运用个性化提高体验抽样的依从性

P. Markopoulos, N. Batalas, A. Timmermans
{"title":"运用个性化提高体验抽样的依从性","authors":"P. Markopoulos, N. Batalas, A. Timmermans","doi":"10.1145/2788412.2788427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that allowing personalization can increase respondent adherence in experience sampling studies. We report a one week long field experiment (N=36), which compared response rates when respondents select the times at which they are prompted to report in an experience sampling protocol (experimental group), versus the situation where these times are selected by the experimenter (control group). Results showed that participants who could choose their time slots showed a significantly higher response rate than participants who received the questions on preset time slots (p=0.002). There was no difference in response rates for different times of the day. Social influence, as permitted through the personalization process is offered as one of the explanations for enhancing compliance to the experience sampling probes. Future research needs to establish whether this or other practical explanations regarding respondent convenience explain the increased adherence and whether the found effect can be sustained for longer studies.","PeriodicalId":191085,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Use of Personalization to Enhance Compliance in Experience Sampling\",\"authors\":\"P. Markopoulos, N. Batalas, A. Timmermans\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2788412.2788427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that allowing personalization can increase respondent adherence in experience sampling studies. We report a one week long field experiment (N=36), which compared response rates when respondents select the times at which they are prompted to report in an experience sampling protocol (experimental group), versus the situation where these times are selected by the experimenter (control group). Results showed that participants who could choose their time slots showed a significantly higher response rate than participants who received the questions on preset time slots (p=0.002). There was no difference in response rates for different times of the day. Social influence, as permitted through the personalization process is offered as one of the explanations for enhancing compliance to the experience sampling probes. Future research needs to establish whether this or other practical explanations regarding respondent convenience explain the increased adherence and whether the found effect can be sustained for longer studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2788412.2788427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2788412.2788427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本文认为,在经验抽样研究中,允许个性化可以增加被调查者的依从性。我们报告了一项为期一周的现场实验(N=36),该实验比较了受访者在经验抽样协议中选择他们被提示报告的时间(实验组)与这些时间由实验者(对照组)选择的情况下的反应率。结果显示,可选择时间段的被试答题率显著高于预设时间段的被试(p=0.002)。一天中不同时间的反应率没有差异。社会影响,作为允许通过个性化的过程提供了一个解释,以提高依从性的经验抽样调查。未来的研究需要确定这种或其他关于被调查者便利的实际解释是否解释了依从性的增加,以及所发现的效果是否可以持续更长时间的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Use of Personalization to Enhance Compliance in Experience Sampling
This paper argues that allowing personalization can increase respondent adherence in experience sampling studies. We report a one week long field experiment (N=36), which compared response rates when respondents select the times at which they are prompted to report in an experience sampling protocol (experimental group), versus the situation where these times are selected by the experimenter (control group). Results showed that participants who could choose their time slots showed a significantly higher response rate than participants who received the questions on preset time slots (p=0.002). There was no difference in response rates for different times of the day. Social influence, as permitted through the personalization process is offered as one of the explanations for enhancing compliance to the experience sampling probes. Future research needs to establish whether this or other practical explanations regarding respondent convenience explain the increased adherence and whether the found effect can be sustained for longer studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信