少或恒定的风险率,以及非随机分布,这可以防止误导或不保守的风险管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appropriate Calculation of Risk per Flight Hour for Rotorcraft Safety Risk Management
Quantitative Risk Assessment has become essential in rotorcraft safety risk management. Measures of risk include Cumulative Fleet Risk (also called Risk Factor), Risk per Flight, and Risk per Flight Hour. Each measure applies to a different situation and can produce the same or different predictions of future risk. Risk for a large fleet of aircraft might be accurately predicted by Cumulative Fleet Risk, whereas Risk per Flight or Risk per Flight Hour might be best for a small fleet of rotorcraft, a flight test program, or a fleet with low flight hours. Calculating risk per flight hour seems as simple as dividing the number of previous occurrences by the flight hours for the total fleet, but this is appropriate only in the case of random distribution. Most failures that lead to hazards are not random because the failure mechanism has a specific cause. A more appropriate method is to develop the future event forecast using Quantitative Risk Assessment, then divide that by the future fleet hours. The simple division process requires only two numbers and can be completed quickly, but with a possibly inappropriate or misleading result for anything but a random distribution. The approach presented here results in a risk prediction that is appropriate for hazard rates that are increasing, decreasing, or constant, and for non-random distributions, which could prevent misleading or unconservative risk management decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信