Tham Luong Thi Thu, Yen Nguyen Hoang Phuong, Quyen Le Nhat, Thuy Tran Thi Phuong, Hoa Tran Thi, Thao Vo Thi, Hai Nguyen Thi Hong, Tam Tran Thi Quynh, Dan Nguyen Duc, Dan Ho Thi Linh, Hieu Ho, Khanh Nguyen Phi, Vinh Vo Van Quang, Lieu Dinh Thi, Khuyen Nguyen Ngo Bao, Dan Chau Nguyen, Nha Dang Thi Thanh, Anh Hoang Tuan, Phuong Ha Minh, Minh Nguyen Hoang, Thang Phan Van, Duong Le Dinh, Thang Tran Binh, Tu Nguyen Minh, Gia Nguyen Thanh
{"title":"顺化医药大学医学生学业压力及相关因素分析","authors":"Tham Luong Thi Thu, Yen Nguyen Hoang Phuong, Quyen Le Nhat, Thuy Tran Thi Phuong, Hoa Tran Thi, Thao Vo Thi, Hai Nguyen Thi Hong, Tam Tran Thi Quynh, Dan Nguyen Duc, Dan Ho Thi Linh, Hieu Ho, Khanh Nguyen Phi, Vinh Vo Van Quang, Lieu Dinh Thi, Khuyen Nguyen Ngo Bao, Dan Chau Nguyen, Nha Dang Thi Thanh, Anh Hoang Tuan, Phuong Ha Minh, Minh Nguyen Hoang, Thang Phan Van, Duong Le Dinh, Thang Tran Binh, Tu Nguyen Minh, Gia Nguyen Thanh","doi":"10.53522/ytcc.vi60.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To identify the prevalence of academic pressure and to analyze relatedfactorsamongmedical students of Hue university of Medicine and Pharmacy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 878 medical students usingtheEducationalStress Scale for Adolescents (ESSA). Result: The prevalence of academic pressure among students was 59.3%. Factors relatedtoacademic pressure wererst-year students with OR = 1.60; third-year students with R .88; ood or excellent ranking with OR = 0.71; average or weak or poor ranking with R .19; onthly allowance from 1.5 to under 2.3 million Dong with OR = 1.57; not participating n ports r exercise with OR = 1.52; not satised with the health with OR = 1.86; not satised ith ocial elationships with OR = 1.79; reasons for choosing theeld study due to orientation o parents th OR = 1.83; unsatised with the quality of lecturers with OR = 143; and usatised wth iversity administration with OR = 0.61. Conclusion: Students should be provided with the appropriate coping strategies for aademic essure and encouraged to participate in exercise and sports.","PeriodicalId":170809,"journal":{"name":"Tạp chí Y tế Công cộng","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic stress and related factors among medical students of Hue university of Medicine andPharmacy\",\"authors\":\"Tham Luong Thi Thu, Yen Nguyen Hoang Phuong, Quyen Le Nhat, Thuy Tran Thi Phuong, Hoa Tran Thi, Thao Vo Thi, Hai Nguyen Thi Hong, Tam Tran Thi Quynh, Dan Nguyen Duc, Dan Ho Thi Linh, Hieu Ho, Khanh Nguyen Phi, Vinh Vo Van Quang, Lieu Dinh Thi, Khuyen Nguyen Ngo Bao, Dan Chau Nguyen, Nha Dang Thi Thanh, Anh Hoang Tuan, Phuong Ha Minh, Minh Nguyen Hoang, Thang Phan Van, Duong Le Dinh, Thang Tran Binh, Tu Nguyen Minh, Gia Nguyen Thanh\",\"doi\":\"10.53522/ytcc.vi60.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To identify the prevalence of academic pressure and to analyze relatedfactorsamongmedical students of Hue university of Medicine and Pharmacy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 878 medical students usingtheEducationalStress Scale for Adolescents (ESSA). Result: The prevalence of academic pressure among students was 59.3%. Factors relatedtoacademic pressure wererst-year students with OR = 1.60; third-year students with R .88; ood or excellent ranking with OR = 0.71; average or weak or poor ranking with R .19; onthly allowance from 1.5 to under 2.3 million Dong with OR = 1.57; not participating n ports r exercise with OR = 1.52; not satised with the health with OR = 1.86; not satised ith ocial elationships with OR = 1.79; reasons for choosing theeld study due to orientation o parents th OR = 1.83; unsatised with the quality of lecturers with OR = 143; and usatised wth iversity administration with OR = 0.61. Conclusion: Students should be provided with the appropriate coping strategies for aademic essure and encouraged to participate in exercise and sports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tạp chí Y tế Công cộng\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tạp chí Y tế Công cộng\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53522/ytcc.vi60.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tạp chí Y tế Công cộng","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53522/ytcc.vi60.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:了解顺化医科大学医学生学业压力的现状,并分析其影响因素。方法:采用《青少年教育压力量表》(ESSA)对878名医学生进行横断面调查。结果:大学生学业压力患病率为59.3%。学业压力相关因素为rst-year, OR = 1.60;三年级学生,88卢比;良好或优秀排名or = 0.71;平均或较弱或较差的排名,R .19;每月津贴从150万越南盾降至230万越南盾以下,OR = 1.57;OR = 1.52,未参加港口或演习;健康不满意ed, OR = 1.86;社会关系不满意ed, OR = 1.79;家长取向导致选择eld研究的原因OR = 1.83;对讲师质量不满意ed, OR = 143;usatised与大学管理相关,OR = 0.61。结论:应为学生提供适当的学业压力应对策略,鼓励学生参加体育锻炼。
Academic stress and related factors among medical students of Hue university of Medicine andPharmacy
Objectives: To identify the prevalence of academic pressure and to analyze relatedfactorsamongmedical students of Hue university of Medicine and Pharmacy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 878 medical students usingtheEducationalStress Scale for Adolescents (ESSA). Result: The prevalence of academic pressure among students was 59.3%. Factors relatedtoacademic pressure wererst-year students with OR = 1.60; third-year students with R .88; ood or excellent ranking with OR = 0.71; average or weak or poor ranking with R .19; onthly allowance from 1.5 to under 2.3 million Dong with OR = 1.57; not participating n ports r exercise with OR = 1.52; not satised with the health with OR = 1.86; not satised ith ocial elationships with OR = 1.79; reasons for choosing theeld study due to orientation o parents th OR = 1.83; unsatised with the quality of lecturers with OR = 143; and usatised wth iversity administration with OR = 0.61. Conclusion: Students should be provided with the appropriate coping strategies for aademic essure and encouraged to participate in exercise and sports.