民族学方法对科学界的研究:性别取向的相关性

N. Pushkareva
{"title":"民族学方法对科学界的研究:性别取向的相关性","authors":"N. Pushkareva","doi":"10.32523/2616-7255-2020-133-4-100-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes the methodology and methods of ethnographic knowledge in the focus of their application in sociology and sociopsychology. The author turns to classical studies of M. Weber, G. Zimmel, P. Sorokin and others, who laid the foundation for the study of professional (including scientific) communities. Interdisciplinary interaction of scientific directions focused on the daily routine world, on identification of methods used by a person in society to perform routine actions, which eventually determined the research vector of ethnomethodology. The author describes the undertaken studies of the daily life of the scientific community in the conditions of the laboratory, the fixation of many actions taken by scientists that require additional microanalysis and explanations, anthropologization of the study of the scientific community, gender approach in ethnography of professions. The author considers the main task of the ethnographer of science in the study of daily practical routine activities of the scientist, in the design of «laboratory world» - social institutionalization of the scientific community. The gender aspect is important in the ethnography of science, focusing on the scientist as an active social subject, on gender inequality in scientific (academic, university) communities.","PeriodicalId":117377,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religion Series","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of scientific community by methods of ethnology: gender approach relevance\",\"authors\":\"N. Pushkareva\",\"doi\":\"10.32523/2616-7255-2020-133-4-100-116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article describes the methodology and methods of ethnographic knowledge in the focus of their application in sociology and sociopsychology. The author turns to classical studies of M. Weber, G. Zimmel, P. Sorokin and others, who laid the foundation for the study of professional (including scientific) communities. Interdisciplinary interaction of scientific directions focused on the daily routine world, on identification of methods used by a person in society to perform routine actions, which eventually determined the research vector of ethnomethodology. The author describes the undertaken studies of the daily life of the scientific community in the conditions of the laboratory, the fixation of many actions taken by scientists that require additional microanalysis and explanations, anthropologization of the study of the scientific community, gender approach in ethnography of professions. The author considers the main task of the ethnographer of science in the study of daily practical routine activities of the scientist, in the design of «laboratory world» - social institutionalization of the scientific community. The gender aspect is important in the ethnography of science, focusing on the scientist as an active social subject, on gender inequality in scientific (academic, university) communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religion Series\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religion Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7255-2020-133-4-100-116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religion Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7255-2020-133-4-100-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了民族志知识的方法论和方法,重点介绍了它们在社会学和社会心理学中的应用。作者转向韦伯(M. Weber)、齐梅尔(G. Zimmel)、索罗金(P. Sorokin)等人的经典研究,他们为专业(包括科学)群体的研究奠定了基础。科学方向的跨学科互动关注日常世界,关注社会中个人执行日常行为所使用的方法的识别,最终确定了民族方法学的研究向量。作者描述了在实验室条件下对科学界日常生活进行的研究,科学家采取的许多需要额外微观分析和解释的行动的固定,科学界研究的人类学,职业人种志中的性别方法。作者认为,科学民族志学者的主要任务是研究科学家的日常实践活动,设计“实验室世界”——科学共同体的社会制度化。性别方面在科学人种志中很重要,关注科学家作为一个活跃的社会主体,关注科学(学术,大学)社区中的性别不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of scientific community by methods of ethnology: gender approach relevance
The article describes the methodology and methods of ethnographic knowledge in the focus of their application in sociology and sociopsychology. The author turns to classical studies of M. Weber, G. Zimmel, P. Sorokin and others, who laid the foundation for the study of professional (including scientific) communities. Interdisciplinary interaction of scientific directions focused on the daily routine world, on identification of methods used by a person in society to perform routine actions, which eventually determined the research vector of ethnomethodology. The author describes the undertaken studies of the daily life of the scientific community in the conditions of the laboratory, the fixation of many actions taken by scientists that require additional microanalysis and explanations, anthropologization of the study of the scientific community, gender approach in ethnography of professions. The author considers the main task of the ethnographer of science in the study of daily practical routine activities of the scientist, in the design of «laboratory world» - social institutionalization of the scientific community. The gender aspect is important in the ethnography of science, focusing on the scientist as an active social subject, on gender inequality in scientific (academic, university) communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信