NSF和PCE减水剂与不同水泥类型相容性的实验评价

L. Coppola, P. Marcassoli, S. Lorenzi
{"title":"NSF和PCE减水剂与不同水泥类型相容性的实验评价","authors":"L. Coppola, P. Marcassoli, S. Lorenzi","doi":"10.14359/18748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with variability in the performance of seven different superplasticizers that were chosen among those of most common use belonging to the naphthalene (NSF) and polycarboxylate-based (PCE) families. In particular, compatibility of two naphthalene-based and five polycarboxylate-based admixtures with six different cements available on the Italian market was evaluated by measuring water reduction to manufacture mortars with the same workability at the end of mixing. Two different lots of the same cement (same plant) were used: lot 1 and 2 produced, on September 2005 and March 2006 respectively. Flow attention up to sixty minutes and tendency to entrap air in the mortars were measured. Results confirmed that the average water reduction and flow retention properties are better for PCE compare to NSF superplasticizers. However, experimental data confirm as the performance of PCE admixtures are more strongly dependent on the cement type than those of NSF polymers. No differences were detected in terms of the air entrapped between the two superplasticizer families, except for the ACR(5) superplasticizer.","PeriodicalId":319247,"journal":{"name":"SP-243: 9th Canmet/ACI Int Conference on Recent Advances in Concrete Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Experimental Evaluation of the Compatibilty of NSF and PCE Superplasticizers with Different Cement Types\",\"authors\":\"L. Coppola, P. Marcassoli, S. Lorenzi\",\"doi\":\"10.14359/18748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with variability in the performance of seven different superplasticizers that were chosen among those of most common use belonging to the naphthalene (NSF) and polycarboxylate-based (PCE) families. In particular, compatibility of two naphthalene-based and five polycarboxylate-based admixtures with six different cements available on the Italian market was evaluated by measuring water reduction to manufacture mortars with the same workability at the end of mixing. Two different lots of the same cement (same plant) were used: lot 1 and 2 produced, on September 2005 and March 2006 respectively. Flow attention up to sixty minutes and tendency to entrap air in the mortars were measured. Results confirmed that the average water reduction and flow retention properties are better for PCE compare to NSF superplasticizers. However, experimental data confirm as the performance of PCE admixtures are more strongly dependent on the cement type than those of NSF polymers. No differences were detected in terms of the air entrapped between the two superplasticizer families, except for the ACR(5) superplasticizer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SP-243: 9th Canmet/ACI Int Conference on Recent Advances in Concrete Technology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SP-243: 9th Canmet/ACI Int Conference on Recent Advances in Concrete Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14359/18748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SP-243: 9th Canmet/ACI Int Conference on Recent Advances in Concrete Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/18748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文讨论了七种不同的高效减水剂的性能变化,这些减水剂是从萘(NSF)和聚羧酸盐(PCE)家族中最常用的减水剂中选择的。特别是,通过测量减水量来评估两种萘基和五种聚羧酸基外加剂与意大利市场上六种不同水泥的相容性,以便在混合结束时制造具有相同和易性的砂浆。使用了同一水泥(同一工厂)的两个不同批次:第1批次和第2批次分别于2005年9月和2006年3月生产。测量了长达60分钟的流动注意力和在迫击炮中捕获空气的趋势。结果表明,与NSF高效减水剂相比,PCE的平均减水量和流保持性能更好。然而,实验数据证实,与NSF聚合物相比,PCE外加剂的性能更强烈地依赖于水泥类型。除了ACR(5)型高效减水剂外,两种高效减水剂家族之间的空气夹持量没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Experimental Evaluation of the Compatibilty of NSF and PCE Superplasticizers with Different Cement Types
This paper deals with variability in the performance of seven different superplasticizers that were chosen among those of most common use belonging to the naphthalene (NSF) and polycarboxylate-based (PCE) families. In particular, compatibility of two naphthalene-based and five polycarboxylate-based admixtures with six different cements available on the Italian market was evaluated by measuring water reduction to manufacture mortars with the same workability at the end of mixing. Two different lots of the same cement (same plant) were used: lot 1 and 2 produced, on September 2005 and March 2006 respectively. Flow attention up to sixty minutes and tendency to entrap air in the mortars were measured. Results confirmed that the average water reduction and flow retention properties are better for PCE compare to NSF superplasticizers. However, experimental data confirm as the performance of PCE admixtures are more strongly dependent on the cement type than those of NSF polymers. No differences were detected in terms of the air entrapped between the two superplasticizer families, except for the ACR(5) superplasticizer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信