M. Domagalska-Grędys
{"title":"Kontekst innowacji w grupach producentów rolnych","authors":"M. Domagalska-Grędys","doi":"10.7366/WIR012016/08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the study described in the article is to identify and evaluate the context of shaping innovation in agricultural producer groups. The groups were perceived as a starting point to establish a network of farms within which the emergence of open innovation would be favoured. The context of innovation in groups of farmers was referred to the classical stakeholder theory based on closed innovation (Joseph Shumpeter) and open innovation promoted in collaborative networks by contemporary theorists (Henry Chesbrough and Clayton Christiansen, Everett M. Rogers). A secondary objective of the study was to answer a question whether the state of intragroup relations was a prerequisite for enhancing innovation on farms, taking into account the change of relations between different profiles of production, indicators of group dynamics, assessment of relations with the cooperating institutions. The study was conducted in 2015 among groups of agricultural producers of the Lesser Poland (Malopolska) province, by applying the method of direct interview. The results show the greatest commitment to innovation in the horticultural groups if they feature stable (unchanging) intra-group relations, average group indicators and a large number of co operating institutions.","PeriodicalId":124819,"journal":{"name":"Village and Agriculture","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Village and Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7366/WIR012016/08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文所述研究的主要目的是识别和评估农业生产者群体塑造创新的背景。这些组织被视为建立一个农场网络的起点,在这个网络中,开放式创新的出现将受到青睐。农民群体创新的语境参考了基于封闭创新(Joseph Shumpeter)和当代理论家(Henry Chesbrough和Clayton Christiansen, Everett M. Rogers)在协作网络中倡导的开放式创新的经典利益相关者理论。这项研究的第二个目标是回答一个问题,即考虑到不同生产状况之间关系的变化、群体动态指标、对与合作机构关系的评估,群体内部关系的状况是否是加强农场创新的先决条件。该研究于2015年在小波兰(Malopolska)省的农业生产者群体中进行,采用直接访谈的方法。结果表明,如果园艺集团具有稳定(不变)的集团内部关系、平均的集团指标和大量的合作机构,则园艺集团对创新的承诺最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kontekst innowacji w grupach producentów rolnych
The main objective of the study described in the article is to identify and evaluate the context of shaping innovation in agricultural producer groups. The groups were perceived as a starting point to establish a network of farms within which the emergence of open innovation would be favoured. The context of innovation in groups of farmers was referred to the classical stakeholder theory based on closed innovation (Joseph Shumpeter) and open innovation promoted in collaborative networks by contemporary theorists (Henry Chesbrough and Clayton Christiansen, Everett M. Rogers). A secondary objective of the study was to answer a question whether the state of intragroup relations was a prerequisite for enhancing innovation on farms, taking into account the change of relations between different profiles of production, indicators of group dynamics, assessment of relations with the cooperating institutions. The study was conducted in 2015 among groups of agricultural producers of the Lesser Poland (Malopolska) province, by applying the method of direct interview. The results show the greatest commitment to innovation in the horticultural groups if they feature stable (unchanging) intra-group relations, average group indicators and a large number of co operating institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信