不同生物陶瓷根管密封剂对成骨细胞的体外评价

Letycia Accioly Simões Coelho
{"title":"不同生物陶瓷根管密封剂对成骨细胞的体外评价","authors":"Letycia Accioly Simões Coelho","doi":"10.23880/oajds-16000367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity and cell viability of two calcium silicate-based sealers. Material and Methods: Test specimens were made in a silicone matrix and divided into 4 groups (n=3) according to the sealer evaluated: control; Bio-C Sealer; EndoSequence BC and AH Plus. The sealers were weighed, sterilized with ethylene oxide, and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibioticantimycotic for 24 h (37±1°C). MTT and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assays were performed in osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells (Alizarin red staining). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p<0,05). Results: The greater cell vitality was observed in the control group at 24 h and in AH Plus at 48 h. At 72 h, there was no significant difference in MTT assay results between the groups (p>0.05). At 7 days, the control group had the best ALP assay result. At 10 days, the best results were found for the control group, Bio-C Sealer, and AH Plus, with a significant difference from EndoSequence BC (p<0.05). Conclusion: AH Plus sealer had higher levels of cell viability and bioactivity similar to the calcium silicate-based sealers, EndoSequence BC and Bio-C Sealer at 24 and 48 h.","PeriodicalId":206273,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro Evaluation of Osteoblasts Exposed to Different Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers\",\"authors\":\"Letycia Accioly Simões Coelho\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/oajds-16000367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity and cell viability of two calcium silicate-based sealers. Material and Methods: Test specimens were made in a silicone matrix and divided into 4 groups (n=3) according to the sealer evaluated: control; Bio-C Sealer; EndoSequence BC and AH Plus. The sealers were weighed, sterilized with ethylene oxide, and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibioticantimycotic for 24 h (37±1°C). MTT and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assays were performed in osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells (Alizarin red staining). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p<0,05). Results: The greater cell vitality was observed in the control group at 24 h and in AH Plus at 48 h. At 72 h, there was no significant difference in MTT assay results between the groups (p>0.05). At 7 days, the control group had the best ALP assay result. At 10 days, the best results were found for the control group, Bio-C Sealer, and AH Plus, with a significant difference from EndoSequence BC (p<0.05). Conclusion: AH Plus sealer had higher levels of cell viability and bioactivity similar to the calcium silicate-based sealers, EndoSequence BC and Bio-C Sealer at 24 and 48 h.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajds-16000367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajds-16000367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评价两种硅酸钙基封口剂的细胞毒性和细胞活力。材料与方法:在硅胶基体中制作试样,根据评价的密封剂分为4组(n=3):对照组;Bio-C封口机;EndoSequence BC和AH +。称重,环氧乙烷灭菌,在添加15%胎牛血清和1%抗生素抗真菌药的Dulbecco改良Eagle培养基中(37±1℃)培养24 h。成骨样SAOS-2细胞进行MTT和碱性磷酸酶(ALP)测定(茜素红染色)。数据分析采用方差分析和Tukey检验(p0.05)。在第7天,对照组的ALP测定结果最好。在第10天,对照组、Bio-C Sealer和AH Plus的结果最好,与EndoSequence BC有显著差异(p<0.05)。结论:AH +封口剂在24和48 h具有较高的细胞活力和生物活性,与硅酸钙封口剂、EndoSequence BC和Bio-C封口剂相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro Evaluation of Osteoblasts Exposed to Different Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity and cell viability of two calcium silicate-based sealers. Material and Methods: Test specimens were made in a silicone matrix and divided into 4 groups (n=3) according to the sealer evaluated: control; Bio-C Sealer; EndoSequence BC and AH Plus. The sealers were weighed, sterilized with ethylene oxide, and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibioticantimycotic for 24 h (37±1°C). MTT and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assays were performed in osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells (Alizarin red staining). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p<0,05). Results: The greater cell vitality was observed in the control group at 24 h and in AH Plus at 48 h. At 72 h, there was no significant difference in MTT assay results between the groups (p>0.05). At 7 days, the control group had the best ALP assay result. At 10 days, the best results were found for the control group, Bio-C Sealer, and AH Plus, with a significant difference from EndoSequence BC (p<0.05). Conclusion: AH Plus sealer had higher levels of cell viability and bioactivity similar to the calcium silicate-based sealers, EndoSequence BC and Bio-C Sealer at 24 and 48 h.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信