超声引导下膝神经阻滞治疗伴有神经性疼痛的膝骨性关节炎的疗效

Rajshree Rathore, M. Joshi, Anchin Saharan, Himanshu Agrawal
{"title":"超声引导下膝神经阻滞治疗伴有神经性疼痛的膝骨性关节炎的疗效","authors":"Rajshree Rathore, M. Joshi, Anchin Saharan, Himanshu Agrawal","doi":"10.4103/ijpmr.ijpmr_9_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) remains one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders. It was thought to be a non-inflammatory, wear and tear disorder, but recent studies have suggested the presence of a neuropathic pain component. Genicular nerve block has emerged as a new intervention to manage the neuropathic component of pain in knee OA. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective, hospital-based descriptive interventional study. Persons having OA with neuropathic pain component were identified using PainDETECT scale. We randomised the participants meeting the inclusion criteria into two groups. In the study group with thirty participants, we performed an ultrasound-guided triple-site genicular nerve block. The control group of equal size underwent conservative management. Participants were assessed using PainDETECT scale, Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Results: In the study group, PainDETECT score decreased from 24.93 ± 1.99 at baseline to 8.07 ± 2.97 at 2 weeks and 7.9 ± 2.87 at 4 weeks. WOMAC significantly improved in the study group from 94.27 ± 8.35 to 48.43 ± 10.14 at 4 weeks. VAS score also decreased in the study group from 9.2 ± 0.71 to 4.73 ± 1.44 at 2 weeks and 4.53 ± 1.28 at 4 weeks. The control group also showed a significant decrease in PainDETECT score from 24.13 ± 1.17 to 12.07 ± 1.36 at 4 weeks. However, a decrease in VAS score (from 9.13 ± 0.68 to 7.67 ± 0.67 at 4 weeks) and WOMAC (from 97 ± 4.49 to 88.5 ± 4.93 at 4 weeks) was less significant. Conclusion: Genicular nerve block provides significant pain relief and improved functional outcome in OA knee with neuropathic pain component. Furthermore, it is more effective than conservative management.","PeriodicalId":220492,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block in knee osteoarthritis with neuropathic pain\",\"authors\":\"Rajshree Rathore, M. Joshi, Anchin Saharan, Himanshu Agrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijpmr.ijpmr_9_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) remains one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders. It was thought to be a non-inflammatory, wear and tear disorder, but recent studies have suggested the presence of a neuropathic pain component. Genicular nerve block has emerged as a new intervention to manage the neuropathic component of pain in knee OA. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective, hospital-based descriptive interventional study. Persons having OA with neuropathic pain component were identified using PainDETECT scale. We randomised the participants meeting the inclusion criteria into two groups. In the study group with thirty participants, we performed an ultrasound-guided triple-site genicular nerve block. The control group of equal size underwent conservative management. Participants were assessed using PainDETECT scale, Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Results: In the study group, PainDETECT score decreased from 24.93 ± 1.99 at baseline to 8.07 ± 2.97 at 2 weeks and 7.9 ± 2.87 at 4 weeks. WOMAC significantly improved in the study group from 94.27 ± 8.35 to 48.43 ± 10.14 at 4 weeks. VAS score also decreased in the study group from 9.2 ± 0.71 to 4.73 ± 1.44 at 2 weeks and 4.53 ± 1.28 at 4 weeks. The control group also showed a significant decrease in PainDETECT score from 24.13 ± 1.17 to 12.07 ± 1.36 at 4 weeks. However, a decrease in VAS score (from 9.13 ± 0.68 to 7.67 ± 0.67 at 4 weeks) and WOMAC (from 97 ± 4.49 to 88.5 ± 4.93 at 4 weeks) was less significant. Conclusion: Genicular nerve block provides significant pain relief and improved functional outcome in OA knee with neuropathic pain component. Furthermore, it is more effective than conservative management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpmr.ijpmr_9_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpmr.ijpmr_9_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨关节炎(OA)是最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病之一。它被认为是一种非炎症性的磨损性疾病,但最近的研究表明存在神经性疼痛成分。膝神经阻滞已成为一种新的干预措施,以管理膝关节OA疼痛的神经性成分。材料和方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性的、以医院为基础的描述性介入研究。使用PainDETECT量表对伴有神经性疼痛成分的OA患者进行鉴定。我们将符合纳入标准的参与者随机分为两组。在30名参与者的研究组中,我们进行了超声引导的三位点膝神经阻滞。同等大小的对照组采用保守治疗。在基线、2周和4周时,采用PainDETECT量表、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和西安大略麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)对参与者进行评估。结果:研究组的PainDETECT评分从基线时的24.93±1.99下降到2周时的8.07±2.97,4周时的7.9±2.87。研究组的WOMAC在4周时从94.27±8.35显著提高到48.43±10.14。研究组VAS评分从9.2±0.71降至2周时的4.73±1.44,4周时的4.53±1.28。4周时,对照组的PainDETECT评分由24.13±1.17降至12.07±1.36。然而,VAS评分(4周时从9.13±0.68降至7.67±0.67)和WOMAC(4周时从97±4.49降至88.5±4.93)的下降不太显著。结论:膝神经阻滞可显著缓解伴有神经性疼痛成分的OA膝疼痛,改善功能预后。此外,它比保守管理更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block in knee osteoarthritis with neuropathic pain
Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) remains one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders. It was thought to be a non-inflammatory, wear and tear disorder, but recent studies have suggested the presence of a neuropathic pain component. Genicular nerve block has emerged as a new intervention to manage the neuropathic component of pain in knee OA. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective, hospital-based descriptive interventional study. Persons having OA with neuropathic pain component were identified using PainDETECT scale. We randomised the participants meeting the inclusion criteria into two groups. In the study group with thirty participants, we performed an ultrasound-guided triple-site genicular nerve block. The control group of equal size underwent conservative management. Participants were assessed using PainDETECT scale, Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Results: In the study group, PainDETECT score decreased from 24.93 ± 1.99 at baseline to 8.07 ± 2.97 at 2 weeks and 7.9 ± 2.87 at 4 weeks. WOMAC significantly improved in the study group from 94.27 ± 8.35 to 48.43 ± 10.14 at 4 weeks. VAS score also decreased in the study group from 9.2 ± 0.71 to 4.73 ± 1.44 at 2 weeks and 4.53 ± 1.28 at 4 weeks. The control group also showed a significant decrease in PainDETECT score from 24.13 ± 1.17 to 12.07 ± 1.36 at 4 weeks. However, a decrease in VAS score (from 9.13 ± 0.68 to 7.67 ± 0.67 at 4 weeks) and WOMAC (from 97 ± 4.49 to 88.5 ± 4.93 at 4 weeks) was less significant. Conclusion: Genicular nerve block provides significant pain relief and improved functional outcome in OA knee with neuropathic pain component. Furthermore, it is more effective than conservative management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信